The Montevideo Interpretation: How the inclusion of a Quantum
Gravitational Notion of Time Solves the Measurement Problem
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14519v2
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:09:09 GMT
- Title: The Montevideo Interpretation: How the inclusion of a Quantum
Gravitational Notion of Time Solves the Measurement Problem
- Authors: Rodolfo Gambini and Jorge Pullin
- Abstract summary: We review the Montevideo Interpretation of quantum mechanics, based on the use of real clocks to describe physics.
Recent results on quantum complexity provide additional support to the type of global protocols used to prove that within ordinary -- unitary -- quantum mechanics no definite event occurs.
We show that, if one takes into account fundamental inescapable uncertainties in measuring length and time intervals due to general relativity and quantum mechanics, the previously mentioned global protocols no longer allow to distinguish whether the state is in a superposition or not.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We review the Montevideo Interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is based
on the use of real clocks to describe physics, using the framework recently
introduced by Hoehn, Smith and Lock to treat the problem of time in generally
covariant systems. The use of the new formalism makes the whole construction
more accessible to readers without familiarity with totally constrained
systems. We find that as in the original formulation, a fundamental mechanism
of decoherence emerges that allows to supplement ordinary environmental
decoherence and avoid its criticisms. Recent results on quantum complexity
provide additional support to the type of global protocols used to prove that
within ordinary -- unitary -- quantum mechanics no definite event -- an outcome
to which a probability can be associated -- occurs. In lieu of this, states
that start in a coherent superposition of possible outcomes always remain as a
superposition. We show that, if one takes into account fundamental inescapable
uncertainties in measuring length and time intervals due to general relativity
and quantum mechanics, the previously mentioned global protocols no longer
allow to distinguish whether the state is in a superposition or not. One is
left with a formulation of quantum mechanics purely defined in quantum
mechanical terms without any reference to the classical world and with an
intrinsic operational definition of quantum events that does not need external
observers.
Related papers
- A computational test of quantum contextuality, and even simpler proofs of quantumness [43.25018099464869]
We show that an arbitrary contextuality game can be compiled into an operational "test of contextuality" involving a single quantum device.
Our work can be seen as using cryptography to enforce spatial separation within subsystems of a single quantum device.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T19:30:23Z) - Quantum Time: a novel resource for quantum information [0.0]
Time in relativity theory has a status different from that adopted by standard quantum mechanics.
Time is considered as a parameter measured with reference to an external absolute Newtonian frame.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T13:13:59Z) - Indefinite order in the interface of quantum mechanics and gravity [0.0]
We discuss the notion of indefinite order, which first appears in an abstract generalization of Quantum Theory.
We present how scenarios involving gravity in low energies could lead to indefinite order.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T01:16:27Z) - Step-by-step derivation of the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics
(or from nondisturbing to quantum correlations by connecting incompatible
observables) [0.0]
This paper provides a step-by-step derivation of the quantum formalism.
It helps us to understand why this formalism is as it is.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T19:27:24Z) - Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same.
Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles.
We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Emergence of Constructor-based Irreversibility in Quantum Systems:
Theory and Experiment [0.0]
We show that irreversibility in a universe with time-reversal-symmetric laws is compatible with quantum theory's time reversal symmetric laws.
We exploit a specific model, based on the universal quantum homogeniser, realised experimentally with high-quality single-photon qubits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-30T12:57:39Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z) - Entropic Uncertainty Relations and the Quantum-to-Classical transition [77.34726150561087]
We aim to shed some light on the quantum-to-classical transition as seen through the analysis of uncertainty relations.
We employ entropic uncertainty relations to show that it is only by the inclusion of imprecision in our model of macroscopic measurements that we can prepare a system with two simultaneously well-defined quantities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-04T14:01:17Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.