Colorado in Context: Congressional Redistricting and Competing Fairness Criteria in Colorado

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06049v2
• Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:13:57 GMT
• Title: Colorado in Context: Congressional Redistricting and Competing Fairness Criteria in Colorado
• Authors: Jeanne Clelland, Haley Colgate, Daryl DeFord, Beth Malmskog, Flavia Sancier-Barbosa
• Abstract summary: We generate a large random sample of reasonable redistricting plans and determine the partisan balance of each district using returns from state-wide elections in 2018. We investigate the relationships between partisan outcomes, number of counties which are split, and number of competitive districts in a plan.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we apply techniques of ensemble analysis to understand the political baseline for Congressional representation in Colorado. We generate a large random sample of reasonable redistricting plans and determine the partisan balance of each district using returns from state-wide elections in 2018, and analyze the 2011/2012 enacted districts in this context. Colorado recently adopted a new framework for redistricting, creating an independent commission to draw district boundaries, prohibiting partisan bias and incumbency considerations, requiring that political boundaries (such as counties) be preserved as much as possible, and also requiring that mapmakers maximize the number of competitive districts. We investigate the relationships between partisan outcomes, number of counties which are split, and number of competitive districts in a plan. This paper also features two novel improvements in methodology--a more rigorous statistical framework for understanding necessary sample size, and a weighted-graph method for generating random plans which split approximately as few counties as acceptable human-drawn maps.

Related papers

• Statistical Analysis of Policy Space Compression Problem [54.1754937830779]
  Policy search methods are crucial in reinforcement learning, offering a framework to address continuous state-action and partially observable problems. Reducing the policy space through policy compression emerges as a powerful, reward-free approach to accelerate the learning process. This technique condenses the policy space into a smaller, representative set while maintaining most of the original effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T02:46:55Z)
• Information Capacity Regret Bounds for Bandits with Mediator Feedback [55.269551124587224]
  We introduce the policy set capacity as an information-theoretic measure for the complexity of the policy set. Adopting the classical EXP4 algorithm, we provide new regret bounds depending on the policy set capacity. For a selection of policy set families, we prove nearly-matching lower bounds, scaling similarly with the capacity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T19:18:47Z)
• Multiscale Parallel Tempering for Fast Sampling on Redistricting Plans [1.1233768932957773]
  A persuasive method is to compare the plan with an ensemble of neutrally drawn redistricting plans. To audit the partisan difference between the ensemble and a given plan, one must ensure that the non-partisan criteria are matched. In this work, we generate a multiscale parallel tempering approach that makes local moves at each scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T21:33:05Z)
• Deconstructing Self-Supervised Monocular Reconstruction: The Design Decisions that Matter [63.5550818034739]
  This paper presents a framework to evaluate state-of-the-art contributions to self-supervised monocular depth estimation. It includes pretraining, backbone, architectural design choices and loss functions. We re-implement, validate and re-evaluate 16 state-of-the-art contributions and introduce a new dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-02T14:38:53Z)
• Mathematically Quantifying Non-responsiveness of the 2021 Georgia Congressional Districting Plan [3.097163558730473]
  We use a Metropolized-sampling technique through a parallel tempering method combined with ReCom. We develop these improvements through the first case study of district plans in Georgia. Our analysis projects that any election in Georgia will reliably elect 9 Republicans and 5 Democrats under the enacted plan.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-13T02:58:32Z)
• Measuring Geometric Similarity Across Possible Plans for Automated Redistricting [0.0]
  This paper briefly introduces an interpretive measure of similarity, and a corresponding assignment matrix, that corresponds to the percentage of a state's area or population that stays in the same congressional district between two plans. We then show how to calculate this measure in an intuitive time and briefly demonstrate some potential use-cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T03:37:25Z)
• Compact Redistricting Plans Have Many Spanning Trees [39.779544988993294]
  In the design and analysis of political redistricting maps, it is often useful to be able to sample from the space of all partitions of the graph of census blocks into connected subgraphs of equal population. In this paper, we establish an inverse exponential relationship between the total length of the boundaries separating districts and the probability that such a map will be sampled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T23:36:01Z)
• Cascaded Residual Density Network for Crowd Counting [63.714719914701014]
  We propose a novel Cascaded Residual Density Network (CRDNet) in a coarse-to-fine approach to generate the high-quality density map for crowd counting more accurately. A novel additional local count loss is presented to refine the accuracy of crowd counting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-29T03:07:11Z)
• Bribery as a Measure of Candidate Success: Complexity Results for Approval-Based Multiwinner Rules [58.8640284079665]
  We study the problem of bribery in multiwinner elections, for the case where the voters cast approval ballots (i.e., sets of candidates they approve) We consider a number of approval-based multiwinner rules (AV, SAV, GAV, RAV, approval-based Chamberlin--Courant, and PAV) In general, our problems tend to be easier when we limit out bribery actions on increasing the number of approvals of the candidate that we want to be in a winning committee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T08:26:40Z)
• The Essential Role of Empirical Validation in Legislative Redistricting Simulation [0.0]
  We apply a recently developed computational method that can efficiently enumerate all possible redistricting plans. We show that this algorithm scales to a state with a couple of hundred geographical units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T20:51:43Z)
• A Computational Approach to Measuring Vote Elasticity and Competitiveness [24.88022242349515]
  competitiveness metrics evaluate a districting plan based on the extent to which district-level outcomes are in play or are likely to be closely contested. This paper examines several classes of competitiveness metrics motivated by recent reform proposals and then evaluate their potential outcomes across large ensembles of districting plans at the Congressional and state Senate levels. We highlight situation-specific difficulties in creating good competitiveness metrics and show that optimizing competitiveness can produce unintended consequences on other partisan metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T14:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.