Evolution of Digital Advertising Strategies during the 2020 US Presidential Primary

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.05859v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:17:20 GMT
• Title: Evolution of Digital Advertising Strategies during the 2020 US Presidential Primary
• Authors: NaLette Brodnax and Piotr Sapiezynski
• Abstract summary: We analyze the advertising strategies of US presidential election campaigns during the 2020 primary cycle. We show that campaigns heavily target voters in candidates' home states during the "invisible primary" stage before shifting to states with early primaries.
• Score: 0.5076419064097734
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Political advertising on digital platforms has grown dramatically in recent years as campaigns embrace new ways of targeting supporters and potential voters. Previous scholarship shows that digital advertising has both positive effects on democratic politics through increased voter knowledge and participation, and negative effects through user manipulation, opinion echo-chambers, and diminished privacy. However, research on election campaign strategies has focused primarily on traditional media, such as television. Here, we examine how political campaign dynamics have evolved in response to the growth of digital media by analyzing the advertising strategies of US presidential election campaigns during the 2020 primary cycle. To identify geographic and temporal trends, we employ regression analyses of campaign spending across nearly 600,000 advertisements published on Facebook. We show that campaigns heavily target voters in candidates' home states during the "invisible primary" stage before shifting to states with early primaries.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• On Detecting Policy-Related Political Ads: An Exploratory Analysis of Meta Ads in 2022 French Election [8.191542320784347]
  The budget spent solely on political advertising in the U.S. has increased by more than 100% from $700 million during the 2017-2018 U.S. election cycle to $1.6 billion during the 2020 U.S. presidential elections. The capacity offered by online platforms to micro-target ads with political content has been worrying lawmakers, journalists, and online platforms. Online platforms and regulators have agreed that researchers, journalists, and civil society need to be able to scrutinize the political ads running on large online platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T09:04:43Z)
• The Chance of Winning Election Impacts on Social Media Strategy [7.528982057686348]
  We analyze candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. As their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T03:10:02Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Political advertisement on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022 Italian general election [0.9496529663479973]
  We study the extent to which political ads were delivered on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022 Italian general election. We analyze over 23 k unique ads paid by 2.7 k unique sponsors, with an associated amount spent of 4 M EUR and over 1 billion views generated. We find results that are in accordance with their political agenda and the electoral outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T13:37:18Z)
• Weakly Supervised Learning for Analyzing Political Campaigns on Facebook [24.29993132301275]
  We propose a weakly supervised approach to identify the stance and issue of political ads on Facebook. We analyze the temporal dynamics of the political ads on election polls.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T15:35:37Z)
• Persuasion Strategies in Advertisements [68.70313043201882]
  We introduce an extensive vocabulary of persuasion strategies and build the first ad image corpus annotated with persuasion strategies. We then formulate the task of persuasion strategy prediction with multi-modal learning. We conduct a real-world case study on 1600 advertising campaigns of 30 Fortune-500 companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-20T07:33:13Z)
• How Algorithms Shape the Distribution of Political Advertising: Case Studies of Facebook, Google, and TikTok [5.851101657703105]
  We analyze a dataset containing over 800,000 ads and 2.5 million videos about the 2020 U.S. presidential election from Facebook, Google, and TikTok. We conduct the first large scale data analysis of public data to critically evaluate how these platforms amplified or moderated the distribution of political advertisements. We conclude with recommendations for how to improve the disclosures so that the public can hold the platforms and political advertisers accountable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T18:19:30Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.