Deploying Crowdsourcing for Workflow Driven Business Process
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01168v1
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:57:21 GMT
- Title: Deploying Crowdsourcing for Workflow Driven Business Process
- Authors: Rafa{\l} Mas{\l}yk, Kinga Skorupska, Piotr Gago, Marcin Niewi\'nski,
Barbara Karpowicz, Anna Jaskulska, Katarzyna Abramczuk, Wies{\l}aw Kope\'c
- Abstract summary: The main goal of this paper is to discuss how to integrate the possibilities of crowdsourcing platforms with systems supporting workflow.
This work is an attempt to expand the functional capabilities of typical business systems by allowing selected process tasks to be performed by unlimited human resources.
- Score: 5.531452309322118
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The main goal of this paper is to discuss how to integrate the possibilities
of crowdsourcing platforms with systems supporting workflow to enable the
engagement and interaction with business tasks of a wider group of people.
Thus, this work is an attempt to expand the functional capabilities of typical
business systems by allowing selected process tasks to be performed by
unlimited human resources. Opening business tasks to crowdsourcing, within
established Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) will improve the
flexibility of company processes and allow for lower work-load and greater
specialization among the staff employed on-site. The presented conceptual work
is based on the current international standards in this field, promoted by
Workflows Management Coalition. To this end, the functioning of business
platforms was analysed and their functionality was presented visually, followed
by a proposal and a discussion of how to implement crowdsourcing into workflow
systems.
Related papers
- Integrating an ISO30401-compliant Knowledge management system with existing business processes of an organization [0.0]
ISO30401 is a Management System Standard, introduced in 2018, establishing universal requirements for the set up of a Knowledge Management System in an organization.<n>This article recaps process principles in the context of ISO and explores, based on our experience, how an ISO30401-compliant Knowledge Management System (KMS) entwines with all other processes of an Integrated Management System.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T08:54:19Z) - Cross-Task Experiential Learning on LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration [63.90193684394165]
We introduce multi-agent cross-task experiential learning (MAEL), a novel framework that endows LLM-driven agents with explicit cross-task learning and experience accumulation.<n>During the experiential learning phase, we quantify the quality for each step in the task-solving workflow and store the resulting rewards.<n>During inference, agents retrieve high-reward, task-relevant experiences as few-shot examples to enhance the effectiveness of each reasoning step.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T07:24:37Z) - An LLM-enabled Multi-Agent Autonomous Mechatronics Design Framework [49.633199780510864]
This work proposes a multi-agent autonomous mechatronics design framework, integrating expertise across mechanical design, optimization, electronics, and software engineering.
operating primarily through a language-driven workflow, the framework incorporates structured human feedback to ensure robust performance under real-world constraints.
A fully functional autonomous vessel was developed with optimized propulsion, cost-effective electronics, and advanced control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-20T16:57:45Z) - Flow: Modularized Agentic Workflow Automation [53.073598156915615]
Multi-agent frameworks powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great success in automated planning and task execution.
However, the effective adjustment of agentic during execution has not been well studied.
In this paper, we define an activity-on-vertex (AOV) graph, which allows continuous workflow refinement by agents.
Our proposed multi-agent framework achieves efficient concurrent execution of subtasks, effective goal achievement, and enhanced error tolerance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-14T04:35:37Z) - Enhancing Workplace Productivity and Well-being Using AI Agent [0.0]
This paper discusses the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance workplace productivity and employee well-being.
By integrating machine learning (ML) techniques with neurobiological data, the proposed approaches ensure alignment with human ethical standards.
The system utilizes biometric feedback from employees to generate personalized health prompts, fostering a supportive work environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-04T20:11:00Z) - Towards Modeling Human-Agentic Collaborative Workflows: A BPMN Extension [2.031841135743809]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have facilitated the definition of autonomous intelligent agents.
The orchestration and coordination of these agents is still challenging.
Current business process modeling languages fall short when it comes to specifying these new mixed collaborative scenarios.
We extend a well-known process modeling language (i.e., BPMN) to enable the definition of this new type of workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-08T14:34:30Z) - Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
We introduce WorFBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures.
We also present WorFEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms.
We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z) - Applying the FAIR Principles to Computational Workflows [0.0]
computational tools are increasingly recognized as tools for productivity, trends, and democratized access to platforms and processing know-how.
As digital objects to be shared, discovered, and reused, computational benefit from the FAIR principles, which stand for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable.
We present our recommendations with commentary that reflects our discussions and justifies our choices and adaptations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T15:00:17Z) - Agent Workflow Memory [71.81385627556398]
We introduce Agent Memory, a method for inducing commonly reused routines.
AWM substantially improves the baseline results by 24.6% and 51.1% relative success rate.
Online AWM robustly generalizes in cross-task, website, and domain evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-11T17:21:00Z) - OfficeBench: Benchmarking Language Agents across Multiple Applications for Office Automation [51.27062359412488]
Office automation significantly enhances human productivity by automatically finishing routine tasks in the workflow.
We introduce OfficeBench, one of the first office automation benchmarks for evaluating current LLM agents' capability to address office tasks in realistic office.
Applying our customized evaluation methods on each task, we find that GPT-4 Omni achieves the highest pass rate of 47.00%, demonstrating a decent performance in handling office tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-26T19:27:17Z) - BMW Agents -- A Framework For Task Automation Through Multi-Agent Collaboration [0.0]
We focus on designing a flexible agent engineering framework capable of handling complex use case applications across various domains.
The proposed framework provides reliability in industrial applications and presents techniques to ensure a scalable, flexible, and collaborative workflow for multiple autonomous agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T16:39:20Z) - WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? [83.19032025950986]
We study the use of large language model-based agents for interacting with software via web browsers.
WorkArena is a benchmark of 33 tasks based on the widely-used ServiceNow platform.
BrowserGym is an environment for the design and evaluation of such agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T14:58:45Z) - The Foundations of Computational Management: A Systematic Approach to
Task Automation for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Existing
Workflows [55.2480439325792]
This article introduces Computational Management, a systematic approach to task automation.
The article offers three easy step-by-step procedures to begin the process of implementing AI within a workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T01:45:14Z) - Power-up! What Can Generative Models Do for Human Computation Workflows? [13.484359389266864]
Investigation into large language models (LLMs) as part of crowdsourcing remains an under-explored space.
From an empirical standpoint, little is currently understood about how LLMs can improve the effectiveness of crowdsourcing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T12:35:29Z) - Concepts and Algorithms for Agent-based Decentralized and Integrated
Scheduling of Production and Auxiliary Processes [78.120734120667]
This paper describes an agent-based decentralized and integrated scheduling approach.
Part of the requirements is to develop a linearly scaling communication architecture.
The approach is explained using an example based on industrial requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-06T18:44:29Z) - Automatic Resource Allocation in Business Processes: A Systematic Literature Survey [0.0699049312989311]
Resource allocation is a complex decision-making problem with high impact on the effectiveness and efficiency of processes.
A wide range of approaches was developed to support research allocation automatically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-15T11:40:20Z) - Towards an Integrated Conceptual Modelling Kernel for Business
Transaction Workflows [0.0]
The workflow concept, proliferated through the recently emergent computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) systems and workflow systems.
In this paper, a number of essential modelling concepts and features for business transaction are developed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-27T08:09:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.