A Hybrid 2-stage Neural Optimization for Pareto Front Extraction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11684v2
• Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:03:10 GMT
• Title: A Hybrid 2-stage Neural Optimization for Pareto Front Extraction
• Authors: Gurpreet Singh, Soumyajit Gupta, Matthew Lease, Clint Dawson
• Abstract summary: A major obstacle to optimal trade-off solutions is that they don't always converge to each other. We propose a two-stage approach that is accurate and cost-effective.
• Score: 3.918940900258555
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Classification, recommendation, and ranking problems often involve competing goals with additional constraints (e.g., to satisfy fairness or diversity criteria). Such optimization problems are quite challenging, often involving non-convex functions along with considerations of user preferences in balancing trade-offs. Pareto solutions represent optimal frontiers for jointly optimizing multiple competing objectives. A major obstacle for frequently used linear-scalarization strategies is that the resulting optimization problem might not always converge to a global optimum. Furthermore, such methods only return one solution point per run. A Pareto solution set is a subset of all such global optima over multiple runs for different trade-off choices. Therefore, a Pareto front can only be guaranteed with multiple runs of the linear-scalarization problem, where all runs converge to their respective global optima. Consequently, extracting a Pareto front for practical problems is computationally intractable with substantial computational overheads, limited scalability, and reduced accuracy. We propose a robust, low cost, two-stage, hybrid neural Pareto optimization approach that is accurate and scales (compute space and time) with data dimensions, as well as number of functions and constraints. The first stage (neural network) efficiently extracts a weak Pareto front, using Fritz-John conditions as the discriminator, with no assumptions of convexity on the objectives or constraints. The second stage (efficient Pareto filter) extracts the strong Pareto optimal subset given the weak front from stage 1. Fritz-John conditions provide us with theoretical bounds on approximation error between the true and network extracted weak Pareto front. Numerical experiments demonstrates the accuracy and efficiency on a canonical set of benchmark problems and a fairness optimization task from prior works.

Related papers

• Preference-Optimized Pareto Set Learning for Blackbox Optimization [1.9628841617148691]
  No single solution exists that can optimize all the objectives simultaneously. In a typical MOO problem, the goal is to find a set of optimum solutions (Pareto set) that trades off the preferences among objectives. Our formulation leads to a bilevel optimization problem that can be solved by e.g. differentiable cross-entropy methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T13:23:07Z)
• Towards Efficient Pareto-optimal Utility-Fairness between Groups in Repeated Rankings [7.6275971668447005]
  We tackle the problem of computing a sequence of rankings with the guarantee of the Pareto-optimal balance between consumers and producers of items. We introduce a novel approach to the above problem by using the Expohedron - a permutahedron whose points represent all exposures of items. We further propose an efficient method by relaxing our optimization problem on the Expohedron's circumscribed $n$-sphere, which significantly improve the running time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T05:48:54Z)
• Optimization on Pareto sets: On a theory of multi-objective optimization [7.907376287850398]
  In multi-objective optimization, a single decision vector must balance the trade-offs between many objectives. We consider a more practically significant optimization problem, where the goal is to optimize a constrained set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T05:55:52Z)
• Symmetric Tensor Networks for Generative Modeling and Constrained Combinatorial Optimization [72.41480594026815]
  Constrained optimization problems abound in industry, from portfolio optimization to logistics. One of the major roadblocks in solving these problems is the presence of non-trivial hard constraints which limit the valid search space. In this work, we encode arbitrary integer-valued equality constraints of the form Ax=b, directly into U(1) symmetric networks (TNs) and leverage their applicability as quantum-inspired generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T18:59:54Z)
• Learning Proximal Operators to Discover Multiple Optima [66.98045013486794]
  We present an end-to-end method to learn the proximal operator across non-family problems. We show that for weakly-ized objectives and under mild conditions, the method converges globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T05:53:28Z)
• Faster Algorithm and Sharper Analysis for Constrained Markov Decision Process [56.55075925645864]
  The problem of constrained decision process (CMDP) is investigated, where an agent aims to maximize the expected accumulated discounted reward subject to multiple constraints. A new utilities-dual convex approach is proposed with novel integration of three ingredients: regularized policy, dual regularizer, and Nesterov's gradient descent dual. This is the first demonstration that nonconcave CMDP problems can attain the lower bound of $mathcal O (1/epsilon)$ for all complexity optimization subject to convex constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-20T02:57:21Z)
• Pareto Navigation Gradient Descent: a First-Order Algorithm for Optimization in Pareto Set [17.617944390196286]
  Modern machine learning applications, such as multi-task learning, require finding optimal model parameters to trade-off multiple objective functions. We propose a first-order algorithm that approximately solves OPT-in-Pareto using only gradient information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-17T04:07:04Z)
• Recent Theoretical Advances in Non-Convex Optimization [56.88981258425256]
  Motivated by recent increased interest in analysis of optimization algorithms for non- optimization in deep networks and other problems in data, we give an overview of recent results of theoretical optimization algorithms for non- optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-11T08:28:51Z)
• Divide and Learn: A Divide and Conquer Approach for Predict+Optimize [50.03608569227359]
  The predict+optimize problem combines machine learning ofproblem coefficients with a optimization prob-lem that uses the predicted coefficients. We show how to directlyexpress the loss of the optimization problem in terms of thepredicted coefficients as a piece-wise linear function. We propose a novel divide and algorithm to tackle optimization problems without this restriction and predict itscoefficients using the optimization loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-04T00:26:56Z)
• Extracting Optimal Solution Manifolds using Constrained Neural Optimization [6.800113407368289]
  Constrained Optimization solution algorithms are restricted to point based solutions. We present an approach for extracting optimal sets as approximate, where unmodified non-informed constraints are defined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-13T15:37:44Z)
• Convergence of adaptive algorithms for weakly convex constrained optimization [59.36386973876765]
  We prove the $mathcaltilde O(t-1/4)$ rate of convergence for the norm of the gradient of Moreau envelope. Our analysis works with mini-batch size of $1$, constant first and second order moment parameters, and possibly smooth optimization domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:43:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.