Comparing hundreds of machine learning classifiers and discrete choice models in predicting travel behavior: an empirical benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01130v2
• Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 17:04:07 GMT
• Title: Comparing hundreds of machine learning classifiers and discrete choice models in predicting travel behavior: an empirical benchmark
• Authors: Shenhao Wang, Baichuan Mo, Yunhan Zheng, Stephane Hess, Jinhua Zhao,
• Abstract summary: Many studies have compared machine learning (ML) and discrete choice models (DCMs) in predicting travel demand.<n>These studies often lack generalizability as they compare models deterministically without considering contextual variations.<n>This benchmark study compares two large-scale data sources.
• Score: 6.815730801645785
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Numerous studies have compared machine learning (ML) and discrete choice models (DCMs) in predicting travel demand. However, these studies often lack generalizability as they compare models deterministically without considering contextual variations. To address this limitation, our study develops an empirical benchmark by designing a tournament model, thus efficiently summarizing a large number of experiments, quantifying the randomness in model comparisons, and using formal statistical tests to differentiate between the model and contextual effects. This benchmark study compares two large-scale data sources: a database compiled from literature review summarizing 136 experiments from 35 studies, and our own experiment data, encompassing a total of 6,970 experiments from 105 models and 12 model families. This benchmark study yields two key findings. Firstly, many ML models, particularly the ensemble methods and deep learning, statistically outperform the DCM family (i.e., multinomial, nested, and mixed logit models). However, this study also highlights the crucial role of the contextual factors (i.e., data sources, inputs and choice categories), which can explain models' predictive performance more effectively than the differences in model types alone. Model performance varies significantly with data sources, improving with larger sample sizes and lower dimensional alternative sets. After controlling all the model and contextual factors, significant randomness still remains, implying inherent uncertainty in such model comparisons. Overall, we suggest that future researchers shift more focus from context-specific model comparisons towards examining model transferability across contexts and characterizing the inherent uncertainty in ML, thus creating more robust and generalizable next-generation travel demand models.

Related papers

• Model Provenance Testing for Large Language Models [14.949325775620439]
  We develop a framework for testing model provenance: Whether one model is derived from another. Our approach is based on the key observation that real-world model derivations preserve significant similarities in model outputs. Using only black-box access to models, we employ multiple hypothesis testing to compare model similarities against a baseline established by unrelated models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T07:39:37Z)
• Computation-Aware Gaussian Processes: Model Selection And Linear-Time Inference [55.150117654242706]
  We show that model selection for computation-aware GPs trained on 1.8 million data points can be done within a few hours on a single GPU. As a result of this work, Gaussian processes can be trained on large-scale datasets without significantly compromising their ability to quantify uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T21:11:48Z)
• Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settings [53.17563688225137]
  Simulation-based inference ( SBI) is capable of approximating the posterior distribution that relates input parameters to a given observation. In this work, we consider a tall data extension in which multiple observations are available to better infer the parameters of the model. We compare our method to recently proposed competing approaches on various numerical experiments and demonstrate its superiority in terms of numerical stability and computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T09:23:36Z)
• A Lightweight Measure of Classification Difficulty from Application Dataset Characteristics [4.220363193932374]
  We propose an efficient cosine similarity-based classification difficulty measure S. It is calculated from the number of classes and intra- and inter-class similarity metrics of the dataset. We show how a practitioner can use this measure to help select an efficient model 6 to 29x faster than through repeated training and testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T03:27:09Z)
• No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance [68.18779562801762]
  multimodal models require exponentially more data to achieve linear improvements in downstream "zero-shot" performance. Our study reveals an exponential need for training data which implies that the key to "zero-shot" generalization capabilities under large-scale training paradigms remains to be found.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T17:58:02Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• Comparing Foundation Models using Data Kernels [13.099029073152257]
  We present a methodology for directly comparing the embedding space geometry of foundation models. Our methodology is grounded in random graph theory and enables valid hypothesis testing of embedding similarity. We show how our framework can induce a manifold of models equipped with a distance function that correlates strongly with several downstream metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T02:01:07Z)
• Activity Cliff Prediction: Dataset and Benchmark [20.41770222873952]
  We first introduce ACNet, a large-scale dataset for AC prediction. ACNet curates over 400K Matched Molecular Pairs (MMPs) against 190 targets. We propose a baseline framework to benchmark the predictive performance of molecular representations encoded by deep neural networks for AC prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T09:19:07Z)
• A prediction and behavioural analysis of machine learning methods for modelling travel mode choice [0.26249027950824505]
  We conduct a systematic comparison of different modelling approaches, across multiple modelling problems, in terms of the key factors likely to affect model choice. Results indicate that the models with the highest disaggregate predictive performance provide poorer estimates of behavioural indicators and aggregate mode shares. It is also observed that the MNL model performs robustly in a variety of situations, though ML techniques can improve the estimates of behavioural indices such as Willingness to Pay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-11T11:10:32Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Approximate Gibbs Sampler for Efficient Inference of Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Grouped Count Data [0.0]
  This research develops an approximate Gibbs sampler (AGS) to efficiently learn the HBPRMs while maintaining the inference accuracy. Numerical experiments using real and synthetic datasets with small and large counts demonstrate the superior performance of AGS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T21:00:55Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Model Selection for Heterogeneous Causal Effect Estimation [24.65301562548798]
  We study the problem of model selection in causal inference, specifically for conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation. We conduct an empirical analysis to benchmark the surrogate model selection metrics introduced in the literature, as well as the novel ones introduced in this work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T16:26:06Z)
• Investigating Ensemble Methods for Model Robustness Improvement of Text Classifiers [66.36045164286854]
  We analyze a set of existing bias features and demonstrate there is no single model that works best for all the cases. By choosing an appropriate bias model, we can obtain a better robustness result than baselines with a more sophisticated model design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-28T17:52:10Z)
• On the Generalization and Adaption Performance of Causal Models [99.64022680811281]
  Differentiable causal discovery has proposed to factorize the data generating process into a set of modules. We study the generalization and adaption performance of such modular neural causal models. Our analysis shows that the modular neural causal models outperform other models on both zero and few-shot adaptation in low data regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-09T17:12:32Z)
• Performance and Interpretability Comparisons of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: An Empirical Study [3.7881729884531805]
  The paper is organized in a findings-based manner, with each section providing general conclusions. Overall, XGB and FFNNs were competitive, with FFNNs showing better performance in smooth models. RF did not perform well in general, confirming the findings in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T12:04:33Z)
• Deep Learning Models for Knowledge Tracing: Review and Empirical Evaluation [2.423547527175807]
  We review and evaluate a body of deep learning knowledge tracing (DLKT) models with openly available and widely-used data sets. The evaluated DLKT models have been reimplemented for assessing and replicability of previously reported results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T14:19:27Z)
• Sparse MoEs meet Efficient Ensembles [49.313497379189315]
  We study the interplay of two popular classes of such models: ensembles of neural networks and sparse mixture of experts (sparse MoEs) We present Efficient Ensemble of Experts (E$3$), a scalable and simple ensemble of sparse MoEs that takes the best of both classes of models, while using up to 45% fewer FLOPs than a deep ensemble.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T11:58:35Z)
• A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
  We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT. The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous. We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)
• Generalized Matrix Factorization: efficient algorithms for fitting generalized linear latent variable models to large data arrays [62.997667081978825]
  Generalized Linear Latent Variable models (GLLVMs) generalize such factor models to non-Gaussian responses. Current algorithms for estimating model parameters in GLLVMs require intensive computation and do not scale to large datasets. We propose a new approach for fitting GLLVMs to high-dimensional datasets, based on approximating the model using penalized quasi-likelihood.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T04:28:19Z)
• Fast, Accurate, and Simple Models for Tabular Data via Augmented Distillation [97.42894942391575]
  We propose FAST-DAD to distill arbitrarily complex ensemble predictors into individual models like boosted trees, random forests, and deep networks. Our individual distilled models are over 10x faster and more accurate than ensemble predictors produced by AutoML tools like H2O/AutoSklearn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T09:57:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.