Probabilistic Trust Intervals for Out of Distribution Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.01336v3
• Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:10:48 GMT
• Title: Probabilistic Trust Intervals for Out of Distribution Detection
• Authors: Gagandeep Singh, Ishan Mishra, Deepak Mishra,
• Abstract summary: We propose a straightforward yet novel technique to enhance OOD detection in pre-trained networks without altering its original parameters. Our approach defines probabilistic trust intervals for each network weight, determined using in-distribution data. We evaluate our approach on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10-C.
• Score: 8.35564578781252
• License:
• Abstract: The ability of a deep learning network to distinguish between in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs is crucial for ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems. Existing OOD detection methods often involve complex architectural innovations, such as ensemble models, which, while enhancing detection accuracy, significantly increase model complexity and training time. Other methods utilize surrogate samples to simulate OOD inputs, but these may not generalize well across different types of OOD data. In this paper, we propose a straightforward yet novel technique to enhance OOD detection in pre-trained networks without altering its original parameters. Our approach defines probabilistic trust intervals for each network weight, determined using in-distribution data. During inference, additional weight values are sampled, and the resulting disagreements among outputs are utilized for OOD detection. We propose a metric to quantify this disagreement and validate its effectiveness with empirical evidence. Our method significantly outperforms various baseline methods across multiple OOD datasets without requiring actual or surrogate OOD samples. We evaluate our approach on MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10-C (a corruption-augmented version of CIFAR-10), across various neural network architectures (e.g., VGG-16, ResNet-20, DenseNet-100). On the MNIST-FashionMNIST setup, our method achieves a False Positive Rate (FPR) of 12.46\% at 95\% True Positive Rate (TPR), compared to 27.09\% achieved by the best baseline. On adversarial and corrupted datasets such as CIFAR-10-C, our proposed method easily differentiate between clean and noisy inputs. These results demonstrate the robustness of our approach in identifying corrupted and adversarial inputs, all without requiring OOD samples during training.

Related papers

• What If the Input is Expanded in OOD Detection? [77.37433624869857]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection aims to identify OOD inputs from unknown classes. Various scoring functions are proposed to distinguish it from in-distribution (ID) data. We introduce a novel perspective, i.e., employing different common corruptions on the input space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T06:47:28Z)
• FlowCon: Out-of-Distribution Detection using Flow-Based Contrastive Learning [0.0]
  We introduce textitFlowCon, a new density-based OOD detection technique. Our main innovation lies in efficiently combining the properties of normalizing flow with supervised contrastive learning. Empirical evaluation shows the enhanced performance of our method across common vision datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T20:33:56Z)
• Model-free Test Time Adaptation for Out-Of-Distribution Detection [62.49795078366206]
  We propose a Non-Parametric Test Time textbfAdaptation framework for textbfDistribution textbfDetection (abbr) abbr utilizes online test samples for model adaptation during testing, enhancing adaptability to changing data distributions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of abbr through comprehensive experiments on multiple OOD detection benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T02:00:47Z)
• Distilling the Unknown to Unveil Certainty [66.29929319664167]
  Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential in identifying test samples that deviate from the in-distribution (ID) data upon which a standard network is trained. This paper introduces OOD knowledge distillation, a pioneering learning framework applicable whether or not training ID data is available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T08:05:02Z)
• Out-of-distribution Object Detection through Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation [10.985423935142832]
  We propose a novel, intuitive, and scalable probabilistic object detection method for OOD detection. Our method is able to distinguish between in-distribution (ID) data and OOD data via weight parameter sampling from proposed Gaussian distributions. We demonstrate that our Bayesian object detector can achieve satisfactory OOD identification performance by reducing the FPR95 score by up to 8.19% and increasing the AUROC score by up to 13.94% when trained on BDD100k and VOC datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T19:10:52Z)
• WeShort: Out-of-distribution Detection With Weak Shortcut structure [0.0]
  We propose a simple and effective post-hoc technique, WeShort, to reduce the overconfidence of neural networks on OOD data. Our method is compatible with different OOD detection scores and can generalize well to different architectures of networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T07:59:10Z)
• Igeood: An Information Geometry Approach to Out-of-Distribution Detection [35.04325145919005]
  We introduce Igeood, an effective method for detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) samples. Igeood applies to any pre-trained neural network, works under various degrees of access to the machine learning model. We show that Igeood outperforms competing state-of-the-art methods on a variety of network architectures and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T11:26:35Z)
• Provably Robust Detection of Out-of-distribution Data (almost) for free [124.14121487542613]
  Deep neural networks are known to produce highly overconfident predictions on out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this paper we propose a novel method where from first principles we combine a certifiable OOD detector with a standard classifier into an OOD aware classifier. In this way we achieve the best of two worlds: certifiably adversarially robust OOD detection, even for OOD samples close to the in-distribution, without loss in prediction accuracy and close to state-of-the-art OOD detection performance for non-manipulated OOD data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T11:40:49Z)
• Learn what you can't learn: Regularized Ensembles for Transductive Out-of-distribution Detection [76.39067237772286]
  We show that current out-of-distribution (OOD) detection algorithms for neural networks produce unsatisfactory results in a variety of OOD detection scenarios. This paper studies how such "hard" OOD scenarios can benefit from adjusting the detection method after observing a batch of the test data. We propose a novel method that uses an artificial labeling scheme for the test data and regularization to obtain ensembles of models that produce contradictory predictions only on the OOD samples in a test batch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T16:55:13Z)
• Robust Out-of-distribution Detection for Neural Networks [51.19164318924997]
  We show that existing detection mechanisms can be extremely brittle when evaluating on in-distribution and OOD inputs. We propose an effective algorithm called ALOE, which performs robust training by exposing the model to both adversarially crafted inlier and outlier examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-21T17:46:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.