Counterfactual Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit: a Real-World Application
to Diagnose Apple Diseases
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04214v1
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:11:10 GMT
- Title: Counterfactual Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit: a Real-World Application
to Diagnose Apple Diseases
- Authors: Gabriele Sottocornola, Fabio Stella, Markus Zanker
- Abstract summary: Post-harvest diseases of apple are one of the major issues in the economical sector of apple production.
We developed DSSApple, a picture-based decision support system able to help users in the diagnosis of apple diseases.
- Score: 1.7403133838762446
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Post-harvest diseases of apple are one of the major issues in the economical
sector of apple production, causing severe economical losses to producers.
Thus, we developed DSSApple, a picture-based decision support system able to
help users in the diagnosis of apple diseases. Specifically, this paper
addresses the problem of sequentially optimizing for the best diagnosis,
leveraging past interactions with the system and their contextual information
(i.e. the evidence provided by the users). The problem of learning an online
model while optimizing for its outcome is commonly addressed in the literature
through a stochastic active learning paradigm - i.e. Contextual Multi-Armed
Bandit (CMAB). This methodology interactively updates the decision model
considering the success of each past interaction with respect to the context
provided in each round. However, this information is very often partial and
inadequate to handle such complex decision making problems. On the other hand,
human decisions implicitly include unobserved factors (referred in the
literature as unobserved confounders) that significantly contribute to the
human's final decision. In this paper, we take advantage of the information
embedded in the observed human decisions to marginalize confounding factors and
improve the capability of the CMAB model to identify the correct diagnosis.
Specifically, we propose a Counterfactual Contextual Multi-Armed Bandit, a
model based on the causal concept of counterfactual. The proposed model is
validated with offline experiments based on data collected through a large user
study on the application. The results prove that our model is able to
outperform both traditional CMAB algorithms and observed user decisions, in
real-world tasks of predicting the correct apple disease.
Related papers
- Unified Uncertainty Estimation for Cognitive Diagnosis Models [70.46998436898205]
We propose a unified uncertainty estimation approach for a wide range of cognitive diagnosis models.
We decompose the uncertainty of diagnostic parameters into data aspect and model aspect.
Our method is effective and can provide useful insights into the uncertainty of cognitive diagnosis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-09T13:48:20Z) - Optimising Human-AI Collaboration by Learning Convincing Explanations [62.81395661556852]
We propose a method for a collaborative system that remains safe by having a human making decisions.
Ardent enables efficient and effective decision-making by adapting to individual preferences for explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T16:00:16Z) - Topological Interpretability for Deep-Learning [0.30806551485143496]
Deep learning (DL) models cannot quantify the certainty of their predictions.
This work presents a method to infer prominent features in two DL classification models trained on clinical and non-clinical text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-15T13:38:13Z) - A Multimodal Data-driven Framework for Anxiety Screening [15.002401707506941]
We propose a data-driven anxiety screening framework, namely MMD-AS, and conduct experiments on the collected health data of over 200 seafarers by smartphones.
The proposed framework's feature extraction, dimension reduction, feature selection, and anxiety inference are jointly trained to improve the model's performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-16T02:25:05Z) - Mitigating Health Disparities in EHR via Deconfounder [5.511343163506091]
We propose a novel framework, Parity Medical Deconfounder (PriMeD), to deal with the disparity issue in healthcare datasets.
PriMeD adopts a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) to learn latent factors (substitute confounders) for observational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-28T05:16:50Z) - Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings.
The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms.
Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z) - Scalable Online Disease Diagnosis via Multi-Model-Fused Actor-Critic
Reinforcement Learning [9.274138493400436]
For those seeking healthcare advice online, AI based dialogue agents capable of interacting with patients to perform automatic disease diagnosis are a viable option.
This can be formulated as a problem of sequential feature (symptom) selection and classification for which reinforcement learning (RL) approaches have been proposed as a natural solution.
We propose a Multi-Model-Fused Actor-Critic (MMF-AC) RL framework that consists of a generative actor network and a diagnostic critic network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T03:06:16Z) - NeuralSympCheck: A Symptom Checking and Disease Diagnostic Neural Model
with Logic Regularization [59.15047491202254]
symptom checking systems inquire users for their symptoms and perform a rapid and affordable medical assessment of their condition.
We propose a new approach based on the supervised learning of neural models with logic regularization.
Our experiments show that the proposed approach outperforms the best existing methods in the accuracy of diagnosis when the number of diagnoses and symptoms is large.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-02T07:57:17Z) - Leveraging Expert Consistency to Improve Algorithmic Decision Support [62.61153549123407]
We explore the use of historical expert decisions as a rich source of information that can be combined with observed outcomes to narrow the construct gap.
We propose an influence function-based methodology to estimate expert consistency indirectly when each case in the data is assessed by a single expert.
Our empirical evaluation, using simulations in a clinical setting and real-world data from the child welfare domain, indicates that the proposed approach successfully narrows the construct gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-24T05:40:29Z) - Indecision Modeling [50.00689136829134]
It is important that AI systems act in ways which align with human values.
People are often indecisive, and especially so when their decision has moral implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-15T18:32:37Z) - Neuromorphic AI Empowered Root Cause Analysis of Faults in Emerging
Networks [3.710841042000923]
We propose an AI-based fault diagnosis solution that offers a key step towards a completely automated self-healing system.
We compare the performance of the proposed solution against state-of-the-art solution in literature.
Results show that neuromorphic computing model achieves high classification accuracy as compared to the other models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-04T13:26:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.