Demarcating Endogenous and Exogenous Opinion Dynamics: An Experimental Design Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05954v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:38:15 GMT
• Title: Demarcating Endogenous and Exogenous Opinion Dynamics: An Experimental Design Approach
• Authors: Paramita Koley, Avirup Saha, Sourangshu Bhattacharya, Niloy Ganguly, and Abir De
• Abstract summary: In this paper, we design a suite of unsupervised classification methods based on experimental design approaches. We aim to select the subsets of events which minimize different measures of mean estimation error. Our experiments range from validating prediction performance on unsanitized and sanitized events to checking the effect of selecting optimal subsets of various sizes.
• Score: 27.975266406080152
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The networked opinion diffusion in online social networks (OSN) is often governed by the two genres of opinions - endogenous opinions that are driven by the influence of social contacts among users, and exogenous opinions which are formed by external effects like news, feeds etc. Accurate demarcation of endogenous and exogenous messages offers an important cue to opinion modeling, thereby enhancing its predictive performance. In this paper, we design a suite of unsupervised classification methods based on experimental design approaches, in which, we aim to select the subsets of events which minimize different measures of mean estimation error. In more detail, we first show that these subset selection tasks are NP-Hard. Then we show that the associated objective functions are weakly submodular, which allows us to cast efficient approximation algorithms with guarantees. Finally, we validate the efficacy of our proposal on various real-world datasets crawled from Twitter as well as diverse synthetic datasets. Our experiments range from validating prediction performance on unsanitized and sanitized events to checking the effect of selecting optimal subsets of various sizes. Through various experiments, we have found that our method offers a significant improvement in accuracy in terms of opinion forecasting, against several competitors.

Related papers

• Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference [50.95521705711802]
  Previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model. This paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference. We propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T15:20:41Z)
• Benchmarking Bayesian Causal Discovery Methods for Downstream Treatment Effect Estimation [137.3520153445413]
  A notable gap exists in the evaluation of causal discovery methods, where insufficient emphasis is placed on downstream inference. We evaluate seven established baseline causal discovery methods including a newly proposed method based on GFlowNets. The results of our study demonstrate that some of the algorithms studied are able to effectively capture a wide range of useful and diverse ATE modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T02:58:10Z)
• ASPEST: Bridging the Gap Between Active Learning and Selective Prediction [56.001808843574395]
  Selective prediction aims to learn a reliable model that abstains from making predictions when uncertain. Active learning aims to lower the overall labeling effort, and hence human dependence, by querying the most informative examples. In this work, we introduce a new learning paradigm, active selective prediction, which aims to query more informative samples from the shifted target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T23:51:07Z)
• Better Understanding Differences in Attribution Methods via Systematic Evaluations [57.35035463793008]
  Post-hoc attribution methods have been proposed to identify image regions most influential to the models' decisions. We propose three novel evaluation schemes to more reliably measure the faithfulness of those methods. We use these evaluation schemes to study strengths and shortcomings of some widely used attribution methods over a wide range of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T14:24:58Z)
• A Closer Look at the Intervention Procedure of Concept Bottleneck Models [18.222350428973343]
  Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) are a class of interpretable neural network models that predict the target response of a given input based on its high-level concepts. CBMs enable domain experts to intervene on the predicted concepts and rectify any mistakes at test time, so that more accurate task predictions can be made at the end. We develop various ways of selecting intervening concepts to improve the intervention effectiveness and conduct an array of in-depth analyses as to how they evolve under different circumstances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T02:37:24Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• A Two-Stage Feature Selection Approach for Robust Evaluation of Treatment Effects in High-Dimensional Observational Data [1.4710887888397084]
  We propose a novel two-stage feature selection technique called, Outcome Adaptive Elastic Net (OAENet) OAENet is explicitly designed for making robust causal inference decisions using matching techniques. Numerical experiments on simulated data demonstrate that OAENet significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-27T02:54:30Z)
• Reenvisioning Collaborative Filtering vs Matrix Factorization [65.74881520196762]
  Collaborative filtering models based on matrix factorization and learned similarities using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have gained significant attention in recent years. Announcement of ANNs within the recommendation ecosystem has been recently questioned, raising several comparisons in terms of efficiency and effectiveness. We show the potential these techniques may have on beyond-accuracy evaluation while analyzing effect on complementary evaluation dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T16:29:38Z)
• Ramifications of Approximate Posterior Inference for Bayesian Deep Learning in Adversarial and Out-of-Distribution Settings [7.476901945542385]
  We show that Bayesian deep learning models on certain occasions marginally outperform conventional neural networks. Preliminary investigations indicate the potential inherent role of bias due to choices of initialisation, architecture or activation functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T16:58:15Z)
• Differentiable Neural Input Search for Recommender Systems [26.88124270897381]
  Differentiable Neural Input Search (DNIS) is a method that searches for mixed feature embedding dimensions in a more flexible space. DNIS is model-agnostic and can be seamlessly incorporated with existing latent factor models for recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T10:43:59Z)
• Nonparametric inference for interventional effects with multiple mediators [0.0]
  We provide theory that allows for more flexible, possibly machine learning-based, estimation techniques. We demonstrate multiple robustness properties of the proposed estimators. Our work thus provides a means of leveraging modern statistical learning techniques in estimation of interventional mediation effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-16T19:05:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.