Vindication of entanglement-based witnesses of non-classicality in
hybrid systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10615v1
- Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:42:03 GMT
- Title: Vindication of entanglement-based witnesses of non-classicality in
hybrid systems
- Authors: Emanuele Marconato, Chiara Marletto
- Abstract summary: Vedral and one of us proposed an entanglement-based witness of non-classicality in systems that need not obey quantum theory.
Hall and Reginatto claimed that there are classical systems that can entangle two quantum systems, thus violating our proposed witness.
Here we refute that claim, explaining that the counterexample proposed by Hall and Reginatto in fact validates the witness.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recently, Vedral and one of us proposed an entanglement-based witness of
non-classicality in systems that need not obey quantum theory, based on
constructor-information-theoretic ideas, which offers a robust foundation for
recently proposed table-top tests of non-classicality in gravity. The witness
asserts that if a mediator can entangle locally two quantum systems, then it
has to be non-classical. Hall and Reginatto claimed that there are classical
systems that can entangle two quantum systems, thus violating our proposed
witness. Here we refute that claim, explaining that the counterexample proposed
by Hall and Reginatto in fact validates the witness, vindicating the witness of
non-classicality in its full generality.
Related papers
- On the Role of Locality in the Bose-Marletto-Vedral Effect [0.0]
Two of us recently proposed an entanglement-based witness of non-classicality.
In this note we discuss the role of locality as an assumption for the theorem supporting the witness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-02T15:28:50Z) - Hierarchical certification of nonclassical network correlations [50.32788626697182]
We derive linear and nonlinear Bell-like inequalities for networks, whose violation certifies the absence of a minimum number of classical sources in them.
We insert this assumption, which leads to results more amenable to certification in experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T18:00:01Z) - Lifting topological codes: Three-dimensional subsystem codes from two-dimensional anyon models [44.99833362998488]
Topological subsystem codes allow for quantum error correction with no time overhead, even in the presence of measurement noise.
We provide a systematic construction of a class of codes in three dimensions built from abelian quantum double models in one fewer dimension.
Our construction not only generalizes the recently introduced subsystem toric code, but also provides a new perspective on several aspects of the original model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-10T18:00:01Z) - Temporal witnesses of non-classicality and conservation laws [0.0]
A general entanglement-based witness of non-classicality has been proposed, which can be applied to testing quantum effects in gravity.
In this paper we provide a "temporal" variant of this witness, using a single quantum probe to assess the non-classicality of the mediator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-30T08:32:28Z) - Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information
theories [68.8204255655161]
We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory.
We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z) - Response to a comment on "Vindication of entanglement-based witnesses in
hybrid quantum systems" [0.0]
In a recent paper, we vindicated a general entanglement-based witness of non-classicality in hybrid quantum systems.
Hall and Reginatto recently commented, claiming to expose "a huge number of errors and misconceptions" in it.
But their comment contains no refutation of our arguments, nor does it expose any error or misconception in them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-30T14:31:21Z) - Comment on "Vindication of entanglement-based witnesses of
non-classicality in hybrid systems" [0.48733623015338234]
Models of quantum-classical interactions fall into two classes: those which allow the generation of entanglement via a classical mediator, and those which do not.
We show that known members of the first class fail to model the mediator as a 'classical' system, and are nonlocal.
It follows that there are models permitting the generation of entanglement via quantum-classical interactions that lie outside the remit of the theorem cited by Marconato and Marletto.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-09T10:18:35Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z) - Witnessing non-classicality beyond quantum theory [0.0]
We show that if a physical system can mediate locally the generation of entanglement between two quantum systems, then it itself must be non-classical.
We do not assume any classical or quantum formalism to describe the mediating physical system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-17T22:42:42Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.