Automation: An Essential Component Of Ethical AI?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15739v1
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 16:25:58 GMT
- Title: Automation: An Essential Component Of Ethical AI?
- Authors: Vivek Nallur and Martin Lloyd and Siani Pearson
- Abstract summary: Ethics is sometimes considered to be too abstract to be meaningfully implemented in artificial intelligence (AI)
In this paper, we reflect on other aspects of computing that were previously considered to be very abstract.
We wonder if ethical AI might be similarly achieved and advocate the process of automation as key step in making AI take ethical decisions.
- Score: 0.6445605125467572
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Ethics is sometimes considered to be too abstract to be meaningfully
implemented in artificial intelligence (AI). In this paper, we reflect on other
aspects of computing that were previously considered to be very abstract. Yet,
these are now accepted as being done very well by computers. These tasks have
ranged from multiple aspects of software engineering to mathematics to
conversation in natural language with humans. This was done by automating the
simplest possible step and then building on it to perform more complex tasks.
We wonder if ethical AI might be similarly achieved and advocate the process of
automation as key step in making AI take ethical decisions. The key
contribution of this paper is to reflect on how automation was introduced into
domains previously considered too abstract for computers.
Related papers
- Adaptation of XAI to Auto-tuning for Numerical Libraries [0.0]
Explainable AI (XAI) technology is gaining prominence, aiming to streamline AI model development and alleviate the burden of explaining AI outputs to users.
This research focuses on XAI for AI models when integrated into two different processes for practical numerical computations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-12T09:00:56Z) - A Bibliometric View of AI Ethics Development [4.0998481751764]
We perform a bibliometric analysis of AI Ethics literature for the last 20 years based on keyword search.
We conjecture that the next phase of AI ethics is likely to focus on making AI more machine-like as AI matches or surpasses humans intellectually.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T16:36:55Z) - AI in Software Engineering: A Survey on Project Management Applications [3.156791351998142]
Machine Learning (ML) employs algorithms that undergo training on data sets, enabling them to carry out specific tasks autonomously.
AI holds immense potential in the field of software engineering, particularly in project management and planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-27T23:02:24Z) - Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research.
An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system.
We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z) - Enabling Automated Machine Learning for Model-Driven AI Engineering [60.09869520679979]
We propose a novel approach to enable Model-Driven Software Engineering and Model-Driven AI Engineering.
In particular, we support Automated ML, thus assisting software engineers without deep AI knowledge in developing AI-intensive systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-06T10:12:56Z) - On some Foundational Aspects of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [52.03866242565846]
There is no clear definition of what is meant by Human Centered Artificial Intelligence.
This paper introduces the term HCAI agent to refer to any physical or software computational agent equipped with AI components.
We see the notion of HCAI agent, together with its components and functions, as a way to bridge the technical and non-technical discussions on human-centered AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-29T09:58:59Z) - A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in
Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect.
The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Hybrid Intelligence [4.508830262248694]
We argue that the most likely paradigm for the division of labor between humans and machines in the next decades is Hybrid Intelligence.
This concept aims at using the complementary strengths of human intelligence and AI, so that they can perform better than each of the two could separately.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-03T08:56:09Z) - Time for AI (Ethics) Maturity Model Is Now [15.870654219935972]
This paper argues that AI software is still software and needs to be approached from the software development perspective.
We wish to discuss whether the focus should be on AI ethics or, more broadly, the quality of an AI system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-29T17:37:44Z) - Learning from Learning Machines: Optimisation, Rules, and Social Norms [91.3755431537592]
It appears that the area of AI that is most analogous to the behaviour of economic entities is that of morally good decision-making.
Recent successes of deep learning for AI suggest that more implicit specifications work better than explicit ones for solving such problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-29T17:42:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.