Implementing an expert system to evaluate technical solutions
innovativeness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05407v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:11:44 GMT
- Title: Implementing an expert system to evaluate technical solutions
innovativeness
- Abstract summary: The paper presents a possible solution to the problem of algorithmization for quantifying inno-vativeness indicators of technical products, inventions and technologies.
The concepts of technological nov-elty, relevance and implementability as components of product innovation criterion are introduced.
Authors propose a model and algorithm to calculate every of these indicators of innovativeness under conditions of incompleteness and inaccuracy.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The paper presents a possible solution to the problem of algorithmization for
quantifying inno-vativeness indicators of technical products, inventions and
technologies. The concepts of technological nov-elty, relevance and
implementability as components of product innovation criterion are introduced.
Authors propose a model and algorithm to calculate every of these indicators of
innovativeness under conditions of incompleteness and inaccuracy, and sometimes
inconsistency of the initial information. The paper describes the developed
specialized software that is a promising methodological tool for using interval
estimations in accordance with the theory of evidence. These estimations are
used in the analysis of complex multicomponent systems, aggregations of large
volumes of fuzzy and incomplete data of various structures. Composition and
structure of a multi-agent expert system are presented. The purpose of such
system is to process groups of measurement results and to estimate indicators
values of objects innovativeness. The paper defines active elements of the
system, their functionality, roles, interaction order, input and output
inter-faces, as well as the general software functioning algorithm. It
describes implementation of software modules and gives an example of solving a
specific problem to determine the level of technical products innovation.
Related papers
- EVA-MILP: Towards Standardized Evaluation of MILP Instance Generation [13.49043811341421]
Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) is fundamental to solving complex decision-making problems.<n>The proliferation of MILP instance generation methods, driven by machine learning's demand for diverse datasets, has significantly outpaced standardized evaluation techniques.<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark framework designed for the systematic and objective evaluation of MILP instance generation methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T16:42:15Z) - PyTDC: A multimodal machine learning training, evaluation, and inference platform for biomedical foundation models [59.17570021208177]
PyTDC is a machine-learning platform providing streamlined training, evaluation, and inference software for multimodal biological AI models.<n>This paper discusses the components of PyTDC's architecture and, to our knowledge, the first-of-its-kind case study on the introduced single-cell drug-target nomination ML task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T18:15:38Z) - A Survey on (M)LLM-Based GUI Agents [62.57899977018417]
Graphical User Interface (GUI) Agents have emerged as a transformative paradigm in human-computer interaction.
Recent advances in large language models and multimodal learning have revolutionized GUI automation across desktop, mobile, and web platforms.
This survey identifies key technical challenges, including accurate element localization, effective knowledge retrieval, long-horizon planning, and safety-aware execution control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T17:58:31Z) - From Principles to Applications: A Comprehensive Survey of Discrete Tokenizers in Generation, Comprehension, Recommendation, and Information Retrieval [34.353945607932204]
discrete tokenizers have emerged as indispensable components in modern machine learning systems.
This paper provides a systematic review of the design principles, applications, and challenges of discrete tokenizers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T02:29:51Z) - A Survey on Inference Optimization Techniques for Mixture of Experts Models [50.40325411764262]
Large-scale Mixture of Experts (MoE) models offer enhanced model capacity and computational efficiency through conditional computation.
deploying and running inference on these models presents significant challenges in computational resources, latency, and energy efficiency.
This survey analyzes optimization techniques for MoE models across the entire system stack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T14:11:15Z) - What Does Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Actually Tell Us? A Case for Compositional and Contextual Validation of XAI Building Blocks [16.795332276080888]
We propose a fine-grained validation framework for explainable artificial intelligence systems.
We recognise their inherent modular structure: technical building blocks, user-facing explanatory artefacts and social communication protocols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T13:45:34Z) - Charting a Path to Efficient Onboarding: The Role of Software
Visualization [49.1574468325115]
The present study aims to explore the familiarity of managers, leaders, and developers with software visualization tools.
This approach incorporated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected from practitioners using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-17T21:30:45Z) - Interactive Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization of Software
Architectures [0.0]
Putting the human in the loop brings new challenges to the search-based software engineering field.
This paper explores how the interactive evolutionary computation can serve as a basis for integrating the human's judgment into the search process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-08T19:15:40Z) - Embedding in Recommender Systems: A Survey [54.55152033023537]
This survey presents a comprehensive analysis of advances in recommender system embedding techniques.<n>In matrix-based scenarios, collaborative filtering generates embeddings that effectively model user-item preferences.<n>We introduce emerging approaches, including AutoML, hashing techniques, and quantization methods, to enhance performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-28T06:31:06Z) - NeuroBench: A Framework for Benchmarking Neuromorphic Computing Algorithms and Systems [50.101188703826686]
We present NeuroBench: a benchmark framework for neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems.
NeuroBench is a collaboratively-designed effort from an open community of researchers across industry and academia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-10T15:12:09Z) - GLUECons: A Generic Benchmark for Learning Under Constraints [102.78051169725455]
In this work, we create a benchmark that is a collection of nine tasks in the domains of natural language processing and computer vision.
We model external knowledge as constraints, specify the sources of the constraints for each task, and implement various models that use these constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T16:45:36Z) - On Robust Numerical Solver for ODE via Self-Attention Mechanism [82.95493796476767]
We explore training efficient and robust AI-enhanced numerical solvers with a small data size by mitigating intrinsic noise disturbances.
We first analyze the ability of the self-attention mechanism to regulate noise in supervised learning and then propose a simple-yet-effective numerical solver, Attr, which introduces an additive self-attention mechanism to the numerical solution of differential equations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-05T01:39:21Z) - Time-Series Pattern Recognition in Smart Manufacturing Systems: A
Literature Review and Ontology [3.5097082077065003]
This paper provides a structured perspective of the current state of time-series pattern recognition in manufacturing.
It aims to provide practical and actionable guidelines for application and recommendations for advancing time-series analytics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-29T17:18:59Z) - An Ontology for Defect Detection in Metal Additive Manufacturing [3.997680012976965]
Key for Industry 4.0 applications is to develop control systems capable of addressing data integration and semantic interoperability issues.
We provide the classification of process-induced defects known from the metal additive manufacturing literature.
Our knowledge base aims at enhancing the capabilities of additive manufacturing by adding further defect analysis terminology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-29T13:35:25Z) - An Extensible Benchmark Suite for Learning to Simulate Physical Systems [60.249111272844374]
We introduce a set of benchmark problems to take a step towards unified benchmarks and evaluation protocols.
We propose four representative physical systems, as well as a collection of both widely used classical time-based and representative data-driven methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-09T17:39:09Z) - Test and Evaluation Framework for Multi-Agent Systems of Autonomous
Intelligent Agents [0.0]
We consider the challenges of developing a unifying test and evaluation framework for complex ensembles of cyber-physical systems with embedded artificial intelligence.
We propose a framework that incorporates test and evaluation throughout not only the development life cycle, but continues into operation as the system learns and adapts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-25T21:42:27Z) - A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classification [52.879658637466605]
We develop a list of diagnostic properties for evaluating existing explainability techniques.
We compare the saliency scores assigned by the explainability techniques with human annotations of salient input regions to find relations between a model's performance and the agreement of its rationales with human ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-25T12:01:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.