A recipe for annotating grounded clarifications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08964v1
• Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 21:47:48 GMT
• Title: A recipe for annotating grounded clarifications
• Authors: Luciana Benotti and Patrick Blackburn
• Abstract summary: We argue that dialogue clarification mechanisms make explicit the process of interpreting the communicative intents of the speaker's utterances. This paper frames dialogue clarification mechanisms as an understudied research problem and a key missing piece in the giant jigsaw puzzle of natural language understanding.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In order to interpret the communicative intents of an utterance, it needs to be grounded in something that is outside of language; that is, grounded in world modalities. In this paper, we argue that dialogue clarification mechanisms make explicit the process of interpreting the communicative intents of the speaker's utterances by grounding them in the various modalities in which the dialogue is situated. This paper frames dialogue clarification mechanisms as an understudied research problem and a key missing piece in the giant jigsaw puzzle of natural language understanding. We discuss both the theoretical background and practical challenges posed by this problem and propose a recipe for obtaining grounding annotations. We conclude by highlighting ethical issues that need to be addressed in future work.

Related papers

• Towards Harnessing Large Language Models for Comprehension of Conversational Grounding [1.8434042562191812]
  This study investigates the capabilities of large language models in classifying dialogue turns related to explicit or implicit grounding and predicting grounded knowledge elements. Our experimental results reveal challenges encountered by large language models in the two tasks. These initiatives aim to develop more effective dialogue systems that are better equipped to handle the intricacies of grounded knowledge in conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T19:34:39Z)
• Red Teaming Language Models for Processing Contradictory Dialogues [30.522961490270532]
  Most language models currently available are prone to self-contradiction during dialogues. This study explores a novel contradictory dialogue processing task that aims to detect and modify contradictory statements in a conversation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T14:27:32Z)
• Improving Speaker Diarization using Semantic Information: Joint Pairwise Constraints Propagation [53.01238689626378]
  We propose a novel approach to leverage semantic information in speaker diarization systems. We introduce spoken language understanding modules to extract speaker-related semantic information. We present a novel framework to integrate these constraints into the speaker diarization pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T09:13:30Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)
• Revisiting Conversation Discourse for Dialogue Disentanglement [88.3386821205896]
  We propose enhancing dialogue disentanglement by taking full advantage of the dialogue discourse characteristics. We develop a structure-aware framework to integrate the rich structural features for better modeling the conversational semantic context. Our work has great potential to facilitate broader multi-party multi-thread dialogue applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T19:17:47Z)
• Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph Modeling over Key Utterances for Dialogue Reading Comprehension [61.55950233402972]
  We propose a new key utterances extracting method for dialogue reading comprehension. It performs prediction on the unit formed by several contiguous utterances, which can realize more answer-contained utterances. As a graph constructed on the text of utterances, we then propose Question-Interlocutor Scope Realized Graph (QuISG) modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T04:00:42Z)
• Speaker-Oriented Latent Structures for Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction [10.381257436462116]
  We introduce SOLS, a novel model which can explicitly induce speaker-oriented latent structures for better DiaRE. Specifically, we learn latent structures to capture the relationships among tokens beyond the utterance boundaries. During the learning process, our speaker-specific regularization method progressively highlights speaker-related key clues and erases the irrelevant ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-11T04:24:51Z)
• Who Responded to Whom: The Joint Effects of Latent Topics and Discourse in Conversation Structure [53.77234444565652]
  We identify the responding relations in the conversation discourse, which link response utterances to their initiations. We propose a model to learn latent topics and discourse in word distributions, and predict pairwise initiation-response links. Experimental results on both English and Chinese conversations show that our model significantly outperforms the previous state of the arts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T17:46:00Z)
• Advances in Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension: A Survey [51.215629336320305]
  We review the previous methods from the perspective of dialogue modeling. We discuss three typical patterns of dialogue modeling that are widely-used in dialogue comprehension tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T15:50:17Z)
• Utterance-level Dialogue Understanding: An Empirical Study [43.35258958775454]
  This paper explores and quantify the role of context for different aspects of a dialogue. Specifically, we employ various perturbations to distort the context of a given utterance. This provides us with insights into the fundamental contextual controlling factors of different aspects of a dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T09:50:21Z)
• Discourse Coherence, Reference Grounding and Goal Oriented Dialogue [15.766916122461922]
  We argue for a new approach to realizing mixed-initiative human--computer referential communication. We describe a simple dialogue system in a referential communication domain that accumulates constraints across discourse, interprets them using a learned probabilistic model, and plans clarification using reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T20:53:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.