Classifying Argumentative Relations Using Logical Mechanisms and Argumentation Schemes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07571v1
• Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 01:41:39 GMT
• Title: Classifying Argumentative Relations Using Logical Mechanisms and Argumentation Schemes
• Authors: Yohan Jo, Seojin Bang, Chris Reed, Eduard Hovy
• Abstract summary: We classify argumentative relations based on four logical and theory-informed mechanisms between two statements. We demonstrate that our operationalization of these logical mechanisms classifies argumentative relations without directly training on data labeled with the relations.
• Score: 6.212955085775758
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While argument mining has achieved significant success in classifying argumentative relations between statements (support, attack, and neutral), we have a limited computational understanding of logical mechanisms that constitute those relations. Most recent studies rely on black-box models, which are not as linguistically insightful as desired. On the other hand, earlier studies use rather simple lexical features, missing logical relations between statements. To overcome these limitations, our work classifies argumentative relations based on four logical and theory-informed mechanisms between two statements, namely (i) factual consistency, (ii) sentiment coherence, (iii) causal relation, and (iv) normative relation. We demonstrate that our operationalization of these logical mechanisms classifies argumentative relations without directly training on data labeled with the relations, significantly better than several unsupervised baselines. We further demonstrate that these mechanisms also improve supervised classifiers through representation learning.

Related papers

• Learning Complete Topology-Aware Correlations Between Relations for Inductive Link Prediction [121.65152276851619]
  We show that semantic correlations between relations are inherently edge-level and entity-independent. We propose a novel subgraph-based method, namely TACO, to model Topology-Aware COrrelations between relations. To further exploit the potential of RCN, we propose Complete Common Neighbor induced subgraph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T08:11:58Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Explanation: On Causal Rationalization [9.48539398357156]
  We propose a new model of rationalization based on two causal desiderata, non-spuriousness and efficiency. The superior performance of the proposed causal rationalization is demonstrated on real-world review and medical datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T03:34:06Z)
• Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension [80.99865844249106]
  We propose a holistic graph network (HGN) which deals with context at both discourse level and word level, as the basis for logical reasoning. Specifically, node-level and type-level relations, which can be interpreted as bridges in the reasoning process, are modeled by a hierarchical interaction mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T07:34:27Z)
• Discourse-Aware Graph Networks for Textual Logical Reasoning [142.0097357999134]
  Passage-level logical relations represent entailment or contradiction between propositional units (e.g., a concluding sentence) We propose logic structural-constraint modeling to solve the logical reasoning QA and introduce discourse-aware graph networks (DAGNs) The networks first construct logic graphs leveraging in-line discourse connectives and generic logic theories, then learn logic representations by end-to-end evolving the logic relations with an edge-reasoning mechanism and updating the graph features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T14:38:49Z)
• Exploring Discourse Structures for Argument Impact Classification [48.909640432326654]
  This paper empirically shows that the discourse relations between two arguments along the context path are essential factors for identifying the persuasive power of an argument. We propose DisCOC to inject and fuse the sentence-level structural information with contextualized features derived from large-scale language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T06:49:19Z)
• Topology-Aware Correlations Between Relations for Inductive Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphs [41.38172189254483]
  TACT is inspired by the observation that the semantic correlation between two relations is highly correlated to their topological knowledge graphs. We categorize all relation pairs into several topological patterns then propose a structure in Correlation Network (RCN) to learn the importance of the different patterns for inductive link prediction. Experiments demonstrate that TACT can effectively model semantic correlations between relations, and significantly outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T13:00:10Z)
• Learning to Decouple Relations: Few-Shot Relation Classification with Entity-Guided Attention and Confusion-Aware Training [49.9995628166064]
  We propose CTEG, a model equipped with two mechanisms to learn to decouple easily-confused relations. On the one hand, an EGA mechanism is introduced to guide the attention to filter out information causing confusion. On the other hand, a Confusion-Aware Training (CAT) method is proposed to explicitly learn to distinguish relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-21T11:07:53Z)
• High-order Semantic Role Labeling [86.29371274587146]
  This paper introduces a high-order graph structure for the neural semantic role labeling model. It enables the model to explicitly consider not only the isolated predicate-argument pairs but also the interaction between the predicate-argument pairs. Experimental results on 7 languages of the CoNLL-2009 benchmark show that the high-order structural learning techniques are beneficial to the strong performing SRL models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T15:33:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.