Correlations Between Learning Environments and Dropout Intention

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07856v1
• Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 10:08:47 GMT
• Title: Correlations Between Learning Environments and Dropout Intention
• Authors: Edward Simmons
• Abstract summary: This research is comparing learning environments to students dropout intentions. While using statistics I looked at data and the correlations between two articles to see how the two studies looked side to side.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This research is comparing learning environments to students dropout intentions. While using statistics I looked at data and the correlations between two articles to see how the two studies looked side to side. Learning environments and dropout intentions can both have vary effects on students. They can both determine if a student does well, or bad in school especially math.

Related papers

• Detecting Unsuccessful Students in Cybersecurity Exercises in Two Different Learning Environments [0.37729165787434493]
  This paper develops automated tools to predict when a student is having difficulty. In a potential application, such models can aid instructors in detecting struggling students and providing targeted help.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T04:57:54Z)
• A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance Predictions in Online Courses using Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs [0.0]
  We analyze a heterogeneous knowledge graph consisting of students, course videos, formative assessments and their interactions to predict student performance. We then compare the models generated between 5 on-campus and 2 fully-online MOOC-style instances of the same course. The model developed achieved a 70-90% accuracy of predicting whether a student would pass a particular problem set based on content consumed, course instance, and modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T03:33:59Z)
• Student Teacher Interaction While Learning Computer Science: Early Results from an Experiment on Undergraduates [0.0]
  The scope of this paper was to find out how the students in Computer Science perceive different teaching styles. Students prefer a more interactive course, with a relaxing atmosphere, and are keener to learn in these conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T19:08:59Z)
• Protected Attributes Tell Us Who, Behavior Tells Us How: A Comparison of Demographic and Behavioral Oversampling for Fair Student Success Modeling [6.58879009604603]
  We analyze the fairness of models which use behavioral data to identify at-risk students and suggest two novel pre-processing approaches for bias mitigation. Based on the concept of intersectionality, the first approach involves intelligent oversampling on combinations of demographic attributes. The second approach does not require any knowledge of demographic attributes and is based on the assumption that such attributes are a (noisy) proxy for student behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T11:09:11Z)
• Student-centric Model of Learning Management System Activity and Academic Performance: from Correlation to Causation [2.169383034643496]
  In recent years, there is a lot of interest in modeling students' digital traces in Learning Management System (LMS) to understand students' learning behavior patterns. This paper explores a student-centric analytical framework for LMS activity data that can provide not only correlational but causal insights mined from observational data. We envision that those insights will provide convincing evidence for college student support groups to launch student-centered and targeted interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T14:08:25Z)
• Dual Space Graph Contrastive Learning [82.81372024482202]
  We propose a novel graph contrastive learning method, namely textbfDual textbfSpace textbfGraph textbfContrastive (DSGC) Learning. Since both spaces have their own advantages to represent graph data in the embedding spaces, we hope to utilize graph contrastive learning to bridge the spaces and leverage advantages from both sides.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-19T04:10:29Z)
• CoCon: Cooperative-Contrastive Learning [52.342936645996765]
  Self-supervised visual representation learning is key for efficient video analysis. Recent success in learning image representations suggests contrastive learning is a promising framework to tackle this challenge. We introduce a cooperative variant of contrastive learning to utilize complementary information across views.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T05:46:02Z)
• Robust Audio-Visual Instance Discrimination [79.74625434659443]
  We present a self-supervised learning method to learn audio and video representations. We address the problems of audio-visual instance discrimination and improve transfer learning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-29T19:52:29Z)
• Revealing the Hidden Patterns: A Comparative Study on Profiling Subpopulations of MOOC Students [61.58283466715385]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) exhibit a remarkable heterogeneity of students. The advent of complex "big data" from MOOC platforms is a challenging yet rewarding opportunity to deeply understand how students are engaged in MOOCs. We report on clustering analysis of student activities and comparative analysis on both behavioral patterns and demographical patterns between student subpopulations in the MOOC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-12T10:38:50Z)
• Few-shot Visual Reasoning with Meta-analogical Contrastive Learning [141.2562447971]
  We propose to solve a few-shot (or low-shot) visual reasoning problem, by resorting to analogical reasoning. We extract structural relationships between elements in both domains, and enforce them to be as similar as possible with analogical learning. We validate our method on RAVEN dataset, on which it outperforms state-of-the-art method, with larger gains when the training data is scarce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T14:00:34Z)
• Learning to Compare Relation: Semantic Alignment for Few-Shot Learning [48.463122399494175]
  We present a novel semantic alignment model to compare relations, which is robust to content misalignment. We conduct extensive experiments on several few-shot learning datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T08:37:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.