Topic-Aware Evidence Reasoning and Stance-Aware Aggregation for Fact Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01191v1
• Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:33:12 GMT
• Title: Topic-Aware Evidence Reasoning and Stance-Aware Aggregation for Fact Verification
• Authors: Jiasheng Si, Deyu Zhou, Tongzhe Li, Xingyu Shi, Yulan He
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel topic-aware evidence reasoning and stance-aware aggregation model for fact verification. Tests conducted on two benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model over several state-of-the-art approaches for fact verification.
• Score: 19.130541561303293
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Fact verification is a challenging task that requires simultaneously reasoning and aggregating over multiple retrieved pieces of evidence to evaluate the truthfulness of a claim. Existing approaches typically (i) explore the semantic interaction between the claim and evidence at different granularity levels but fail to capture their topical consistency during the reasoning process, which we believe is crucial for verification; (ii) aggregate multiple pieces of evidence equally without considering their implicit stances to the claim, thereby introducing spurious information. To alleviate the above issues, we propose a novel topic-aware evidence reasoning and stance-aware aggregation model for more accurate fact verification, with the following four key properties: 1) checking topical consistency between the claim and evidence; 2) maintaining topical coherence among multiple pieces of evidence; 3) ensuring semantic similarity between the global topic information and the semantic representation of evidence; 4) aggregating evidence based on their implicit stances to the claim. Extensive experiments conducted on the two benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model over several state-of-the-art approaches for fact verification. The source code can be obtained from https://github.com/jasenchn/TARSA.

Related papers

• Evidence-Based Temporal Fact Verification [15.698391632115856]
  We propose an end-to-end solution for temporal fact verification that considers the temporal information in claims to obtain relevant evidence sentences. We learn time-sensitive representations that encapsulate not only the semantic relationships among the events, but also their chronological proximity. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly enhances the accuracy of temporal claim verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T23:13:05Z)
• Navigating the Noisy Crowd: Finding Key Information for Claim Verification [19.769771741059408]
  We propose EACon, a framework designed to find key information within evidence and verify each aspect of a claim separately. Eccon finds keywords from the claim and employs fuzzy matching to select relevant keywords for each raw evidence piece. Eccon deconstructs the original claim into subclaims, which are then verified against both abstracted and raw evidence individually.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T09:24:10Z)
• EX-FEVER: A Dataset for Multi-hop Explainable Fact Verification [22.785622371421876]
  We present a pioneering dataset for multi-hop explainable fact verification. With over 60,000 claims involving 2-hop and 3-hop reasoning, each is created by summarizing and modifying information from hyperlinked Wikipedia documents. We demonstrate a novel baseline system on our EX-FEVER dataset, showcasing document retrieval, explanation generation, and claim verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T06:46:15Z)
• Give Me More Details: Improving Fact-Checking with Latent Retrieval [58.706972228039604]
  Evidence plays a crucial role in automated fact-checking. Existing fact-checking systems either assume the evidence sentences are given or use the search snippets returned by the search engine. We propose to incorporate full text from source documents as evidence and introduce two enriched datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T15:01:19Z)
• Decker: Double Check with Heterogeneous Knowledge for Commonsense Fact Verification [80.31112722910787]
  We propose Decker, a commonsense fact verification model that is capable of bridging heterogeneous knowledge. Experimental results on two commonsense fact verification benchmark datasets, CSQA2.0 and CREAK demonstrate the effectiveness of our Decker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T06:28:16Z)
• Read it Twice: Towards Faithfully Interpretable Fact Verification by Revisiting Evidence [59.81749318292707]
  We propose a fact verification model named ReRead to retrieve evidence and verify claim. The proposed system is able to achieve significant improvements upon best-reported models under different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T03:23:14Z)
• Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claims [64.81832149826035]
  We focus on decomposing a complex claim into a comprehensive set of yes-no subquestions whose answers influence the veracity of the claim. We present ClaimDecomp, a dataset of decompositions for over 1000 claims. We show that these subquestions can help identify relevant evidence to fact-check the full claim and derive the veracity through their answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-14T00:40:57Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)
• AmbiFC: Fact-Checking Ambiguous Claims with Evidence [57.7091560922174]
  We present AmbiFC, a fact-checking dataset with 10k claims derived from real-world information needs. We analyze disagreements arising from ambiguity when comparing claims against evidence in AmbiFC. We develop models for predicting veracity handling this ambiguity via soft labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-01T17:40:08Z)
• Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling for Automated Fact Extraction and Verification [5.836068916903788]
  Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling (HESM) is a framework to extract evidence sets and verify a claim to be supported, refuted or not enough info. Our experimental results show that HESM outperforms 7 state-of-the-art methods for fact extraction and claim verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-10T22:27:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.