Machine learning in the social and health sciences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10716v1
• Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 15:48:45 GMT
• Title: Machine learning in the social and health sciences
• Authors: Anja K. Leist, Matthias Klee, Jung Hyun Kim, David H. Rehkopf, St\'ephane P. A. Bordas, Graciela Muniz-Terrera, Sara Wade
• Abstract summary: This paper provides a meta-mapping of research questions in the social and health sciences to appropriate machine learning approaches. We map the established classification into description, prediction, and causal inference to common research goals.
• Score: 0.8681909776958184
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The uptake of machine learning (ML) approaches in the social and health sciences has been rather slow, and research using ML for social and health research questions remains fragmented. This may be due to the separate development of research in the computational/data versus social and health sciences as well as a lack of accessible overviews and adequate training in ML techniques for non data science researchers. This paper provides a meta-mapping of research questions in the social and health sciences to appropriate ML approaches, by incorporating the necessary requirements to statistical analysis in these disciplines. We map the established classification into description, prediction, and causal inference to common research goals, such as estimating prevalence of adverse health or social outcomes, predicting the risk of an event, and identifying risk factors or causes of adverse outcomes. This meta-mapping aims at overcoming disciplinary barriers and starting a fluid dialogue between researchers from the social and health sciences and methodologically trained researchers. Such mapping may also help to fully exploit the benefits of ML while considering domain-specific aspects relevant to the social and health sciences, and hopefully contribute to the acceleration of the uptake of ML applications to advance both basic and applied social and health sciences research.

Related papers

• Knowing Your Uncertainty -- On the application of LLM in social sciences [37.703249716862054]
  Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being integrated into computational social science research.<n>This article argues that applying LLMs to social scientific tasks requires explicit assessment of uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T06:36:15Z)
• Social Simulations with Large Language Model Risk Utopian Illusion [61.358959720048354]
  We introduce a systematic framework for analyzing large language models' behavior in social simulation.<n>Our approach simulates multi-agent interactions through chatroom-style conversations and analyzes them across five linguistic dimensions.<n>Our findings reveal that LLMs do not faithfully reproduce genuine human behavior but instead reflect overly idealized versions of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T06:08:41Z)
• Social Genome: Grounded Social Reasoning Abilities of Multimodal Models [61.88413918026431]
  Social Genome is the first benchmark for fine-grained, grounded social reasoning abilities of multimodal models. It contains 272 videos of interactions and 1,486 human-annotated reasoning traces related to inferences about these interactions. Social Genome is also the first modeling challenge to study external knowledge in social reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T00:05:40Z)
• Position: Evaluating Generative AI Systems Is a Social Science Measurement Challenge [78.35388859345056]
  We argue that the ML community would benefit from learning from and drawing on the social sciences when developing measurement instruments for evaluating GenAI systems.<n>We present a four-level framework, grounded in measurement theory from the social sciences, for measuring concepts related to the capabilities, behaviors, and impacts of GenAI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T21:09:51Z)
• Evaluating Generative AI Systems is a Social Science Measurement Challenge [78.35388859345056]
  We present a framework for measuring concepts related to the capabilities, impacts, opportunities, and risks of GenAI systems. The framework distinguishes between four levels: the background concept, the systematized concept, the measurement instrument(s), and the instance-level measurements themselves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T02:35:30Z)
• Intelligent Computing Social Modeling and Methodological Innovations in Political Science in the Era of Large Language Models [16.293574791587247]
  This paper proposes the "Intelligent Computing Social Modeling" (ICSM) method to address these issues. By simulating the U.S. presidential election, this study empirically demonstrates the operational pathways and methodological advantages of ICSM. The findings suggest that LLMs will drive methodological innovation in political science through integration and improvement rather than direct substitution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T06:30:59Z)
• Intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media: A bibliometric analysis [1.8020166013859684]
  Inaccurate shared information causes confusion, can adversely affect mental health, and can lead to mis-informed decision-making. This study explores the typology of intervention strategies for addressing misinformation sharing on social media. It identifies 4 important clusters - cognition-based, automated-based, information-based, and hybrid-based.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T08:38:15Z)
• The Impact of Machine Learning on Society: An Analysis of Current Trends and Future Implications [0.0]
  This research aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the current and future impact of Machine learning on society. The research included a thorough literature review, case studies, and surveys to gather data on the economic impact of ML, ethical and privacy implications, and public perceptions of the technology. The findings of this research revealed that the majority of respondents have a moderate level of familiarity with the concept of ML, believe that it has the potential to benefit society, and think that society should prioritize the development and use of ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T01:10:09Z)
• Data Science for Social Good [2.8621556092850065]
  We present a framework for "data science for social good" (DSSG) research. We perform an analysis of the literature to empirically demonstrate the paucity of work on DSSG in information systems. We hope that this article and the special issue will spur future DSSG research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T15:40:20Z)
• DeSIQ: Towards an Unbiased, Challenging Benchmark for Social Intelligence Understanding [60.84356161106069]
  We study the soundness of Social-IQ, a dataset of multiple-choice questions on videos of complex social interactions. Our analysis reveals that Social-IQ contains substantial biases, which can be exploited by a moderately strong language model. We introduce DeSIQ, a new challenging dataset, constructed by applying simple perturbations to Social-IQ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T06:21:34Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning for Social Good: Reframing the Adversary as an Ally [50.92232179802755]
  AdvML for Social Good (AdvML4G) is an emerging field that repurposes the AdvML bug to invent pro-social applications. This paper provides the first comprehensive review of the emerging field of AdvML4G.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T15:49:04Z)
• SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Models [70.5763210869525]
  We introduce an expansive benchmark suite SciBench for Large Language Model (LLM) SciBench contains a dataset featuring a range of collegiate-level scientific problems from mathematics, chemistry, and physics domains. The results reveal that the current LLMs fall short of delivering satisfactory performance, with the best overall score of merely 43.22%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T07:01:57Z)
• Use and Misuse of Machine Learning in Anthropology [0.9786690381850356]
  We will focus on the field of paleoanthropology, which seeks to understand the evolution of the human species based on biological and cultural evidence. The aim of this paper is to provide a brief introduction to some of the ways in which ML has been applied within paleoanthropology. We discuss a series of missteps, errors, and violations of correct protocols of ML methods that appear disconcertingly often within the accumulating body of anthropological literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T20:32:24Z)
• Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review [90.22219142430146]
  We analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities. We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint. We propose several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T04:32:10Z)
• Machine Learning in Nano-Scale Biomedical Engineering [77.75587007080894]
  We review the existing research regarding the use of machine learning in nano-scale biomedical engineering. The main challenges that can be formulated as ML problems are classified into the three main categories. For each of the presented methodologies, special emphasis is given to its principles, applications, and limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T15:45:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.