Intelligent Computing Social Modeling and Methodological Innovations in Political Science in the Era of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16301v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 06:30:59 GMT
• Title: Intelligent Computing Social Modeling and Methodological Innovations in Political Science in the Era of Large Language Models
• Authors: Zhenyu Wang, Yi Xu, Dequan Wang, Lingfeng Zhou, Yiqi Zhou,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes the "Intelligent Computing Social Modeling" (ICSM) method to address these issues. By simulating the U.S. presidential election, this study empirically demonstrates the operational pathways and methodological advantages of ICSM. The findings suggest that LLMs will drive methodological innovation in political science through integration and improvement rather than direct substitution.
• Score: 16.293574791587247
• License:
• Abstract: The recent wave of artificial intelligence, epitomized by large language models (LLMs), has presented opportunities and challenges for methodological innovation in political science, sparking discussions on a potential paradigm shift in the social sciences. However, how can we understand the impact of LLMs on knowledge production and paradigm transformation in the social sciences from a comprehensive perspective that integrates technology and methodology? What are LLMs' specific applications and representative innovative methods in political science research? These questions, particularly from a practical methodological standpoint, remain underexplored. This paper proposes the "Intelligent Computing Social Modeling" (ICSM) method to address these issues by clarifying the critical mechanisms of LLMs. ICSM leverages the strengths of LLMs in idea synthesis and action simulation, advancing intellectual exploration in political science through "simulated social construction" and "simulation validation." By simulating the U.S. presidential election, this study empirically demonstrates the operational pathways and methodological advantages of ICSM. By integrating traditional social science paradigms, ICSM not only enhances the quantitative paradigm's capability to apply big data to assess the impact of factors but also provides qualitative paradigms with evidence for social mechanism discovery at the individual level, offering a powerful tool that balances interpretability and predictability in social science research. The findings suggest that LLMs will drive methodological innovation in political science through integration and improvement rather than direct substitution.

Related papers

• Decoding Large-Language Models: A Systematic Overview of Socio-Technical Impacts, Constraints, and Emerging Questions [1.1970409518725493]
  The article highlights the application areas that could have a positive impact on society along with the ethical considerations. It includes responsible development considerations, algorithmic improvements, ethical challenges, and societal implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T14:36:30Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• LLM-Augmented Agent-Based Modelling for Social Simulations: Challenges and Opportunities [0.0]
  Integrating large language models with agent-based simulations offers a transformational potential for understanding complex social systems. We explore architectures and methods to systematically develop LLM-augmented social simulations. We conclude that integrating LLMs with agent-based simulations offers a powerful toolset for researchers and scientists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T08:57:54Z)
• Inadequacies of Large Language Model Benchmarks in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence [5.147767778946168]
  We critically assess 23 state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) benchmarks. Our research uncovered significant limitations, including biases, difficulties in measuring genuine reasoning, adaptability, implementation inconsistencies, prompt engineering complexity, diversity, and the overlooking of cultural and ideological norms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T11:08:10Z)
• Taking the Next Step with Generative Artificial Intelligence: The Transformative Role of Multimodal Large Language Models in Science Education [13.87944568193996]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are capable of processing multimodal data including text, sound, and visual inputs. This paper explores the transformative role of MLLMs in central aspects of science education by presenting exemplary innovative learning scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T18:11:43Z)
• Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology View [60.80731090755224]
  This paper probes the collaboration mechanisms among contemporary NLP systems by practical experiments with theoretical insights. We fabricate four unique societies' comprised of LLM agents, where each agent is characterized by a specific trait' (easy-going or overconfident) and engages in collaboration with a distinct thinking pattern' (debate or reflection) Our results further illustrate that LLM agents manifest human-like social behaviors, such as conformity and consensus reaching, mirroring social psychology theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T15:05:52Z)
• Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Models [65.44579542312489]
  Survey aims to provide researchers with a high-level insight into the similarities and differences of social bias studies in pre-trained models across NLP, CV, and VL. The findings and recommendations presented here can benefit the ML community, fostering the development of fairer and non-biased AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T15:34:56Z)
• Training Socially Aligned Language Models on Simulated Social Interactions [99.39979111807388]
  Social alignment in AI systems aims to ensure that these models behave according to established societal values. Current language models (LMs) are trained to rigidly replicate their training corpus in isolation. This work presents a novel training paradigm that permits LMs to learn from simulated social interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:17:36Z)
• Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
  We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology. We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table. It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z)
• Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication [6.485452733699873]
  We review approaches used in the behavioral and social sciences and in the DARPA SCORE project. We focus on the role of human forecasting of replication outcomes. We will discuss opportunities and challenges of using these approaches to monitor and improve the credibility of research areas in Computer Science, AI, and ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T01:41:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.