Intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media: A bibliometric analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17637v1
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 08:38:15 GMT
- Title: Intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media: A bibliometric analysis
- Authors: Juanita Zainudin, Nazlena Mohamad Ali, Alan F. Smeaton, Mohamad Taha Ijab,
- Abstract summary: Inaccurate shared information causes confusion, can adversely affect mental health, and can lead to mis-informed decision-making.
This study explores the typology of intervention strategies for addressing misinformation sharing on social media.
It identifies 4 important clusters - cognition-based, automated-based, information-based, and hybrid-based.
- Score: 1.8020166013859684
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Widely distributed misinformation shared across social media channels is a pressing issue that poses a significant threat to many aspects of society's well-being. Inaccurate shared information causes confusion, can adversely affect mental health, and can lead to mis-informed decision-making. Therefore, it is important to implement proactive measures to intervene and curb the spread of misinformation where possible. This has prompted scholars to investigate a variety of intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media. This study explores the typology of intervention strategies for addressing misinformation sharing on social media, identifying 4 important clusters - cognition-based, automated-based, information-based, and hybrid-based. The literature selection process utilized the PRISMA method to ensure a systematic and comprehensive analysis of relevant literature while maintaining transparency and reproducibility. A total of 139 articles published from 2013-2023 were then analyzed. Meanwhile, bibliometric analyses were conducted using performance analysis and science mapping techniques for the typology development. A comparative analysis of the typology was conducted to reveal patterns and evolution in the field. This provides valuable insights for both theory and practical applications. Overall, the study concludes that scholarly contributions to scientific research and publication help to address research gaps and expand knowledge in this field. Understanding the evolution of intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media can support future research that contributes to the development of more effective and sustainable solutions to this persistent problem.
Related papers
- Employing Social Media to Improve Mental Health Outcomes [16.03236334555092]
This chapter presents research conducted in the past decade that has harnessed social media data in the service of mental health and well-being.
The discussion is organized along three thrusts: a first that highlights how social media data has been utilized to detect and predict risk to varied mental health concerns; a second thrust that focuses on translation paradigms that can enable to use of such social media based algorithms in the real-world; and the final thrust that brings to the fore the ethical considerations and challenges that engender the conduct of this research as well as its translation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T23:41:24Z) - A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing.
Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z) - Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
Onologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data.
logical reasoning that can directly support are quite limited in learning, approximation and prediction.
One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z) - A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [55.33653554387953]
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) has led to numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and fragmented information.
This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field.
We try to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews; (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews; and (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z) - Connecting the Dots in News Analysis: Bridging the Cross-Disciplinary Disparities in Media Bias and Framing [34.41723666603066]
We argue that methodologies that are currently dominant fall short of addressing the complex questions and effects addressed in theoretical media studies.
We discuss open questions and suggest possible directions to close identified gaps between theory and predictive models, and their evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T23:57:55Z) - When Infodemic Meets Epidemic: a Systematic Literature Review [3.3454373538792543]
Social media offer significant amounts of data that can be leveraged for bio-surveillance.
This systematic literature review provides a methodical overview of the integration of social media in different epidemic-related contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-03T21:04:30Z) - Aggression and "hate speech" in communication of media users: analysis
of control capabilities [50.591267188664666]
Authors studied the possibilities of mutual influence of users in new media.
They found a high level of aggression and hate speech when discussing an urgent social problem - measures for COVID-19 fighting.
Results can be useful for developing media content in a modern digital environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-25T15:53:32Z) - Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and
Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation.
We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z) - Understanding Health Misinformation Transmission: An Interpretable Deep
Learning Approach to Manage Infodemics [6.08461198240039]
This study proposes a novel interpretable deep learning approach, Generative Adversarial Network based Piecewise Wide and Attention Deep Learning (GAN-PiWAD) to predict health misinformation transmission in social media.
We select features according to social exchange theory and evaluate GAN-PiWAD on 4,445 misinformation videos.
Our findings provide direct implications for social media platforms and policymakers to design proactive interventions to identify misinformation, control transmissions, and manage infodemics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-21T15:49:19Z) - Extracting a Knowledge Base of Mechanisms from COVID-19 Papers [50.17242035034729]
We pursue the construction of a knowledge base (KB) of mechanisms.
We develop a broad, unified schema that strikes a balance between relevance and breadth.
Experiments demonstrate the utility of our KB in supporting interdisciplinary scientific search over COVID-19 literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-08T07:54:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.