The Diagonal Distance of CWS Codes
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11286v2
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:43:36 GMT
- Title: The Diagonal Distance of CWS Codes
- Authors: Upendra S. Kapshikar
- Abstract summary: The diagonal distance of a quantum code is an important parameter that characterizes if the quantum code is degenerate or not.
We show that most of the CWS codes without a cycle of length four attain the upper bound of diagonal distance d+1.
We show that any degenerate CWS code with graph $G$ and classical code C will either have a short cycle in the graph $G$ or will be such that the classical code C has one of the coordinates trivially zero for all codewords.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Quantum degeneracy in error correction is a feature unique to quantum error
correcting codes, unlike their classical counterpart. It allows a quantum error
correcting code to correct errors even when they can not uniquely pinpoint the
error. The diagonal distance of a quantum code is an important parameter that
characterizes if the quantum code is degenerate or not. If code has a distance
more than the diagonal distance, then it is degenerate, whereas if it is below
the diagonal distance, then it is nondegenerate. We show that most of the CWS
codes without a cycle of length four attain the upper bound of diagonal
distance d+1, where d is the minimum vertex degree of the associated graph.
Addressing the question of degeneracy, we give necessary conditions on CWS
codes to be degenerate. We show that any degenerate CWS code with graph $G$ and
classical code C will either have a short cycle in the graph $G$ or will be
such that the classical code C has one of the coordinates trivially zero for
all codewords.
Related papers
- Quantum error correction beyond $SU(2)$: spin, bosonic, and permutation-invariant codes from convex geometry [48.254879700836376]
We develop a framework for constructing quantum error-correcting codes and logical gates for three types of spaces.<n>We prove that many codes and their gates in $SU(q)$ can be inter-converted between the three state spaces.<n>We present explicit constructions of codes with shorter length or lower total spin/excitation than known codes with similar parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-24T20:21:30Z) - Efficient and Universal Neural-Network Decoder for Stabilizer-Based Quantum Error Correction [44.698141103370546]
GraphQEC is a code-agnostic decoder leveraging machine-learning on the graph structure of stabilizer codes with linear time complexity.<n>Our approach represents the first universal solution for real-time quantum error correction across arbitrary stabilizer codes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T10:56:53Z) - Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold [107.92016014248976]
Quantum error correction provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit.
We present two surface code memories operating below a critical threshold: a distance-7 code and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder.
Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-24T23:08:50Z) - How much entanglement is needed for quantum error correction? [10.61261983484739]
It is commonly believed that logical states of quantum error-correcting codes have to be highly entangled.
Here we show that this belief may or may not be true depending on a particular code.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T14:35:55Z) - A family of permutationally invariant quantum codes [54.835469342984354]
We show that codes in the new family correct quantum deletion errors as well as spontaneous decay errors.
Our construction contains some of the previously known permutationally invariant quantum codes.
For small $t$, these conditions can be used to construct new examples of codes by computer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T02:37:23Z) - Deep Quantum Error Correction [73.54643419792453]
Quantum error correction codes (QECC) are a key component for realizing the potential of quantum computing.
In this work, we efficiently train novel emphend-to-end deep quantum error decoders.
The proposed method demonstrates the power of neural decoders for QECC by achieving state-of-the-art accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T08:16:26Z) - Quantum computation on a 19-qubit wide 2d nearest neighbour qubit array [59.24209911146749]
This paper explores the relationship between the width of a qubit lattice constrained in one dimension and physical thresholds.
We engineer an error bias at the lowest level of encoding using the surface code.
We then address this bias at a higher level of encoding using a lattice-surgery surface code bus.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-03T06:16:07Z) - On the Hardness of the Minimum Distance Problem of Quantum Codes [0.0]
We show that finding the minimum distance of stabilizer quantum codes exactly or approximately is NP-hard.
A main technical tool used for our result is a lower bound on the so-called graph state distance of 4-cycle free graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T18:33:43Z) - Quantum Error Correction with Gauge Symmetries [69.02115180674885]
Quantum simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories (LGTs) are often formulated on an enlarged Hilbert space containing both physical and unphysical sectors.
We provide simple fault-tolerant procedures that exploit such redundancy by combining a phase flip error correction code with the Gauss' law constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-09T19:29:34Z) - Realizing Repeated Quantum Error Correction in a Distance-Three Surface
Code [42.394110572265376]
We demonstrate quantum error correction using the surface code, which is known for its exceptionally high tolerance to errors.
In an error correction cycle taking only $1.1,mu$s, we demonstrate the preservation of four cardinal states of the logical qubit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-07T13:58:44Z) - Connectivity constrains quantum codes [0.06091702876917279]
We study the limitations of quantum LDPC codes associated with local graphs in $D$-dimensional hyperbolic space.
We find that unless the connectivity graph contains an expander, the code is severely limited.
As an application, we present novel bounds on quantum LDPC codes associated with local graphs in $D$-dimensional hyperbolic space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T20:03:16Z) - Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive
error correction [56.362599585843085]
State-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10-3$.
Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits.
We implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T17:11:20Z) - Trade-offs on number and phase shift resilience in bosonic quantum codes [10.66048003460524]
One quantum error correction solution is to encode quantum information into one or more bosonic modes.
We show that by using arbitrarily many modes, $g$-gapped multi-mode codes can yield good approximate quantum error correction codes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-28T10:44:34Z) - Optimal Universal Quantum Error Correction via Bounded Reference Frames [8.572932528739283]
Error correcting codes with a universal set of gates are a desideratum for quantum computing.
We show that our approximate codes are capable of efficiently correcting different types of erasure errors.
Our approach has implications for fault-tolerant quantum computing, reference frame error correction, and the AdS-CFT duality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-17T18:00:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.