FEBR: Expert-Based Recommendation Framework for beneficial and personalized content

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01455v1
• Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:21:31 GMT
• Title: FEBR: Expert-Based Recommendation Framework for beneficial and personalized content
• Authors: Mohamed Lechiakh, Alexandre Maurer
• Abstract summary: We propose FEBR (Expert-Based Recommendation Framework), an apprenticeship learning framework to assess the quality of the recommended content. The framework exploits the demonstrated trajectories of an expert (assumed to be reliable) in a recommendation evaluation environment, to recover an unknown utility function. We evaluate the performance of our solution through a user interest simulation environment (using RecSim)
• Score: 77.86290991564829
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: So far, most research on recommender systems focused on maintaining long-term user engagement and satisfaction, by promoting relevant and personalized content. However, it is still very challenging to evaluate the quality and the reliability of this content. In this paper, we propose FEBR (Expert-Based Recommendation Framework), an apprenticeship learning framework to assess the quality of the recommended content on online platforms. The framework exploits the demonstrated trajectories of an expert (assumed to be reliable) in a recommendation evaluation environment, to recover an unknown utility function. This function is used to learn an optimal policy describing the expert's behavior, which is then used in the framework to provide high-quality and personalized recommendations. We evaluate the performance of our solution through a user interest simulation environment (using RecSim). We simulate interactions under the aforementioned expert policy for videos recommendation, and compare its efficiency with standard recommendation methods. The results show that our approach provides a significant gain in terms of content quality, evaluated by experts and watched by users, while maintaining almost the same watch time as the baseline approaches.

Related papers

• Unveiling User Satisfaction and Creator Productivity Trade-Offs in Recommendation Platforms [68.51708490104687]
  We show that a purely relevance-driven policy with low exploration strength boosts short-term user satisfaction but undermines the long-term richness of the content pool. Our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between immediate user satisfaction and overall content production on platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T07:19:22Z)
• Review-based Recommender Systems: A Survey of Approaches, Challenges and Future Perspectives [11.835903510784735]
  Review-based recommender systems have emerged as a significant sub-field in this domain. We present a categorization of these systems and summarize the state-of-the-art methods, analyzing their unique features, effectiveness, and limitations. We propose potential directions for future research, including the integration of multimodal data, multi-criteria rating information, and ethical considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T05:45:18Z)
• RecRec: Algorithmic Recourse for Recommender Systems [41.97186998947909]
  It is crucial for all stakeholders to understand the model's rationale behind making certain predictions and recommendations. This is especially true for the content providers whose livelihoods depend on the recommender system. We propose a recourse framework for recommender systems, targeted towards the content providers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T22:26:50Z)
• A Survey on Fairness-aware Recommender Systems [59.23208133653637]
  We present concepts of fairness in different recommendation scenarios, comprehensively categorize current advances, and introduce typical methods to promote fairness in different stages of recommender systems. Next, we delve into the significant influence that fairness-aware recommender systems exert on real-world industrial applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T07:08:22Z)
• Two-Stage Neural Contextual Bandits for Personalised News Recommendation [50.3750507789989]
  Existing personalised news recommendation methods focus on exploiting user interests and ignores exploration in recommendation. We build on contextual bandits recommendation strategies which naturally address the exploitation-exploration trade-off. We use deep learning representations for users and news, and generalise the neural upper confidence bound (UCB) policies to generalised additive UCB and bilinear UCB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-26T12:07:56Z)
• Experiments on Generalizability of User-Oriented Fairness in Recommender Systems [2.0932879442844476]
  A fairness-aware recommender system aims to treat different user groups similarly. We propose a user-centered fairness re-ranking framework applied on top of a base ranking model. We evaluate the final recommendations provided by the re-ranking framework from both user- (e.g., NDCG) and item-side (e.g., novelty, item-fairness) metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T12:36:30Z)
• A Review on Pushing the Limits of Baseline Recommendation Systems with the integration of Opinion Mining & Information Retrieval Techniques [0.0]
  Recommendation Systems allow users to identify trending items among a community while being timely and relevant to the user's expectations. Deep Learning methods have been brought forward to achieve better quality recommendations. Researchers have tried to expand on the capabilities of standard recommendation systems to provide the most effective recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T22:13:33Z)
• Towards Content Provider Aware Recommender Systems: A Simulation Study on the Interplay between User and Provider Utilities [34.288256311920904]
  We build a REINFORCE recommender agent, coined EcoAgent, to optimize a joint objective of user utility and the counterfactual utility lift of the provider associated with the recommended content. We offer a number of simulated experiments that shed light on both the benefits and the limitations of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-06T00:02:58Z)
• Generative Inverse Deep Reinforcement Learning for Online Recommendation [62.09946317831129]
  We propose a novel inverse reinforcement learning approach, namely InvRec, for online recommendation. InvRec extracts the reward function from user's behaviors automatically, for online recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T12:12:25Z)
• Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphs [73.81994676695346]
  We analyze different groups of users according to their level of activity, and find that bias exists in recommendation performance between different groups. We show that inactive users may be more susceptible to receiving unsatisfactory recommendations, due to insufficient training data for the inactive users. We propose a fairness constrained approach via re-ranking to mitigate this problem in the context of explainable recommendation over knowledge graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T05:04:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.