Conditional Sequential Slate Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05618v2
• Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 06:31:08 GMT
• Title: Conditional Sequential Slate Optimization
• Authors: Yipeng Zhang, Mingjian Lu, Saratchandra Indrakanti, Manojkumar Rangasamy Kannadasan, Abraham Bagherjeiran
• Abstract summary: A search ranking system typically orders the results by independent query-document scores to produce a slate of search results. We introduce conditional sequential slate optimization (CSSO), which jointly learns to optimize for traditional ranking metrics as well as prescribed distribution criteria of documents within the slate. The proposed method can be applied to practical real world problems such as enforcing diversity in e-commerce search results, mitigating bias in top results and personalization of results.
• Score: 15.10459152219771
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The top search results matching a user query that are displayed on the first page are critical to the effectiveness and perception of a search system. A search ranking system typically orders the results by independent query-document scores to produce a slate of search results. However, such unilateral scoring methods may fail to capture inter-document dependencies that users are sensitive to, thus producing a sub-optimal slate. Further, in practice, many real-world applications such as e-commerce search require enforcing certain distributional criteria at the slate-level, due to business objectives or long term user retention goals. Unilateral scoring of results does not explicitly support optimizing for such objectives with respect to a slate. Hence, solutions to the slate optimization problem must consider the optimal selection and order of the documents, along with adherence to slate-level distributional criteria. To that end, we propose a hybrid framework extended from traditional slate optimization to solve the conditional slate optimization problem. We introduce conditional sequential slate optimization (CSSO), which jointly learns to optimize for traditional ranking metrics as well as prescribed distribution criteria of documents within the slate. The proposed method can be applied to practical real world problems such as enforcing diversity in e-commerce search results, mitigating bias in top results and personalization of results. Experiments on public datasets and real-world data from e-commerce datasets show that CSSO outperforms popular comparable ranking methods in terms of adherence to distributional criteria while producing comparable or better relevance metrics.

Related papers

• An incremental preference elicitation-based approach to learning potentially non-monotonic preferences in multi-criteria sorting [53.36437745983783]
  We first construct a max-margin optimization-based model to model potentially non-monotonic preferences. We devise information amount measurement methods and question selection strategies to pinpoint the most informative alternative in each iteration. Two incremental preference elicitation-based algorithms are developed to learn potentially non-monotonic preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T14:36:20Z)
• Training Greedy Policy for Proposal Batch Selection in Expensive Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization [52.80408805368928]
  We introduce a novel greedy-style subset selection algorithm for batch acquisition. Our experiments on the red fluorescent proteins show that our proposed method achieves the baseline performance in 1.69x fewer queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T05:57:08Z)
• Optimal Baseline Corrections for Off-Policy Contextual Bandits [61.740094604552475]
  We aim to learn decision policies that optimize an unbiased offline estimate of an online reward metric. We propose a single framework built on their equivalence in learning scenarios. Our framework enables us to characterize the variance-optimal unbiased estimator and provide a closed-form solution for it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T12:52:22Z)
• Learning Fair Ranking Policies via Differentiable Optimization of Ordered Weighted Averages [55.04219793298687]
  This paper shows how efficiently-solvable fair ranking models can be integrated into the training loop of Learning to Rank. In particular, this paper is the first to show how to backpropagate through constrained optimizations of OWA objectives, enabling their use in integrated prediction and decision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:53:53Z)
• Adaptive Neural Ranking Framework: Toward Maximized Business Goal for Cascade Ranking Systems [33.46891569350896]
  Cascade ranking is widely used for large-scale top-k selection problems in online advertising and recommendation systems. Previous works on learning-to-rank usually focus on letting the model learn the complete order or top-k order. We name this method as Adaptive Neural Ranking Framework (abbreviated as ARF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:43:02Z)
• Semantic Equivalence of e-Commerce Queries [6.232692545488813]
  This paper introduces a framework to recognize and leverage query equivalence to enhance searcher and business outcomes. The proposed approach addresses three key problems: mapping queries to vector representations of search intent, identifying nearest neighbor queries expressing equivalent or similar intent, and optimizing for user or business objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T18:40:13Z)
• Optimizer's Information Criterion: Dissecting and Correcting Bias in Data-Driven Optimization [16.57676001669012]
  In data-driven optimization, the sample performance of the obtained decision typically incurs an optimistic bias against the true performance. Common techniques to correct this bias, such as cross-validation, require repeatedly solving additional optimization problems and are therefore expensive. We develop a general bias correction approach that directly approximates the first-order bias and does not require solving any additional optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T07:07:58Z)
• BitE : Accelerating Learned Query Optimization in a Mixed-Workload Environment [0.36700088931938835]
  BitE is a novel ensemble learning model using database statistics and metadata to tune a learned query for enhancing performance. Our model achieves 19.6% more improved queries and 15.8% less regressed queries compared to the existing traditional methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T16:05:33Z)
• On Second-order Optimization Methods for Federated Learning [59.787198516188425]
  We evaluate the performance of several second-order distributed methods with local steps in the federated learning setting. We propose a novel variant that uses second-order local information for updates and a global line search to counteract the resulting local specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T12:04:08Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.