Experimental Bayesian estimation of quantum state preparation,
measurement, and gate errors in multi-qubit devices
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.10686v3
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:23:08 GMT
- Title: Experimental Bayesian estimation of quantum state preparation,
measurement, and gate errors in multi-qubit devices
- Authors: Haggai Landa, Dekel Meirom, Naoki Kanazawa, Mattias Fitzpatrick,
Christopher J. Wood
- Abstract summary: We self-consistently estimate up to seven parameters of each qubit's state preparation, readout, and gate errors.
We demonstrate easily implemented approaches for mitigating different errors before a quantum experiment.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We introduce a Bayesian method for the estimation of single qubit errors in
quantum devices, and use it to characterize these errors on three 27-qubit
superconducting qubit devices. We self-consistently estimate up to seven
parameters of each qubit's state preparation, readout, and gate errors, analyze
the stability of these errors as a function of time, and demonstrate easily
implemented approaches for mitigating different errors before a quantum
computation experiment. On the investigated devices we find non-negligible
qubit reset errors that cannot be parametrized as a diagonal mixed state, but
manifest as a coherent phase of a superposition with a small contribution from
the qubit's excited state. We are able to mitigate such errors by applying
pre-rotations on the initialized qubits, which we demonstrate with multi-qubit
entangled states. Our results demonstrate that Bayesian estimation can resolve
small parameters - including those pertaining to quantum gate errors - with a
high relative accuracy, at a lower measurement cost as compared with standard
characterization approaches.
Related papers
- Quasi-Probabilistic Readout Correction of Mid-Circuit Measurements for Adaptive Feedback via Measurement Randomized Compiling [7.804530685405802]
Quantum measurements are a fundamental component of quantum computing.
On modern-day quantum computers, measurements can be more error prone than quantum gates.
We show that measurement errors can be tailored into a simple error model using randomized compiling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T18:57:13Z) - Efficient separate quantification of state preparation errors and
measurement errors on quantum computers and their mitigation [0.5439020425819]
Current noisy quantum computers have multiple types of errors, which can occur in the state preparation, measurement/readout, and gate operation.
We propose a simple and resource-efficient approach to quantify separately the state preparation and readout error rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-29T02:51:06Z) - Fast Flux-Activated Leakage Reduction for Superconducting Quantum
Circuits [84.60542868688235]
leakage out of the computational subspace arising from the multi-level structure of qubit implementations.
We present a resource-efficient universal leakage reduction unit for superconducting qubits using parametric flux modulation.
We demonstrate that using the leakage reduction unit in repeated weight-two stabilizer measurements reduces the total number of detected errors in a scalable fashion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T16:21:32Z) - Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and
Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application.
We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor.
This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z) - Conditionally rigorous mitigation of multiqubit measurement errors [0.0]
measurement errors are significantly larger than gate errors on some platforms.
We develop a measurement error mitigation technique, conditionally rigorous TMEM, that is not sensitive to state-preparation errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-09T17:49:13Z) - Experimental demonstration of continuous quantum error correction [0.0]
We implement a continuous quantum bit-flip correction code in a multi-qubit architecture.
We achieve an average bit-flip detection efficiency of up to 91%.
Our results showcase resource-efficient stabilizer measurements in a multi-qubit architecture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-23T18:00:55Z) - Fault-tolerant parity readout on a shuttling-based trapped-ion quantum
computer [64.47265213752996]
We experimentally demonstrate a fault-tolerant weight-4 parity check measurement scheme.
We achieve a flag-conditioned parity measurement single-shot fidelity of 93.2(2)%.
The scheme is an essential building block in a broad class of stabilizer quantum error correction protocols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-13T20:08:04Z) - Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive
error correction [56.362599585843085]
State-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10-3$.
Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits.
We implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T17:11:20Z) - Crosstalk Suppression for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction with
Trapped Ions [62.997667081978825]
We present a study of crosstalk errors in a quantum-computing architecture based on a single string of ions confined by a radio-frequency trap, and manipulated by individually-addressed laser beams.
This type of errors affects spectator qubits that, ideally, should remain unaltered during the application of single- and two-qubit quantum gates addressed at a different set of active qubits.
We microscopically model crosstalk errors from first principles and present a detailed study showing the importance of using a coherent vs incoherent error modelling and, moreover, discuss strategies to actively suppress this crosstalk at the gate level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-21T14:20:40Z) - Fault-Tolerant Operation of a Quantum Error-Correction Code [1.835073691235972]
Quantum error correction protects fragile quantum information by encoding it into a larger quantum system.
Fault-tolerant circuits contain the spread of errors while operating the logical qubit.
We show that fault-tolerant circuits enable highly accurate logical primitives in current quantum systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-24T04:31:38Z) - Discrimination of Ohmic thermal baths by quantum dephasing probes [68.8204255655161]
We evaluate the minimum error probability achievable by three different kinds of quantum probes, namely a qubit, a qutrit and a quantum register made of two qubits.
A qutrit probe outperforms a qubit one in the discrimination task, whereas a register made of two qubits does not offer any advantage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-06T08:51:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.