I Know You Can't See Me: Dynamic Occlusion-Aware Safety Validation of Strategic Planners for Autonomous Vehicles Using Hypergames

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09807v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:38:14 GMT
• Title: I Know You Can't See Me: Dynamic Occlusion-Aware Safety Validation of Strategic Planners for Autonomous Vehicles Using Hypergames
• Authors: Maximilian Kahn, Atrisha Sarkar and Krzysztof Czarnecki
• Abstract summary: We develop a novel multi-agent dynamic occlusion risk measure for assessing situational risk. We present a white-box, scenario-based, accelerated safety validation framework for assessing safety of strategic planners in AV.
• Score: 12.244501203346566
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A particular challenge for both autonomous and human driving is dealing with risk associated with dynamic occlusion, i.e., occlusion caused by other vehicles in traffic. Based on the theory of hypergames, we develop a novel multi-agent dynamic occlusion risk (DOR) measure for assessing situational risk in dynamic occlusion scenarios. Furthermore, we present a white-box, scenario-based, accelerated safety validation framework for assessing safety of strategic planners in AV. Based on evaluation over a large naturalistic database, our proposed validation method achieves a 4000% speedup compared to direct validation on naturalistic data, a more diverse coverage, and ability to generalize beyond the dataset and generate commonly observed dynamic occlusion crashes in traffic in an automated manner.

Related papers

• Traffic and Safety Rule Compliance of Humans in Diverse Driving Situations [48.924085579865334]
  Analyzing human data is crucial for developing autonomous systems that replicate safe driving practices. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of human compliance with traffic and safety rules across multiple trajectory prediction datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T09:21:00Z)
• A Safe Self-evolution Algorithm for Autonomous Driving Based on Data-Driven Risk Quantification Model [14.398857940603495]
  This paper proposes a safe self-evolution algorithm for autonomous driving based on data-driven risk quantification model. To prevent the impact of over-conservative safety guarding policies on the self-evolution capability of the algorithm, a safety-evolutionary decision-control integration algorithm with adjustable safety limits is proposed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T02:52:35Z)
• Collision Probability Distribution Estimation via Temporal Difference Learning [0.46085106405479537]
  We introduce CollisionPro, a pioneering framework designed to estimate cumulative collision probability distributions. We formulate our framework within the context of reinforcement learning to pave the way for safety-aware agents. A comprehensive examination of our framework is conducted using a realistic autonomous driving simulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T13:32:42Z)
• LaPlaSS: Latent Space Planning for Stochastic Systems [8.529245639496274]
  We propose a "generate-and-test" approach to risk-bounded planning for autonomous mobile agents. We use a variational autoencoder to learn a latent linear dynamics model and encode the planning problem into the latent space to generate the candidate trajectory. We demonstrate that our algorithm, LaPlaSS, is able to generate trajectory plans with bounded risk for a real-world agent with learned dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:52:35Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• RCP-RF: A Comprehensive Road-car-pedestrian Risk Management Framework based on Driving Risk Potential Field [1.625213292350038]
  We propose a comprehensive driving risk management framework named RCP-RF based on potential field theory under Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAV) environment. Different from existing algorithms, the motion tendency between ego and obstacle cars and the pedestrian factor are legitimately considered in the proposed framework. Empirical studies validate the superiority of our proposed framework against state-of-the-art methods on real-world dataset NGSIM and real AV platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T01:54:37Z)
• Unsupervised Self-Driving Attention Prediction via Uncertainty Mining and Knowledge Embedding [51.8579160500354]
  We propose an unsupervised way to predict self-driving attention by uncertainty modeling and driving knowledge integration. Results show equivalent or even more impressive performance compared to fully-supervised state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T00:28:33Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• Risk-Sensitive Sequential Action Control with Multi-Modal Human Trajectory Forecasting for Safe Crowd-Robot Interaction [55.569050872780224]
  We present an online framework for safe crowd-robot interaction based on risk-sensitive optimal control, wherein the risk is modeled by the entropic risk measure. Our modular approach decouples the crowd-robot interaction into learning-based prediction and model-based control. A simulation study and a real-world experiment show that the proposed framework can accomplish safe and efficient navigation while avoiding collisions with more than 50 humans in the scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T02:02:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.