Recommending POIs for Tourists by User Behavior Modeling and Pseudo-Rating

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06523v2
• Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 01:41:04 GMT
• Title: Recommending POIs for Tourists by User Behavior Modeling and Pseudo-Rating
• Authors: Kun Yi, Ryu Yamagishi, Taishan Li, Zhengyang Bai, Qiang Ma
• Abstract summary: Most tourist visit a few sightseeing spots once and most of these spots have no check-in data from new tourists. Most conventional systems rank sightseeing spots based on their popularity, reputations, and category-based similarities with users' preferences. We propose a mechanism to recommend POIs to tourists.
• Score: 3.839157829013354
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: POI recommendation is a key task in tourism information systems. However, in contrast to conventional point of interest (POI) recommender systems, the available data is extremely sparse; most tourist visit a few sightseeing spots once and most of these spots have no check-in data from new tourists. Most conventional systems rank sightseeing spots based on their popularity, reputations, and category-based similarities with users' preferences. They do not clarify what users can experience in these spots, which makes it difficult to meet diverse tourism needs. To this end, in this work, we propose a mechanism to recommend POIs to tourists. Our mechanism include two components: one is a probabilistic model that reveals the user behaviors in tourism; the other is a pseudo rating mechanism to handle the cold-start issue in POIs recommendations. We carried out extensive experiments with two datasets collected from Flickr. The experimental results demonstrate that our methods are superior to the state-of-the-art methods in both the recommendation performances (precision, recall and F-measure) and fairness. The experimental results also validate the robustness of the proposed methods, i.e., our methods can handle well the issue of data sparsity.

Related papers

• Revisiting Reciprocal Recommender Systems: Metrics, Formulation, and Method [60.364834418531366]
  We propose five new evaluation metrics that comprehensively and accurately assess the performance of RRS. We formulate the RRS from a causal perspective, formulating recommendations as bilateral interventions. We introduce a reranking strategy to maximize matching outcomes, as measured by the proposed metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T07:21:02Z)
• Be Aware of the Neighborhood Effect: Modeling Selection Bias under Interference [50.95521705711802]
  Previous studies have focused on addressing selection bias to achieve unbiased learning of the prediction model. This paper formally formulates the neighborhood effect as an interference problem from the perspective of causal inference. We propose a novel ideal loss that can be used to deal with selection bias in the presence of neighborhood effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T15:20:41Z)
• Att-KGCN: Tourist Attractions Recommendation System by using Attention mechanism and Knowledge Graph Convolution Network [6.571146539235987]
  We propose the improved Attention Knowledge Graph Convolution Network model, named ($Att-KGCN$) The attention layer aggregates relatively similar locations and represents them with an adjacent vector. According to the tourist's preferred choices, the model predicts the probability of similar spots as a recommendation system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T14:06:28Z)
• Self-supervised Graph-based Point-of-interest Recommendation [66.58064122520747]
  Next Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation has become a prominent component in location-based e-commerce. We propose a Self-supervised Graph-enhanced POI Recommender (S2GRec) for next POI recommendation. In particular, we devise a novel Graph-enhanced Self-attentive layer to incorporate the collaborative signals from both global transition graph and local trajectory graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T17:29:34Z)
• Simpson's Paradox in Recommender Fairness: Reconciling differences between per-user and aggregated evaluations [16.053419956606557]
  We argue that two notions of fairness in ranking and recommender systems can lead to opposite conclusions. We reconcile these notions and show that the tension is due to differences in distributions of users where items are relevant. Based on this new understanding, practitioners might be interested in either notions, but might face challenges with the per-user metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T12:43:32Z)
• Debiased Recommendation with Neural Stratification [19.841871819722016]
  We propose to cluster the users for computing more accurate IPS via increasing the exposure densities. We conduct extensive experiments based on real-world datasets to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-15T15:45:35Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• Using consumer feedback from location-based services in PoI recommender systems for people with autism [4.4951754159063295]
  We propose a model for the extraction of sensory data from the reviews about Points of Interest (PoIs) We tested our approach with autistic and neurotypical people by integrating it into diverse recommendation algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T08:47:58Z)
• The Unfairness of Active Users and Popularity Bias in Point-of-Interest Recommendation [4.578469978594752]
  This paper studies the interplay between (i) the unfairness of active users, (ii) the unfairness of popular items, and (iii) the accuracy of recommendation as three angles of our study triangle. For item fairness, we divide items into short-head, mid-tail, and long-tail groups and study the exposure of these item groups into the top-k recommendation list of users. Our study shows that most recommendation models cannot satisfy both consumer and producer fairness, indicating a trade-off between these variables possibly due to natural biases in data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T08:02:19Z)
• Deep Causal Reasoning for Recommendations [47.83224399498504]
  A new trend in recommender system research is to negate the influence of confounders from a causal perspective. We model the recommendation as a multi-cause multi-outcome (MCMO) inference problem. We show that MCMO modeling may lead to high variance due to scarce observations associated with the high-dimensional causal space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-06T15:00:01Z)
• Probabilistic and Variational Recommendation Denoising [56.879165033014026]
  Learning from implicit feedback is one of the most common cases in the application of recommender systems. We propose probabilistic and variational recommendation denoising for implicit feedback. We employ the proposed DPI and DVAE on four state-of-the-art recommendation models and conduct experiments on three datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T08:59:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.