Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature,
Scope, and Limitations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10980v1
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:51:28 GMT
- Title: Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Nature,
Scope, and Limitations
- Authors: Jakob Mokander, Jessica Morley, Mariarosaria Taddeo and Luciano
Floridi
- Abstract summary: Delegating tasks to automated decision-making systems (ADMS) can improve efficiency and enable new solutions.
For example, ADMS may produce discriminatory outcomes, violate individual privacy, and undermine human self-determination.
New governance mechanisms are thus needed that help organisations design and deploy ADMS in ways that are ethical.
- Score: 1.2599533416395765
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Important decisions that impact human lives, livelihoods, and the natural
environment are increasingly being automated. Delegating tasks to so-called
automated decision-making systems (ADMS) can improve efficiency and enable new
solutions. However, these benefits are coupled with ethical challenges. For
example, ADMS may produce discriminatory outcomes, violate individual privacy,
and undermine human self-determination. New governance mechanisms are thus
needed that help organisations design and deploy ADMS in ways that are ethical,
while enabling society to reap the full economic and social benefits of
automation. In this article, we consider the feasibility and efficacy of
ethics-based auditing (EBA) as a governance mechanism that allows organisations
to validate claims made about their ADMS. Building on previous work, we define
EBA as a structured process whereby an entity's present or past behaviour is
assessed for consistency with relevant principles or norms. We then offer three
contributions to the existing literature. First, we provide a theoretical
explanation of how EBA can contribute to good governance by promoting
procedural regularity and transparency. Second, we propose seven criteria for
how to design and implement EBA procedures successfully. Third, we identify and
discuss the conceptual, technical, social, economic, organisational, and
institutional constraints associated with EBA. We conclude that EBA should be
considered an integral component of multifaced approaches to managing the
ethical risks posed by ADMS.
Related papers
- Ethical and Scalable Automation: A Governance and Compliance Framework for Business Applications [0.0]
This paper introduces a framework ensuring that AI must be ethical, controllable, viable, and desirable.
Different case studies validate this framework by integrating AI in both academic and practical environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-25T12:39:28Z) - Operationalising AI governance through ethics-based auditing: An industry case study [0.0]
Ethics based auditing (EBA) is a structured process whereby an entitys past or present behaviour is assessed for consistency with moral principles or norms.
This article provides a detailed description of the organisational context in which EBA procedures must be integrated to be feasible and effective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T12:22:38Z) - The Foundations of Computational Management: A Systematic Approach to
Task Automation for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence into Existing
Workflows [55.2480439325792]
This article introduces Computational Management, a systematic approach to task automation.
The article offers three easy step-by-step procedures to begin the process of implementing AI within a workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T01:45:14Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Causal Fairness for Outcome Control [68.12191782657437]
We study a specific decision-making task called outcome control in which an automated system aims to optimize an outcome variable $Y$ while being fair and equitable.
In this paper, we first analyze through causal lenses the notion of benefit, which captures how much a specific individual would benefit from a positive decision.
We then note that the benefit itself may be influenced by the protected attribute, and propose causal tools which can be used to analyze this.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T09:31:18Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Ethics-Based Auditing of Automated Decision-Making Systems: Intervention
Points and Policy Implications [0.0]
This article outlines the conditions under which ethics-based auditing (EBA) procedures can be feasible and effective in practice.
We frame ADMS as parts of larger socio-technical systems to demonstrate that to be feasible and effective, EBA procedures must link to intervention points.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-08T10:57:26Z) - Ethics-Based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AI [0.0]
We argue that ethics-based auditing can improve the quality of decision making, increase user satisfaction, unlock growth potential, enable law-making, and relieve human suffering.
To be feasible and effective, ethics-based auditing should take the form of a continuous and constructive process, approach ethical alignment from a system perspective, and be aligned with public policies and incentives for ethically desirable behaviour.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-30T11:39:40Z) - Enhanced well-being assessment as basis for the practical implementation
of ethical and rights-based normative principles for AI [0.0]
We propose the practical application of an enhanced well-being impact assessment framework for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems.
This process could enable a human-centered algorithmically-supported approach to the understanding of the impacts of AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T13:26:05Z) - Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules.
This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z) - Learning from Learning Machines: Optimisation, Rules, and Social Norms [91.3755431537592]
It appears that the area of AI that is most analogous to the behaviour of economic entities is that of morally good decision-making.
Recent successes of deep learning for AI suggest that more implicit specifications work better than explicit ones for solving such problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-29T17:42:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.