A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in
High-Fidelity Simulation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00964v1
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 03:41:33 GMT
- Title: A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in
High-Fidelity Simulation
- Authors: Ziyuan Zhong, Yun Tang, Yuan Zhou, Vania de Oliveira Neves, Yang Liu,
Baishakhi Ray
- Abstract summary: Testing the system on the road is the closest to real-world and desirable approach, but it is incredibly costly.
A popular alternative is to evaluate an ADS's performance in some well-designed challenging scenarios, a.k.a. scenario-based testing.
High-fidelity simulators have been widely used in this setting to maximize flexibility and convenience in testing what-if scenarios.
- Score: 26.10081199009559
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) have seen rapid progress in recent years. To
ensure the safety and reliability of these systems, extensive testings are
being conducted before their future mass deployment. Testing the system on the
road is the closest to real-world and desirable approach, but it is incredibly
costly. Also, it is infeasible to cover rare corner cases using such real-world
testing. Thus, a popular alternative is to evaluate an ADS's performance in
some well-designed challenging scenarios, a.k.a. scenario-based testing.
High-fidelity simulators have been widely used in this setting to maximize
flexibility and convenience in testing what-if scenarios. Although many works
have been proposed offering diverse frameworks/methods for testing specific
systems, the comparisons and connections among these works are still missing.
To bridge this gap, in this work, we provide a generic formulation of
scenario-based testing in high-fidelity simulation and conduct a literature
review on the existing works. We further compare them and present the open
challenges as well as potential future research directions.
Related papers
- XLD: A Cross-Lane Dataset for Benchmarking Novel Driving View Synthesis [84.23233209017192]
This paper presents a novel driving view synthesis dataset and benchmark specifically designed for autonomous driving simulations.
The dataset is unique as it includes testing images captured by deviating from the training trajectory by 1-4 meters.
We establish the first realistic benchmark for evaluating existing NVS approaches under front-only and multi-camera settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T14:00:21Z) - Automated System-level Testing of Unmanned Aerial Systems [2.2249176072603634]
A major requirement of international safety standards is to perform rigorous system-level testing of avionics software systems.
The proposed approach (AITester) utilizes model-based testing and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automatically generate, execute, and evaluate various test scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-23T14:47:26Z) - Simulative Performance Analysis of an AD Function with Road Network
Variation [0.0]
We propose a method to automatically test a set of scenarios in many variations.
Those variations are not applied to traffic participants around the ADF, but to the road network to show that parameters regarding the road topology also influence the performance of such an ADF.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-01T15:25:51Z) - On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptation [82.8392232222119]
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising approach for tackling the robustness challenge under distribution shifts.
We present TTAB, a test-time adaptation benchmark that encompasses ten state-of-the-art algorithms, a diverse array of distribution shifts, and two evaluation protocols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T09:35:29Z) - An Application of Scenario Exploration to Find New Scenarios for the
Development and Testing of Automated Driving Systems in Urban Scenarios [2.480533141352916]
This work aims to find relevant, interesting, or critical parameter sets within logical scenarios by utilizing Bayes optimization and Gaussian processes.
A list of ideas this work leads to and should be investigated further is presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-17T09:47:32Z) - Complete Agent-driven Model-based System Testing for Autonomous Systems [0.0]
A novel approach to testing complex autonomous transportation systems is described.
It is intended to mitigate some of the most critical problems regarding verification and validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-25T01:55:24Z) - Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous
Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator.
We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project.
We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z) - Testing the Safety of Self-driving Vehicles by Simulating Perception and
Prediction [88.0416857308144]
We propose an alternative to sensor simulation, as sensor simulation is expensive and has large domain gaps.
We directly simulate the outputs of the self-driving vehicle's perception and prediction system, enabling realistic motion planning testing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-13T17:20:02Z) - Towards Automated Safety Coverage and Testing for Autonomous Vehicles
with Reinforcement Learning [0.3683202928838613]
Validation puts the autonomous vehicle system to the test in scenarios or situations that the system would likely encounter in everyday driving.
We propose using reinforcement learning (RL) to generate failure examples and unexpected traffic situations for the AV software implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-22T19:00:38Z) - From Simulation to Real World Maneuver Execution using Deep
Reinforcement Learning [69.23334811890919]
Deep Reinforcement Learning has proved to be able to solve many control tasks in different fields, but the behavior of these systems is not always as expected when deployed in real-world scenarios.
This is mainly due to the lack of domain adaptation between simulated and real-world data together with the absence of distinction between train and test datasets.
We present a system based on multiple environments in which agents are trained simultaneously, evaluating the behavior of the model in different scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T14:22:20Z) - Dynamic Causal Effects Evaluation in A/B Testing with a Reinforcement
Learning Framework [68.96770035057716]
A/B testing is a business strategy to compare a new product with an old one in pharmaceutical, technological, and traditional industries.
This paper introduces a reinforcement learning framework for carrying A/B testing in online experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-05T10:25:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.