Technical Language Supervision for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis in Process Industry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.07356v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 18:59:40 GMT
• Title: Technical Language Supervision for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis in Process Industry
• Authors: Karl L\"owenmark, Cees Taal, Stephan Schnabel, Marcus Liwicki, and Fredrik Sandin
• Abstract summary: In the process industry, condition monitoring systems with automated fault diagnosis methods assisthuman experts and thereby improve maintenance efficiency, process sustainability, and workplace safety. A major challenge in intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD) is to develop realistic datasets withaccurate labels needed to train and validate models. domain-specific knowledge about fault characteristics and severitiesexists as technical language annotations in industrial datasets. This creates a timely opportunity to developtechnical language supervision(TLS) solutions for IFD systems grounded in industrial data.
• Score: 1.8574771508622119
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the process industry, condition monitoring systems with automated fault diagnosis methods assisthuman experts and thereby improve maintenance efficiency, process sustainability, and workplace safety.Improving the automated fault diagnosis methods using data and machine learning-based models is a centralaspect of intelligent fault diagnosis (IFD). A major challenge in IFD is to develop realistic datasets withaccurate labels needed to train and validate models, and to transfer models trained with labeled lab datato heterogeneous process industry environments. However, fault descriptions and work-orders written bydomain experts are increasingly digitized in modern condition monitoring systems, for example in the contextof rotating equipment monitoring. Thus, domain-specific knowledge about fault characteristics and severitiesexists as technical language annotations in industrial datasets. Furthermore, recent advances in naturallanguage processing enable weakly supervised model optimization using natural language annotations, mostnotably in the form ofnatural language supervision(NLS). This creates a timely opportunity to developtechnical language supervision(TLS) solutions for IFD systems grounded in industrial data, for exampleas a complement to pre-training with lab data to address problems like overfitting and inaccurate out-of-sample generalisation. We surveyed the literature and identify a considerable improvement in the maturityof NLS over the last two years, facilitating applications beyond natural language; a rapid development ofweak supervision methods; and transfer learning as a current trend in IFD which can benefit from thesedevelopments. Finally, we describe a framework for integration of TLS in IFD which is inspired by recentNLS innovations.

Related papers

• Consultation on Industrial Machine Faults with Large language Models [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel approach leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve fault diagnosis accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach outperforms baseline models, achieving an accuracy of 91%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T08:22:16Z)
• SRTFD: Scalable Real-Time Fault Diagnosis through Online Continual Learning [8.016378373626084]
  Modern industrial environments demand FD methods that can handle new fault types, dynamic conditions, large-scale data, and provide real-time responses with minimal prior information. We propose SRTFD, a scalable real-time fault diagnosis framework that enhances online continual learning (OCL) with three critical methods. Experiments on a real-world dataset and two public simulated datasets demonstrate SRTFD's effectiveness and potential for providing advanced, scalable, and precise fault diagnosis in modern industrial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-11T03:26:22Z)
• Learn while Unlearn: An Iterative Unlearning Framework for Generative Language Models [49.043599241803825]
  Iterative Contrastive Unlearning (ICU) framework consists of three core components. A Knowledge Unlearning Induction module removes specific knowledge through an unlearning loss. A Contrastive Learning Enhancement module to preserve the model's expressive capabilities against the pure unlearning goal. And an Iterative Unlearning Refinement module that dynamically assess the unlearning extent on specific data pieces and make iterative update.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T07:09:35Z)
• Continuous Test-time Domain Adaptation for Efficient Fault Detection under Evolving Operating Conditions [10.627285023764086]
  We propose a Test-time domain Adaptation Anomaly Detection (TAAD) framework that separates input variables into system parameters and measurements. Our approach, tested on a real-world pump monitoring dataset, shows significant improvements over existing domain adaptation methods in fault detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T15:53:14Z)
• The Frontier of Data Erasure: Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [56.26002631481726]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are foundational to AI advancements. LLMs pose risks by potentially memorizing and disseminating sensitive, biased, or copyrighted information. Machine unlearning emerges as a cutting-edge solution to mitigate these concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T09:26:15Z)
• Causal Disentanglement Hidden Markov Model for Fault Diagnosis [55.90917958154425]
  We propose a Causal Disentanglement Hidden Markov model (CDHM) to learn the causality in the bearing fault mechanism. Specifically, we make full use of the time-series data and progressively disentangle the vibration signal into fault-relevant and fault-irrelevant factors. To expand the scope of the application, we adopt unsupervised domain adaptation to transfer the learned disentangled representations to other working environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T05:58:45Z)
• Safe AI for health and beyond -- Monitoring to transform a health service [51.8524501805308]
  We will assess the infrastructure required to monitor the outputs of a machine learning algorithm. We will present two scenarios with examples of monitoring and updates of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:27:45Z)
• Fault Diagnosis using eXplainable AI: a Transfer Learning-based Approach for Rotating Machinery exploiting Augmented Synthetic Data [0.0]
  FaultD-XAI is a generic and interpretable approach for classifying faults in rotating machinery based on transfer learning. To provide scalability using transfer learning, synthetic vibration signals are created mimicking the characteristic behavior of failures in operation. The proposed approach not only obtained promising diagnostic performance, but was also able to learn characteristics used by experts to identify conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T15:02:35Z)
• An Ontology for Defect Detection in Metal Additive Manufacturing [3.997680012976965]
  Key for Industry 4.0 applications is to develop control systems capable of addressing data integration and semantic interoperability issues. We provide the classification of process-induced defects known from the metal additive manufacturing literature. Our knowledge base aims at enhancing the capabilities of additive manufacturing by adding further defect analysis terminology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T13:35:25Z)
• Anomaly Detection Based on Selection and Weighting in Latent Space [73.01328671569759]
  We propose a novel selection-and-weighting-based anomaly detection framework called SWAD. Experiments on both benchmark and real-world datasets have shown the effectiveness and superiority of SWAD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T10:56:38Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.