Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.08760v3
• Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 12:26:57 GMT
• Title: Constrained multi-objective optimization of process design parameters in settings with scarce data: an application to adhesive bonding
• Authors: Alejandro Morales-Hern\'andez, Sebastian Rojas Gonzalez, Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse, Ivo Couckuyt, Jeroen Jordens, Maarten Witters, and Bart Van Doninck
• Abstract summary: Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques to emulate the objective and constraint functions.
• Score: 48.7576911714538
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Adhesive joints are increasingly used in industry for a wide variety of applications because of their favorable characteristics such as high strength-to-weight ratio, design flexibility, limited stress concentrations, planar force transfer, good damage tolerance, and fatigue resistance. Finding the optimal process parameters for an adhesive bonding process is challenging: the optimization is inherently multi-objective (aiming to maximize break strength while minimizing cost), constrained (the process should not result in any visual damage to the materials, and stress tests should not result in failures that are adhesion-related), and uncertain (testing the same process parameters several times may lead to different break strengths). Real-life physical experiments in the lab are expensive to perform. Traditional evolutionary approaches (such as genetic algorithms) are then ill-suited to solve the problem, due to the prohibitive amount of experiments required for evaluation. Although Bayesian optimization-based algorithms are preferred to solve such expensive problems, few methods consider the optimization of more than one (noisy) objective and several constraints at the same time. In this research, we successfully applied specific machine learning techniques (Gaussian Process Regression) to emulate the objective and constraint functions based on a limited amount of experimental data. The techniques are embedded in a Bayesian optimization algorithm, which succeeds in detecting Pareto-optimal process settings in a highly efficient way (i.e., requiring a limited number of physical experiments).

Related papers

• Optimization-Driven Adaptive Experimentation [7.948144726705323]
  Real-world experiments involve batched & delayed feedback, non-stationarity, multiple objectives & constraints, and (often some) personalization. Tailoring adaptive methods to address these challenges on a per-problem basis is infeasible, and static designs remain the de facto standard. We present a mathematical programming formulation that can flexibly incorporate a wide range of objectives, constraints, and statistical procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:29:09Z)
• End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
  The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality. This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives. It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z)
• Task-specific experimental design for treatment effect estimation [59.879567967089145]
  Large randomised trials (RCTs) are the standard for causal inference. Recent work has proposed more sample-efficient alternatives to RCTs, but these are not adaptable to the downstream application for which the causal effect is sought. We develop a task-specific approach to experimental design and derive sampling strategies customised to particular downstream applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T18:10:37Z)
• An Empirical Evaluation of Zeroth-Order Optimization Methods on AI-driven Molecule Optimization [78.36413169647408]
  We study the effectiveness of various ZO optimization methods for optimizing molecular objectives. We show the advantages of ZO sign-based gradient descent (ZO-signGD) We demonstrate the potential effectiveness of ZO optimization methods on widely used benchmark tasks from the Guacamol suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T01:58:10Z)
• Efficiently Controlling Multiple Risks with Pareto Testing [34.83506056862348]
  We propose a two-stage process which combines multi-objective optimization with multiple hypothesis testing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach to reliably accelerate the execution of large-scale Transformer models in natural language processing (NLP) applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:54:39Z)
• Bayesian optimization with known experimental and design constraints for chemistry applications [0.0]
  We extend our experiment planning algorithms Phoenics and Gryffin such that they can handle arbitrary known constraints. We illustrate their practical utility in two simulated chemical research scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T22:16:54Z)
• Tuning Particle Accelerators with Safety Constraints using Bayesian Optimization [73.94660141019764]
  tuning machine parameters of particle accelerators is a repetitive and time-consuming task. We propose and evaluate a step size-limited variant of safe Bayesian optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-26T02:21:03Z)
• Golem: An algorithm for robust experiment and process optimization [0.0]
  Design of experiment and optimization algorithms are often adopted to solve these tasks efficiently. Golem is an algorithm that is suboptimal to the choice of experiment planning strategy. It can be used to analyze the robustness of past experiments, or to guide experiment planning toward robust solutions on the fly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T15:00:34Z)
• High Dimensional Level Set Estimation with Bayesian Neural Network [58.684954492439424]
  This paper proposes novel methods to solve the high dimensional Level Set Estimation problems using Bayesian Neural Networks. For each problem, we derive the corresponding theoretic information based acquisition function to sample the data points. Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets show that our proposed method can achieve better results compared to existing state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-17T23:21:53Z)
• Experimental adaptive Bayesian estimation of multiple phases with limited data [0.0]
  adaptive protocols, exploiting additional control parameters, provide a tool to optimize the performance of a quantum sensor to work in such limited data regime. Finding the optimal strategies to tune the control parameters during the estimation process is a non-trivial problem, and machine learning techniques are a natural solution to address such task. We employ a compact and flexible integrated photonic circuit, fabricated by femtosecond laser writing, which allows to implement different strategies with high degree of control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-04T11:32:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.