Attention-based Bidirectional LSTM for Deceptive Opinion Spam Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.14789v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:02:04 GMT
• Title: Attention-based Bidirectional LSTM for Deceptive Opinion Spam Classification
• Authors: Ashish Salunkhe
• Abstract summary: Fraudulent reviews are deliberately posted on various online review platforms to trick customers to buy, visit or distract against a product or a restaurant. The work aims at detecting and classifying the reviews as deceptive or truthful. It involves use of various deep learning techniques for classifying the reviews and an overview of proposed approach.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Online Reviews play a vital role in e commerce for decision making. Much of the population makes the decision of which places, restaurant to visit, what to buy and from where to buy based on the reviews posted on the respective platforms. A fraudulent review or opinion spam is categorized as an untruthful or deceptive review. Positive reviews of a product or a restaurant helps attract customers and thereby lead to an increase in sales whereas negative reviews may hamper the progress of a restaurant or sales of a product and thereby lead to defamed reputation and loss. Fraudulent reviews are deliberately posted on various online review platforms to trick customers to buy, visit or distract against a product or a restaurant. They are also written to commend or discredit the product's repute. The work aims at detecting and classifying the reviews as deceptive or truthful. It involves use of various deep learning techniques for classifying the reviews and an overview of proposed approach involving Attention based Bidirectional LSTM to tackle issues related to semantic information in reviews and a comparative study over baseline machine learning techniques for review classification.

Related papers

• What Matters in Explanations: Towards Explainable Fake Review Detection Focusing on Transformers [45.55363754551388]
  Customers' reviews and feedback play crucial role on e-commerce platforms like Amazon, Zalando, and eBay. There is a prevailing concern that sellers often post fake or spam reviews to deceive potential customers and manipulate their opinions about a product. We propose an explainable framework for detecting fake reviews with high precision in identifying fraudulent content with explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T13:26:02Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
  In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback. The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied. We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z)
• Unmasking Falsehoods in Reviews: An Exploration of NLP Techniques [0.0]
  This research paper proposes a machine learning model to identify deceptive reviews. To accomplish this, an n-gram model and max features are developed to effectively identify deceptive content. The experimental results reveal that the passive aggressive classifier stands out among the various algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T06:35:43Z)
• On the Role of Reviewer Expertise in Temporal Review Helpfulness Prediction [5.381004207943597]
  Existing methods for identifying helpful reviews primarily focus on review text and ignore the two key factors of (1) who post the reviews and (2) when the reviews are posted. We introduce a dataset and develop a model that integrates the reviewer's expertise, derived from the past review history, and the temporal dynamics of the reviews to automatically assess review helpfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T23:41:22Z)
• Combat AI With AI: Counteract Machine-Generated Fake Restaurant Reviews on Social Media [77.34726150561087]
  We propose to leverage the high-quality elite Yelp reviews to generate fake reviews from the OpenAI GPT review creator. We apply the model to predict non-elite reviews and identify the patterns across several dimensions. We show that social media platforms are continuously challenged by machine-generated fake reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T19:40:10Z)
• Detecting Spam Reviews on Vietnamese E-commerce Websites [0.0]
  We propose the dataset called ViSpamReviews, which has a strict annotation procedure for detecting spam reviews on e-commerce platforms. Our dataset consists of two tasks: the binary classification task for detecting whether a review is a spam or not and the multi-class classification task for identifying the type of spam. The PhoBERT obtained the highest results on both tasks, 88.93% and 72.17%, respectively, by macro average F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-27T10:37:14Z)
• Reviews in motion: a large scale, longitudinal study of review recommendations on Yelp [24.34131115451651]
  We focus on "reclassification," wherein a platform changes its filtering decision for a review. We compile over 12.5M reviews--more than 2M unique--across over 10k businesses. Our data suggests demographic disparities in reclassifications, with more changes in lower density and low-middle income areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T03:27:53Z)
• Abstractive Opinion Tagging [65.47649273721679]
  In e-commerce, opinion tags refer to a ranked list of tags provided by the e-commerce platform that reflect characteristics of reviews of an item. Current mechanisms for generating opinion tags rely on either manual or labelling methods, which is time-consuming and ineffective. We propose an abstractive opinion tagging framework, named AOT-Net, to generate a ranked list of opinion tags given a large number of reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T05:08:15Z)
• SentiLSTM: A Deep Learning Approach for Sentiment Analysis of Restaurant Reviews [13.018530502810128]
  This paper proposes, a deep learning-based technique (i.e., BiLSTM) to classify the reviews provided by the clients of the restaurant into positive and negative polarities. The results of the evaluation on test dataset show that BiLSTM technique produced in the highest accuracy of 91.35%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-19T06:24:42Z)
• A Unified Dual-view Model for Review Summarization and Sentiment Classification with Inconsistency Loss [51.448615489097236]
  Acquiring accurate summarization and sentiment from user reviews is an essential component of modern e-commerce platforms. We propose a novel dual-view model that jointly improves the performance of these two tasks. Experiment results on four real-world datasets from different domains demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T13:34:11Z)
• An Iterative Approach for Identifying Complaint Based Tweets in Social Media Platforms [76.9570531352697]
  We propose an iterative methodology which aims to identify complaint based posts pertaining to the transport domain. We perform comprehensive evaluations along with releasing a novel dataset for the research purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-24T22:23:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.