Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass:
Economic Conflict and Social Affinity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13656v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:49:19 GMT
- Title: Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass:
Economic Conflict and Social Affinity
- Authors: Ernesto Colacrai, Federico Cinus, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales,
Michele Starnini
- Abstract summary: We analyze social interactions on Reddit under the lens of a multi-dimensional ideological framework: the political compass.
By leveraging their self-declarations, we disentangle the ideological dimensions of users into economic (left-right) and social (libertarian richness-authoritarian) axes.
We find significant homophily for interactions along the social axis of the political compass and demographic attributes.
In contrast, we uncover a significant heterophily along the economic axis: left/right interactions exceed expectations by 10%.
- Score: 3.850666668546735
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The prevalent perspective in quantitative research on opinion dynamics
flattens the landscape of the online political discourse into a traditional
left--right dichotomy. While this approach helps simplify the analysis and
modeling effort, it also neglects the intrinsic multidimensional richness of
ideologies. In this study, we analyze social interactions on Reddit, under the
lens of a multi-dimensional ideological framework: the political compass. We
examine over 8 million comments posted on the subreddits /r/PoliticalCompass
and /r/PoliticalCompassMemes during 2020--2022. By leveraging their
self-declarations, we disentangle the ideological dimensions of users into
economic (left--right) and social (libertarian--authoritarian) axes. In
addition, we characterize users by their demographic attributes (age, gender,
and affluence).
We find significant homophily for interactions along the social axis of the
political compass and demographic attributes. Compared to a null model,
interactions among individuals of similar ideology surpass expectations by 6%.
In contrast, we uncover a significant heterophily along the economic axis:
left/right interactions exceed expectations by 10%. Furthermore, heterophilic
interactions are characterized by a higher language toxicity than homophilic
interactions, which hints at a conflictual discourse between every opposite
ideology. Our results help reconcile apparent contradictions in recent
literature, which found a superposition of homophilic and heterophilic
interactions in online political discussions. By disentangling such
interactions into the economic and social axes we pave the way for a deeper
understanding of opinion dynamics on social media.
Related papers
- Moral consensus and divergence in partisan language use [0.0]
Polarization has increased substantially in political discourse, contributing to a widening partisan divide.
We analyzed large-scale, real-world language use in Reddit communities and in news outlets to uncover psychological dimensions along which partisan language is divided.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T16:50:26Z) - Social media polarization reflects shifting political alliances in
Pakistan [44.99833362998488]
Spanning from 2018 to 2022, our analysis of Twitter data allows us to capture pivotal shifts and developments in Pakistan's political arena.
By examining interactions and content generated by politicians affiliated with major political parties, we reveal a consistent and active presence of politicians on Twitter.
Our analysis also uncovers significant shifts in political affiliations, including the transition of politicians to the opposition alliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T00:07:48Z) - Upvotes? Downvotes? No Votes? Understanding the relationship between
reaction mechanisms and political discourse on Reddit [0.6767885381740952]
This study investigates the relationship between social media reaction mechanisms and political rhetoric in user discussions.
We analyze 155 million user comments in 55 political subforums on Reddit between 2010 and 2018.
We find that political discourse theories describe political discussions on Reddit to a large extent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-19T11:12:45Z) - Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News
Discussion on Reddit [9.875731068651561]
We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context.
We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-15T11:37:12Z) - Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers
and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years.
We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z) - Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization
and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market.
We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized.
Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z) - Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics
on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity.
The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - Political Ideology and Polarization of Policy Positions: A
Multi-dimensional Approach [19.435030285532854]
We study the ideology of the policy under discussion teasing apart the nuanced co-existence of stance and ideology.
Aligned with the theoretical accounts in political science, we treat ideology as a multi-dimensional construct.
We showcase that this framework enables quantitative analysis of polarization, a temporal, multifaceted measure of ideological distance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-28T04:03:04Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.