Algorithmic cooling for resolving state preparation and measurement errors in quantum computing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08114v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:41:58 GMT
• Title: Algorithmic cooling for resolving state preparation and measurement errors in quantum computing
• Authors: Raymond Laflamme, Junan Lin, Tal Mor
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel type of algorithmic cooling protocol called measurement-based algorithmic cooling (MBAC) MBAC assumes the ability to perform (potentially imperfect) projective measurements on individual qubits. We demonstrate that MBAC can significantly reduce state preparation error under realistic assumptions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: State preparation and measurement errors are commonly regarded as indistinguishable. The problem of distinguishing state preparation (SPAM) errors from measurement errors is important to the field of characterizing quantum processors. In this work, we propose a method to separately characterize SPAM errors using a novel type of algorithmic cooling protocol called measurement-based algorithmic cooling (MBAC). MBAC assumes the ability to perform (potentially imperfect) projective measurements on individual qubits, which is available on many modern quantum processors. We demonstrate that MBAC can significantly reduce state preparation error under realistic assumptions, with a small overhead that can be upper bounded by measurable quantities. Thus, MBAC can be a valuable tool not only for benchmarking near-term quantum processors, but also for improving the performance of quantum processors in an algorithmic manner.

Related papers

• Bayesian mitigation of measurement errors in multi-qubit experiments [0.0]
  We introduce an implementation of Bayesian measurement error mitigation tailored for multiqubit experiments on near-term quantum devices. Our approach leverages complete information from the readout signal, which is available before any binary state assignment of the qubits. We benchmark our protocol on actual quantum computers with superconducting qubits, where the readout signal encodes the measurement information in the IQ clouds before qubit state assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T18:41:49Z)
• Efficient separate quantification of state preparation errors and measurement errors on quantum computers and their mitigation [0.5439020425819]
  Current noisy quantum computers have multiple types of errors, which can occur in the state preparation, measurement/readout, and gate operation. We propose a simple and resource-efficient approach to quantify separately the state preparation and readout error rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T02:51:06Z)
• Single Qubit State Estimation on NISQ Devices with Limited Resources and SIC-POVMs [0.0]
  We consider the problem of estimating the quantum state of a qubit in a quantum processing unit without conducting direct measurements of it. We implement and test the circuit using the quantum computer of the Technical Research Centre of Finland as well as an IBM quantum computer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T09:27:52Z)
• Robust and efficient verification of graph states in blind measurement-based quantum computation [52.70359447203418]
  Blind quantum computation (BQC) is a secure quantum computation method that protects the privacy of clients. It is crucial to verify whether the resource graph states are accurately prepared in the adversarial scenario. Here, we propose a robust and efficient protocol for verifying arbitrary graph states with any prime local dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T06:24:45Z)
• Potential and limitations of quantum extreme learning machines [55.41644538483948]
  We present a framework to model QRCs and QELMs, showing that they can be concisely described via single effective measurements. Our analysis paves the way to a more thorough understanding of the capabilities and limitations of both QELMs and QRCs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T09:32:28Z)
• Measurement based estimator scheme for continuous quantum error correction [52.77024349608834]
  Canonical discrete quantum error correction (DQEC) schemes use projective von Neumann measurements on stabilizers to discretize the error syndromes into a finite set. Quantum error correction (QEC) based on continuous measurement, known as continuous quantum error correction (CQEC), can be executed faster than DQEC and can also be resource efficient. We show that by constructing a measurement-based estimator (MBE) of the logical qubit to be protected, it is possible to accurately track the errors occurring on the physical qubits in real time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T09:07:18Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Circuit Symmetry Verification Mitigates Quantum-Domain Impairments [69.33243249411113]
  We propose circuit-oriented symmetry verification that are capable of verifying the commutativity of quantum circuits without the knowledge of the quantum state. In particular, we propose the Fourier-temporal stabilizer (STS) technique, which generalizes the conventional quantum-domain formalism to circuit-oriented stabilizers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-27T21:15:35Z)
• Conditionally rigorous mitigation of multiqubit measurement errors [0.0]
  measurement errors are significantly larger than gate errors on some platforms. We develop a measurement error mitigation technique, conditionally rigorous TMEM, that is not sensitive to state-preparation errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T17:49:13Z)
• Randomized compiling for scalable quantum computing on a noisy superconducting quantum processor [0.0]
  Coherent errors limit the performance of quantum algorithms in an unpredictable manner. Average error rates measured by randomized benchmarking and related protocols are not sensitive to the full impact of coherent errors. Our results demonstrate that randomized compiling can be utilized to leverage and predict the capabilities of modern-day noisy quantum processors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T06:52:45Z)
• Scalable quantum processor noise characterization [57.57666052437813]
  We present a scalable way to construct approximate MFMs for many-qubit devices based on cumulant expansion. Our method can also be used to characterize various types of correlation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T17:39:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.