Rethinking Collaborative Metric Learning: Toward an Efficient Alternative without Negative Sampling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11549v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 08:50:22 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Collaborative Metric Learning: Toward an Efficient Alternative without Negative Sampling
• Authors: Shilong Bao, Qianqian Xu, Zhiyong Yang, Xiaochun Cao, Qingming Huang
• Abstract summary: Collaborative Metric Learning (CML) paradigm has aroused wide interest in the area of recommendation systems (RS) We find that negative sampling would lead to a biased estimation of the generalization error. Motivated by this, we propose an efficient alternative without negative sampling for CML named textitSampling-Free Collaborative Metric Learning (SFCML)
• Score: 156.7248383178991
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The recently proposed Collaborative Metric Learning (CML) paradigm has aroused wide interest in the area of recommendation systems (RS) owing to its simplicity and effectiveness. Typically, the existing literature of CML depends largely on the \textit{negative sampling} strategy to alleviate the time-consuming burden of pairwise computation. However, in this work, by taking a theoretical analysis, we find that negative sampling would lead to a biased estimation of the generalization error. Specifically, we show that the sampling-based CML would introduce a bias term in the generalization bound, which is quantified by the per-user \textit{Total Variance} (TV) between the distribution induced by negative sampling and the ground truth distribution. This suggests that optimizing the sampling-based CML loss function does not ensure a small generalization error even with sufficiently large training data. Moreover, we show that the bias term will vanish without the negative sampling strategy. Motivated by this, we propose an efficient alternative without negative sampling for CML named \textit{Sampling-Free Collaborative Metric Learning} (SFCML), to get rid of the sampling bias in a practical sense. Finally, comprehensive experiments over seven benchmark datasets speak to the superiority of the proposed algorithm.

Related papers

• AMRFact: Enhancing Summarization Factuality Evaluation with AMR-Driven Negative Samples Generation [57.8363998797433]
  We propose AMRFact, a framework that generates perturbed summaries using Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) Our approach parses factually consistent summaries into AMR graphs and injects controlled factual inconsistencies to create negative examples, allowing for coherent factually inconsistent summaries to be generated with high error-type coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T02:56:29Z)
• Efficient distributed representations beyond negative sampling [4.5687771576879594]
  This article describes an efficient method to learn distributed representations, also known as embeddings. We show that the sotfmax normalization constants can be estimated in linear time, allowing us to design an efficient optimization strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T15:48:26Z)
• Test-Time Distribution Normalization for Contrastively Learned Vision-language Models [39.66329310098645]
  One of the most representative approaches proposed recently known as CLIP has garnered widespread adoption due to its effectiveness. This paper reveals that the common downstream practice of taking a dot product is only a zeroth-order approximation of the optimization goal, resulting in a loss of information during test-time. We propose Distribution Normalization (DN), where we approximate the mean representation of a batch of test samples and use such a mean to represent what would be analogous to negative samples in the InfoNCE loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T01:14:30Z)
• Asymptotically Unbiased Instance-wise Regularized Partial AUC Optimization: Theory and Algorithm [101.44676036551537]
  One-way Partial AUC (OPAUC) and Two-way Partial AUC (TPAUC) measures the average performance of a binary classifier. Most of the existing methods could only optimize PAUC approximately, leading to inevitable biases that are not controllable. We present a simpler reformulation of the PAUC problem via distributional robust optimization AUC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-08T08:26:22Z)
• Hard Negative Sampling via Regularized Optimal Transport for Contrastive Representation Learning [13.474603286270836]
  We study the problem of designing hard negative sampling distributions for unsupervised contrastive representation learning. We propose and analyze a novel min-max framework that seeks a representation which minimizes the maximum (worst-case) generalized contrastive learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-04T21:25:24Z)
• Nonuniform Negative Sampling and Log Odds Correction with Rare Events Data [15.696653979226113]
  We investigate the issue of parameter estimation with nonuniform negative sampling for imbalanced data. We derive a general inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimator and obtain the optimal sampling probability that minimizes its variance. Both theoretical and empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-25T15:37:22Z)
• Unrolling Particles: Unsupervised Learning of Sampling Distributions [102.72972137287728]
  Particle filtering is used to compute good nonlinear estimates of complex systems. We show in simulations that the resulting particle filter yields good estimates in a wide range of scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-06T16:58:34Z)
• Rethinking InfoNCE: How Many Negative Samples Do You Need? [54.146208195806636]
  We study how many negative samples are optimal for InfoNCE in different scenarios via a semi-quantitative theoretical framework. We estimate the optimal negative sampling ratio using the $K$ value that maximizes the training effectiveness function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T08:38:29Z)
• Simplify and Robustify Negative Sampling for Implicit Collaborative Filtering [42.832851785261894]
  In this paper, we first provide a novel understanding of negative instances by empirically observing that only a few instances are potentially important for model learning. We then tackle the untouched false negative problem by favouring high-variance samples stored in memory. Empirical results on two synthetic datasets and three real-world datasets demonstrate both robustness and superiorities of our negative sampling method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-07T19:08:26Z)
• Understanding Negative Sampling in Graph Representation Learning [87.35038268508414]
  We show that negative sampling is as important as positive sampling in determining the optimization objective and the resulted variance. We propose Metropolis-Hastings (MCNS) to approximate the positive distribution with self-contrast approximation and accelerate negative sampling by Metropolis-Hastings. We evaluate our method on 5 datasets that cover extensive downstream graph learning tasks, including link prediction, node classification and personalized recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T06:25:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.