Variational Temporal Deconfounder for Individualized Treatment Effect Estimation from Longitudinal Observational Data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2207.11251v1
• Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 16:43:12 GMT
• Title: Variational Temporal Deconfounder for Individualized Treatment Effect Estimation from Longitudinal Observational Data
• Authors: Zheng Feng, Mattia Prosperi, Jiang Bian
• Abstract summary: Existing approaches for estimating treatment effects from longitudinal observational data are usually built upon a strong assumption of "unconfoundedness" We propose the Variational Temporal Deconfounder (VTD), an approach that leverages deep variational embeddings in the longitudinal setting using proxies. We test our VTD method on both synthetic and real-world clinical data, and the results show that our approach is effective when hidden confounding is the leading bias compared to other existing models.
• Score: 8.347630187110004
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Estimating treatment effects, especially individualized treatment effects (ITE), using observational data is challenging due to the complex situations of confounding bias. Existing approaches for estimating treatment effects from longitudinal observational data are usually built upon a strong assumption of "unconfoundedness", which is hard to fulfill in real-world practice. In this paper, we propose the Variational Temporal Deconfounder (VTD), an approach that leverages deep variational embeddings in the longitudinal setting using proxies (i.e., surrogate variables that serve for unobservable variables). Specifically, VTD leverages observed proxies to learn a hidden embedding that reflects the true hidden confounders in the observational data. As such, our VTD method does not rely on the "unconfoundedness" assumption. We test our VTD method on both synthetic and real-world clinical data, and the results show that our approach is effective when hidden confounding is the leading bias compared to other existing models.

Related papers

• Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curves under Unobserved Confounders from Observational Data [6.166869525631879]
  We present ContiVAE, a novel framework for estimating causal effects of continuous treatments, measured by individual dose-response curves. We show that ContiVAE outperforms existing methods by up to 62%, demonstrating its robustness and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:24:26Z)
• Causal Effect Estimation using identifiable Variational AutoEncoder with Latent Confounders and Post-Treatment Variables [18.34462010115951]
  Estimating causal effects from observational data is challenging, especially in the presence of latent confounders. We propose a novel method of joint Variational AutoEncoder (VAE) and identifiable Variational AutoEncoder (iVAE) for learning the representations of latent confounders and latent post-treatment variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T22:13:25Z)
• Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
  Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts. We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z)
• BITES: Balanced Individual Treatment Effect for Survival data [0.0]
  Estimating the effects of interventions on patient outcome is one of the key aspects of personalized medicine. Time-to-event data is rarely used for treatment optimization. We suggest an approach named BITES, which combines a treatment-specific semi-parametric Cox loss with a treatment-balanced deep neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T10:39:31Z)
• Assessment of Treatment Effect Estimators for Heavy-Tailed Data [70.72363097550483]
  A central obstacle in the objective assessment of treatment effect (TE) estimators in randomized control trials (RCTs) is the lack of ground truth (or validation set) to test their performance. We provide a novel cross-validation-like methodology to address this challenge. We evaluate our methodology across 709 RCTs implemented in the Amazon supply chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T17:53:01Z)
• Deconfounding Temporal Autoencoder: Estimating Treatment Effects over Time Using Noisy Proxies [15.733136147164032]
  Estimating individualized treatment effects (ITEs) from observational data is crucial for decision-making. We develop the Deconfounding Temporal Autoencoder, a novel method that leverages observed noisy proxies to learn a hidden embedding. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our DTA by improving over state-of-the-art benchmarks by a substantial margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T13:14:31Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• DeepRite: Deep Recurrent Inverse TreatmEnt Weighting for Adjusting Time-varying Confounding in Modern Longitudinal Observational Data [68.29870617697532]
  We propose Deep Recurrent Inverse TreatmEnt weighting (DeepRite) for time-varying confounding in longitudinal data. DeepRite is shown to recover the ground truth from synthetic data, and estimate unbiased treatment effects from real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T15:05:08Z)
• Estimating Individual Treatment Effects with Time-Varying Confounders [9.784193264717098]
  Estimating individual treatment effect (ITE) from observational data is meaningful and practical in healthcare. Existing work mainly relies on the strong ignorability assumption that no hidden confounders exist. We propose Deep Sequential Weighting (DSW) for estimating ITE with time-varying confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-27T02:21:56Z)
• Provably Efficient Causal Reinforcement Learning with Confounded Observational Data [135.64775986546505]
  We study how to incorporate the dataset (observational data) collected offline, which is often abundantly available in practice, to improve the sample efficiency in the online setting. We propose the deconfounded optimistic value iteration (DOVI) algorithm, which incorporates the confounded observational data in a provably efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T14:49:33Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.