Credal Valuation Networks for Machine Reasoning Under Uncertainty

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02443v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 04:33:16 GMT
• Title: Credal Valuation Networks for Machine Reasoning Under Uncertainty
• Abstract summary: The paper develops a valuation network as a graphical system for higher-level fusion and reasoning under uncertainty. A practical implementation of the credal valuation network is discussed and its utility demonstrated on a small scale example.
• Score: 0.6307485015636124
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Contemporary undertakings provide limitless opportunities for widespread application of machine reasoning and artificial intelligence in situations characterised by uncertainty, hostility and sheer volume of data. The paper develops a valuation network as a graphical system for higher-level fusion and reasoning under uncertainty in support of the human operators. Valuations, which are mathematical representation of (uncertain) knowledge and collected data, are expressed as credal sets, defined as coherent interval probabilities in the framework of imprecise probability theory. The basic operations with such credal sets, combination and marginalisation, are defined to satisfy the axioms of a valuation algebra. A practical implementation of the credal valuation network is discussed and its utility demonstrated on a small scale example.

Related papers

• Beyond Benchmark Islands: Toward Representative Trustworthiness Evaluation for Agentic AI [45.21562889170875]
  We propose a systematic evaluation paradigm that characterizes agent trustworthiness over a scenario manifold.<n>The framework integrates four complementary components: static cognitive and policy analysis, (ii) interactive sandbox simulation, (iii) social-ethical alignment assessment, and (iv) a distribution-aware representative sampling engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T08:51:33Z)
• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [68.62012304574012]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their reliability, fairness and potential for misuse.<n>We propose an evaluation framework to assess model reliability by analyzing responses to global and local perturbations in the embedding space.<n>Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and tracing the provenance of embedded biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• The Certainty Ratio $C_ρ$: a novel metric for assessing the reliability of classifier predictions [0.0]
  This paper introduces the Certainty Ratio ($C_rho$), a novel metric designed to quantify the contribution of confident (certain) versus uncertain predictions to any classification performance measure. Experimental results across 26 datasets and multiple classifiers, including Decision Trees, Naive-Bayes, 3-Nearest Neighbors, and Random Forests, demonstrate that $C_rho$rho reveals critical insights that conventional metrics often overlook.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T10:50:03Z)
• Quantifying calibration error in modern neural networks through evidence based theory [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework for quantifying the trustworthiness of neural networks by incorporating subjective logic into the evaluation of Expected Error (ECE) We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets where post-calibration results indicate improved trustworthiness. The proposed framework offers a more interpretable and nuanced assessment of AI models, with potential applications in sensitive domains such as healthcare and autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T23:54:21Z)
• When Can You Trust Your Explanations? A Robustness Analysis on Feature Importances [42.36530107262305]
  robustness of explanations plays a central role in ensuring trust in both the system and the provided explanation. We propose a novel approach to analyse the robustness of neural network explanations to non-adversarial perturbations. We additionally present an ensemble method to aggregate various explanations, showing how merging explanations can be beneficial for both understanding the model's decision and evaluating the robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:17:57Z)
• Explainability through uncertainty: Trustworthy decision-making with neural networks [1.104960878651584]
  Uncertainty is a key feature of any machine learning model. It is particularly important in neural networks, which tend to be overconfident. Uncertainty as XAI improves the model's trustworthiness in downstream decision-making tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T10:22:48Z)
• Gaussian Mixture Models for Affordance Learning using Bayesian Networks [50.18477618198277]
  Affordances are fundamental descriptors of relationships between actions, objects and effects. This paper approaches the problem of an embodied agent exploring the world and learning these affordances autonomously from its sensory experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T22:05:45Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Evaluating Explainability in Machine Learning Predictions through Explainer-Agnostic Metrics [0.0]
  We develop six distinct model-agnostic metrics designed to quantify the extent to which model predictions can be explained. These metrics measure different aspects of model explainability, ranging from local importance, global importance, and surrogate predictions. We demonstrate the practical utility of these metrics on classification and regression tasks, and integrate these metrics into an existing Python package for public use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T15:28:36Z)
• Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory Prediction [50.79827516897913]
  We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts. We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Uncertainty Surrogates for Deep Learning [17.868995105624023]
  We introduce a novel way of estimating prediction uncertainty in deep networks through the use of uncertainty surrogates. These surrogates are features of the penultimate layer of a deep network that are forced to match predefined patterns. We show how our approach can be used for estimating uncertainty in prediction and out-of-distribution detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T14:50:28Z)
• Approaching Neural Network Uncertainty Realism [53.308409014122816]
  Quantifying or at least upper-bounding uncertainties is vital for safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. We evaluate uncertainty realism -- a strict quality criterion -- with a Mahalanobis distance-based statistical test. We adopt it to the automotive domain and show that it significantly improves uncertainty realism compared to a plain encoder-decoder model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-08T11:56:12Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.