Disentangling Causal Effects from Sets of Interventions in the Presence of Unobserved Confounders

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05446v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 13:42:36 GMT
• Title: Disentangling Causal Effects from Sets of Interventions in the Presence of Unobserved Confounders
• Authors: Olivier Jeunen, Ciar\'an M. Gilligan-Lee, Rishabh Mehrotra, Mounia Lalmas
• Abstract summary: We aim to learn the effect of a single-intervention from both observational data and sets of interventions. We provide an algorithm that learns the causal model parameters by pooling data from different regimes. The effectiveness of our method is empirically demonstrated on both synthetic and real-world data.
• Score: 19.32843499761667
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The ability to answer causal questions is crucial in many domains, as causal inference allows one to understand the impact of interventions. In many applications, only a single intervention is possible at a given time. However, in some important areas, multiple interventions are concurrently applied. Disentangling the effects of single interventions from jointly applied interventions is a challenging task -- especially as simultaneously applied interventions can interact. This problem is made harder still by unobserved confounders, which influence both treatments and outcome. We address this challenge by aiming to learn the effect of a single-intervention from both observational data and sets of interventions. We prove that this is not generally possible, but provide identification proofs demonstrating that it can be achieved under non-linear continuous structural causal models with additive, multivariate Gaussian noise -- even when unobserved confounders are present. Importantly, we show how to incorporate observed covariates and learn heterogeneous treatment effects. Based on the identifiability proofs, we provide an algorithm that learns the causal model parameters by pooling data from different regimes and jointly maximizing the combined likelihood. The effectiveness of our method is empirically demonstrated on both synthetic and real-world data.

Related papers

• Higher-Order Causal Message Passing for Experimentation with Complex Interference [6.092214762701847]
  We introduce a new class of estimators based on causal message-passing, specifically designed for settings with pervasive, unknown interference. Our estimator draws on information from the sample mean and variance of unit outcomes and treatments over time, enabling efficient use of observed data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T18:00:51Z)
• Integrating Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference: A Novel Approach in Online Experiments [5.488412825534217]
  We introduce an active learning approach: Active Learning in Causal Inference with Interference (ACI) ACI uses Gaussian process to flexibly model the direct and spillover treatment effects as a function of a continuous measure of neighbors' treatment assignment. We demonstrate its feasibility in achieving accurate effects estimations with reduced data requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T04:13:59Z)
• The Blessings of Multiple Treatments and Outcomes in Treatment Effect Estimation [53.81860494566915]
  Existing studies leveraged proxy variables or multiple treatments to adjust for confounding bias. In many real-world scenarios, there is greater interest in studying the effects on multiple outcomes. We show that parallel studies of multiple outcomes involved in this setting can assist each other in causal identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:33:48Z)
• Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions [63.1354734978244]
  We study causal representation learning, the task of inferring latent causal variables and their causal relations from mixtures of the variables. Our goal is to identify both the ground truth latents and their causal graph up to a set of ambiguities which we show to be irresolvable from interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T10:51:58Z)
• Learning Individual Treatment Effects under Heterogeneous Interference in Networks [34.16062968227468]
  Estimates of individual treatment effects from networked observational data are attracting increasing attention. One major challenge in network scenarios is the violation of the stable unit treatment value assumption. We propose a novel Dual Weighting Regression (DWR) algorithm by simultaneously learning attention weights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T15:00:05Z)
• Valid Inference After Causal Discovery [73.87055989355737]
  We develop tools for valid post-causal-discovery inference. We show that a naive combination of causal discovery and subsequent inference algorithms leads to highly inflated miscoverage rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T17:40:45Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Learning Neural Causal Models with Active Interventions [83.44636110899742]
  We introduce an active intervention-targeting mechanism which enables a quick identification of the underlying causal structure of the data-generating process. Our method significantly reduces the required number of interactions compared with random intervention targeting. We demonstrate superior performance on multiple benchmarks from simulated to real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T13:10:37Z)
• Efficient Causal Inference from Combined Observational and Interventional Data through Causal Reductions [68.6505592770171]
  Unobserved confounding is one of the main challenges when estimating causal effects. We propose a novel causal reduction method that replaces an arbitrary number of possibly high-dimensional latent confounders. We propose a learning algorithm to estimate the parameterized reduced model jointly from observational and interventional data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-08T14:29:07Z)
• Learning Joint Nonlinear Effects from Single-variable Interventions in the Presence of Hidden Confounders [9.196779204457059]
  We propose an approach to estimate the effect of multiple simultaneous interventions in the presence of hidden confounders. We prove identifiability under the assumption that the data is generated from a nonlinear continuous structural causal model. We also conduct comprehensive experiments to verify the identifiability result as well as to compare the performance of our approach against a baseline on both synthetic and real-world data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-23T12:52:09Z)
• Causal Inference under Networked Interference and Intervention Policy Enhancement [35.149125599812706]
  Estimating individual treatment effects from data of randomized experiments is a critical task in causal inference. Usually, in randomized experiments or observational studies with interconnected units, one can only observe treatment responses under interference. We study causal effect estimation under general network interference using GNNs, which are powerful tools for capturing the dependency in the graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-20T00:35:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.