Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10595v1
• Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 06:01:08 GMT
• Title: Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Causal Inference based ATM Fraud Detection
• Authors: Yelleti Vivek, Vadlamani Ravi, Abhay Anand Mane, Laveti Ramesh Naidu
• Abstract summary: ATM fraudulent transaction is a common problem faced by banks. In this study, we handled these techniques on an ATM transactions dataset collected from India. We incorporated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and causal inference (CI) in the fraud detection framework.
• Score: 3.4543720783285052
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Gaining the trust of customers and providing them empathy are very critical in the financial domain. Frequent occurrence of fraudulent activities affects these two factors. Hence, financial organizations and banks must take utmost care to mitigate them. Among them, ATM fraudulent transaction is a common problem faced by banks. There following are the critical challenges involved in fraud datasets: the dataset is highly imbalanced, the fraud pattern is changing, etc. Owing to the rarity of fraudulent activities, Fraud detection can be formulated as either a binary classification problem or One class classification (OCC). In this study, we handled these techniques on an ATM transactions dataset collected from India. In binary classification, we investigated the effectiveness of various over-sampling techniques, such as the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), to achieve oversampling. Further, we employed various machine learning techniques viz., Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), Multi-layer perceptron (MLP). GBT outperformed the rest of the models by achieving 0.963 AUC, and DT stands second with 0.958 AUC. DT is the winner if the complexity and interpretability aspects are considered. Among all the oversampling approaches, SMOTE and its variants were observed to perform better. In OCC, IForest attained 0.959 CR, and OCSVM secured second place with 0.947 CR. Further, we incorporated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and causal inference (CI) in the fraud detection framework and studied it through various analyses.

Related papers

• Heterogeneous Graph Auto-Encoder for CreditCard Fraud Detection [0.7864304771129751]
  This paper proposes a novel approach for credit card fraud detection using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with attention mechanisms applied to heterogeneous graph representations of financial data. The proposed model outperforms benchmark algorithms such as Graph Sage and FI-GRL, achieving a superior AUC-PR of 0.89 and an F1-score of 0.81.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:05:27Z)
• An Innovative Attention-based Ensemble System for Credit Card Fraud Detection [5.486205584465161]
  We present a unique attention-based ensemble model for detecting credit card fraud. The ensemble model attains an accuracy of 99.95% with an area under the curve (AUC) of 1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T09:56:23Z)
• Advancing Anomaly Detection: Non-Semantic Financial Data Encoding with LLMs [49.57641083688934]
  We introduce a novel approach to anomaly detection in financial data using Large Language Models (LLMs) embeddings. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs contribute valuable information to anomaly detection as our models outperform the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T20:19:09Z)
• Securing Transactions: A Hybrid Dependable Ensemble Machine Learning Model using IHT-LR and Grid Search [2.4374097382908477]
  We introduce a state-of-the-art hybrid ensemble (ENS) Machine learning (ML) model that intelligently combines multiple algorithms to enhance fraud identification. Our experiments are conducted on a publicly available credit card dataset comprising 284,807 transactions. The proposed model achieves impressive accuracy rates of 99.66%, 99.73%, 98.56%, and 99.79%, and a perfect 100% for the DT, RF, KNN, and ENS models, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T09:01:42Z)
• Explainable Fraud Detection with Deep Symbolic Classification [4.1205832766381985]
  We present Deep Classification, an extension of the Deep Symbolic Regression framework to classification problems. Because the functions are mathematical expressions that are in closed-form and concise, the model is inherently explainable both at the level of a single classification decision and the model's decision process. An evaluation on the PaySim data set demonstrates competitive predictive performance with state-of-the-art models, while surpassing them in terms of explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T13:50:55Z)
• Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
  We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection. A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes. Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z)
• Enhancing Multiple Reliability Measures via Nuisance-extended Information Bottleneck [77.37409441129995]
  In practical scenarios where training data is limited, many predictive signals in the data can be rather from some biases in data acquisition. We consider an adversarial threat model under a mutual information constraint to cover a wider class of perturbations in training. We propose an autoencoder-based training to implement the objective, as well as practical encoder designs to facilitate the proposed hybrid discriminative-generative training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T16:03:21Z)
• ATM Fraud Detection using Streaming Data Analytics [3.4543720783285052]
  In the study, we proposed ATM fraud detection in static and streaming contexts respectively. In both contexts, RF turned out to be the best model. RF is also empirically proven to be statistically significant than the next-best performing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T23:40:18Z)
• Transfer Attacks Revisited: A Large-Scale Empirical Study in Real Computer Vision Settings [64.37621685052571]
  We conduct the first systematic empirical study of transfer attacks against major cloud-based ML platforms. The study leads to a number of interesting findings which are inconsistent to the existing ones. We believe this work sheds light on the vulnerabilities of popular ML platforms and points to a few promising research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-07T12:16:24Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)
• COVI-AgentSim: an Agent-based Model for Evaluating Methods of Digital Contact Tracing [68.68882022019272]
  COVI-AgentSim is an agent-based compartmental simulator based on virology, disease progression, social contact networks, and mobility patterns. We use COVI-AgentSim to perform cost-adjusted analyses comparing no DCT to: 1) standard binary contact tracing (BCT) that assigns binary recommendations based on binary test results; and 2) a rule-based method for feature-based contact tracing (FCT) that assigns a graded level of recommendation based on diverse individual features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T00:47:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.