No-local-broadcasting theorem for non-signalling behaviours and assemblages
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14351v2
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 20:45:54 GMT
- Title: No-local-broadcasting theorem for non-signalling behaviours and assemblages
- Authors: Adrian Solymos, Carlos Vieira, Cristhiano Duarte, Zoltán Zimborás,
- Abstract summary: The no-broadcasting theorem is a fundamental result in quantum information theory.<n>We prove Joshi, Grudka, and Horodecki$otimes 4$ conjectured that one cannot locally broadcast nonlocal behaviours.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The no-broadcasting theorem is a fundamental result in quantum information theory. It guarantees that a class of attacks on quantum protocols, based on eavesdropping and indiscriminate copying of quantum information, are impossible. Due to its fundamental importance, it is natural to ask whether it is an intrinsic quantum property or whether it also holds for a broader class of non-classical theories. To address this question, one could use the framework of correlation scenarios. Under this standpoint, Joshi, Grudka, and Horodecki$^{\otimes 4}$ conjectured that one cannot locally broadcast nonlocal behaviours. In this paper, we prove their conjecture based on the monotonicity of the relative entropy for behaviours. Additionally, following a similar reasoning, we obtain an analogous no-go theorem for steerable assemblages.
Related papers
- Bell Nonlocality as a Covariance Obstruction in Locally Covariant Quantum Field Theory [0.0]
We show that Bell-type correlations persist in entangled field states across spacelike regions.<n>We formalize this as a no-go theorem in the category-theoretic framework of LCQFT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-21T05:27:22Z) - Parity erasure: a foundational principle for indefinite causal order [3.044633305006356]
We identify an information-theoretic principle, termed parity erasure, that characterizes such processes.<n>Our characterization does not rely on the formalism of quantum theory itself, but instead is derived from a set of axioms for general operational probabilistic theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T14:21:04Z) - Universal quantum computation using Ising anyons from a non-semisimple Topological Quantum Field Theory [0.058331173224054456]
We propose a framework for topological quantum computation using newly discovered non-semisimple analogs of topological quantum field theories in 2+1 dimensions.
We show that the non-semisimple theory introduces new anyon types that extend the Ising framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T21:03:07Z) - Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
We introduce a class of probabilistic theories, where system dynamics are constrained to the minimal set of operations.<n>Specifically, the allowed instruments are limited to those derived from compositions of preparations, measurements, swap transformations, and conditional tests.<n>We demonstrate that minimal theories with conditioning and a spanning set of non-separable states satisfy two quantum no-go theorems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z) - New Prospects for a Causally Local Formulation of Quantum Theory [0.0]
This paper introduces a new principle of causal locality intended to improve on Bell's criteria.
It shows that systems that remain at spacelike separation cannot exert causal influences on each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T18:19:51Z) - A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality.
Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z) - A simple formulation of no-cloning and no-hiding that admits efficient
and robust verification [0.0]
Incompatibility is a feature of quantum theory that sets it apart from classical theory.
The no-hiding theorem is another such instance that arises in the context of the black-hole information paradox.
We formulate both of these fundamental features of quantum theory in a single form that is amenable to efficient verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-05T12:48:11Z) - Dispensing of quantum information beyond no-broadcasting theorem -- is
it possible to broadcast anything genuinely quantum? [0.0]
We generalize the standard definition of broadcasting by restricting the set of states which we want to broadcast.
We show that in all of the investigated cases broadcasting is equivalent to commutativity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-19T07:54:59Z) - The hidden quantum origin of gauge connections [0.0]
I employ a standard fibre bundle approach to introduce gauge theories.
I will try to justify the assessment that if we are to allow for gauge fields and parallel transport, we may have to allow at least some level of quantumness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T07:39:36Z) - Incompatibility of observables, channels and instruments in information
theories [68.8204255655161]
We study the notion of compatibility for tests of an operational probabilistic theory.
We show that a theory admits of incompatible tests if and only if some information cannot be extracted without disturbance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-17T08:44:29Z) - Testing quantum theory by generalizing noncontextuality [0.0]
We prove that only Jordan-algebraic state spaces are exactly embeddable into quantum theory.
We propose an experimental test of quantum theory by probing single physical systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-17T19:00:24Z) - Bell nonlocality in networks [62.997667081978825]
Bell's theorem proves that quantum theory is inconsistent with local physical models.
In the last decade, the investigation of nonlocality has moved beyond Bell's theorem to consider more sophisticated experiments.
This review discusses the main concepts, methods, results and future challenges in the emerging topic of Bell nonlocality in networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-21T18:00:48Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Secure Two-Party Quantum Computation Over Classical Channels [63.97763079214294]
We consider the setting where the two parties (a classical Alice and a quantum Bob) can communicate only via a classical channel.
We show that it is in general impossible to realize a two-party quantum functionality with black-box simulation in the case of malicious quantum adversaries.
We provide a compiler that takes as input a classical proof of quantum knowledge (PoQK) protocol for a QMA relation R and outputs a zero-knowledge PoQK for R that can be verified by classical parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T17:55:31Z) - From a quantum theory to a classical one [117.44028458220427]
We present and discuss a formal approach for describing the quantum to classical crossover.
The method was originally introduced by L. Yaffe in 1982 for tackling large-$N$ quantum field theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T09:16:38Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.