A contextually objective approach to the extended Wigner's friend thought experiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03016v1
• Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 10:58:02 GMT
• Title: A contextually objective approach to the extended Wigner's friend thought experiment
• Authors: Maxime Federico and Philippe Grangier
• Abstract summary: We show that no contradiction arises if one admits that agents must agree on what is considered as a system and what is not. In such a contextually objective approach of quantum mechanics, the apparent contradiction is automatically removed.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a discussion of the extended Wigner's friend thought experiment proposed by Frauchiger and Renner in [1]. We show by using various arguments, including textbook quantum mechanics and the ontological approach of Contexts, Systems, Modalities (CSM), that no contradiction arises if one admits that agents must agree on what is considered as a system and what is not. In such a contextually objective approach of quantum mechanics, the apparent contradiction is automatically removed. We also discuss why this mutual agreement between agents is already implicit in the standard formulations of quantum mechanics, and why removing it leads to inconsistencies.

Related papers

• What Does '(Non)-Absoluteness of Observed Events' Mean? [0.0]
  We argue that the Wigner's friend paradox, the theorem of Bong et al and the theorem of Lawrence et al are all best understood as demonstrating that if quantum mechanics is universal. We also argue that these theorems taken together suggest interesting possibilities for a different kind of relational approach in which dynamical states are relativized whilst observed events are absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T17:13:31Z)
• The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach [0.0]
  I argue that quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:19:04Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• A Measure-Theoretic Axiomatisation of Causality [55.6970314129444]
  We argue in favour of taking Kolmogorov's measure-theoretic axiomatisation of probability as the starting point towards an axiomatisation of causality. Our proposed framework is rigorously grounded in measure theory, but it also sheds light on long-standing limitations of existing frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T13:15:48Z)
• The Relational Dissolution of the Quantum Measurement Problems [0.0]
  The Quantum Measurement Problem is arguably one of the most debated issues in the philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. It represents not only a technical difficulty for the standard formulation of the theory, but also a source of interpretational disputes concerning the meaning of the quantum postulates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T19:33:59Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• The quantum mechanics needs the principle of wave function collapse, but this principle should not be misunderstood [0.0]
  The postulate of the collapse of the wave function stands between the microscopic, quantum world, and the macroscopic world. It is also proved here that the idea of collapse at a distance is problematic especially in relativistic cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T16:07:15Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Self-adjointness in Quantum Mechanics: a pedagogical path [77.34726150561087]
  This paper aims to make quantum observables emerge as necessarily self-adjoint, and not merely hermitian operators. Next to the central core of our line of reasoning, the necessity of a non-trivial declaration of a domain to associate with the formal action of an observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-28T21:19:33Z)
• Agents governed by quantum mechanics can use it intersubjectively and consistently [0.0]
  We propose a simple operational principle called superpositional solipsism to aid rational agents in making situational inferences. We show that the principle leads to sound inferences in all operationally-relevant instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T19:04:59Z)
• Einselection from incompatible decoherence channels [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze an open quantum dynamics inspired by CQED experiments with two non-commuting Lindblad operators. We show that Fock states remain the most robust states to decoherence up to a critical coupling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-29T14:15:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.