The quantum mechanics needs the principle of wave function collapse, but
this principle should not be misunderstood
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10000v1
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:07:15 GMT
- Title: The quantum mechanics needs the principle of wave function collapse, but
this principle should not be misunderstood
- Authors: Sofia D. Wechsler
- Abstract summary: The postulate of the collapse of the wave function stands between the microscopic, quantum world, and the macroscopic world.
It is also proved here that the idea of collapse at a distance is problematic especially in relativistic cases.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The postulate of the collapse of the wave function stands between the
microscopic, quantum world, and the macroscopic world. Because of this
intermediate position, the collapse process cannot be examined with the
formalism of the quantum mechanics (QM), neither with that of classical
mechanics. This fact makes some physicists to propose interpretations of QM,
which avoid this postulate. However, the common procedure used in that, is
making assumptions incompatible with the QM formalism. The present work
discusses the most popular interpretations. It is shown that because of such
assumptions those interpretations fail, i.e. predict for some experiments
results which differ from the QM predictions. Despite of that, special
attention is called to a proposal of S. Gao, the only one which addresses and
tries to solve an obvious and major contradiction. A couple of theorems are
proved for showing that the collapse postulate is necessary in the QM. Although
nonexplainable with the quantum formalism this postulate cannot be denied,
otherwise one comes to conclusions which disagree with the QM. It is also
proved here that the idea of collapse at a distance is problematic especially
in relativistic cases, and is a misunderstanding. Namely, in an entanglement of
two quantum systems, assuming that the measurement of one of the systems
(accompanied by collapse of that system on one of its states) collapses the
other system too without the second system being measured, leads to a
contradiction.
Related papers
- Testing trajectory-based determinism via time probability distributions [44.99833362998488]
Bohmian mechanics (BM) has inherited more predictive power than quantum mechanics (QM)
We introduce a prescription for constructing a flight-time probability distribution within generic trajectory-equipped theories.
We derive probability distributions that are unreachable by QM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T11:36:38Z) - Response to "The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are not redundant" [0.0]
We prove that each of these theories contains pure states which are not rays of the Hilbert space.
We also prove that these alternatives violate the finite-dimensionality of mixed states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-04T15:03:50Z) - Measurement incompatibility is strictly stronger than disturbance [44.99833362998488]
Heisenberg argued that measurements irreversibly alter the state of the system on which they are acting, causing an irreducible disturbance on subsequent measurements.
This article shows that measurement incompatibility is indeed a sufficient condition for irreversibility of measurement disturbance.
However, we exhibit a toy theory, termed the minimal classical theory (MCT), that is a counterexample for the converse implication.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T13:47:00Z) - Quantum Instability [30.674987397533997]
We show how a time-independent, finite-dimensional quantum system can give rise to a linear instability corresponding to that in the classical system.
An unstable quantum system has a richer spectrum and a much longer recurrence time than a stable quantum system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-05T19:53:46Z) - Events in quantum mechanics are maximally non-absolute [0.9176056742068814]
We prove that quantum correlations can be maximally non-absolute according to both quantifiers.
We show that chained Bell inequalities (and relaxations thereof) are also valid constraints for Wigner's experiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-19T21:15:16Z) - Qubits are not observers -- a no-go theorem [0.0]
The relational approach to quantum states asserts that the physical description of quantum systems is always relative to something or someone.
We show, in the form of a no-go theorem, that in RQM the physical description of a system relative to an observer cannot represent knowledge about the observer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T22:48:16Z) - A realistic model for completing Quantum Mechanics [0.0]
In Copenhagen the physical objects and the experimental results can be described only in a macroscopic language.
The measurement problem is at the center of these difficulties, mainly because it requires the introduction of the reduction process of the wave function.
We build up and propose a model which is able to solve the measurement problem and all the other difficulties which, in a way or in another, are related to it.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-26T16:41:41Z) - Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world.
We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z) - Impossibility of creating a superposition of unknown quantum states [16.467540842571328]
We show that the existence of a protocol that superposes two unknown pure states with nonzero probability leads to violation of other no-go theorems.
Such a protocol can be used to perform certain state discrimination and cloning tasks that are forbidden in quantum theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T13:25:42Z) - Measuring Quantum Superpositions (Or, "It is only the theory which
decides what can be observed.") [0.0]
We argue that the ad hoc introduction of the projection postulate (or measurement rule) can be understood as a necessary requirement coming from a naive empiricist standpoint.
We discuss the general physical conditions for measuring and observing quantum superpositions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-02T14:30:56Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.