Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03566v2
• Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 22:48:49 GMT
• Title: Simple Binary Hypothesis Testing under Local Differential Privacy and Communication Constraints
• Authors: Ankit Pensia, Amir R. Asadi, Varun Jog, Po-Ling Loh
• Abstract summary: We study simple binary hypothesis testing under both local differential privacy (LDP) and communication constraints. We qualify our results as either minimax optimal or instance optimal.
• Score: 8.261182037130407
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study simple binary hypothesis testing under both local differential privacy (LDP) and communication constraints. We qualify our results as either minimax optimal or instance optimal: the former hold for the set of distribution pairs with prescribed Hellinger divergence and total variation distance, whereas the latter hold for specific distribution pairs. For the sample complexity of simple hypothesis testing under pure LDP constraints, we establish instance-optimal bounds for distributions with binary support; minimax-optimal bounds for general distributions; and (approximately) instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms for general distributions. When both privacy and communication constraints are present, we develop instance-optimal, computationally efficient algorithms that achieve the minimum possible sample complexity (up to universal constants). Our results on instance-optimal algorithms hinge on identifying the extreme points of the joint range set $\mathcal A$ of two distributions $p$ and $q$, defined as $\mathcal A := \{(\mathbf T p, \mathbf T q) | \mathbf T \in \mathcal C\}$, where $\mathcal C$ is the set of channels characterizing the constraints.

Related papers

• Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization [96.26317627118912]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (GDRO) Online learning techniques to reduce the number of samples required in each round from $m$ to $1$, keeping the same sample. A novel formulation of weighted GDRO, which allows us to derive distribution-dependent convergence rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T09:24:15Z)
• Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs [70.57916977441262]
  We investigate the problem of best identification in discounted linear Markov+Delta Decision in the fixed confidence setting under a generative model. The lower bound as the solution of an intricate non- optimization program can be used as the starting point to devise such algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T04:12:50Z)
• Near-Optimal Sample Complexity Bounds for Constrained MDPs [25.509556551558834]
  We provide minimax upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity for learning near-optimal policies in a discounted CMDP. We show that learning CMDPs is as easy as MDPs when small constraint violations are allowed, but inherently more difficult when we demand zero constraint violation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-13T15:58:14Z)
• Robust Sparse Mean Estimation via Sum of Squares [42.526664955704746]
  We study the problem of high-dimensional sparse mean estimation in the presence of an $epsilon$-fraction of adversarial outliers. Our algorithms follow the Sum-of-Squares based, to algorithms approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T16:49:54Z)
• The Minimax Complexity of Distributed Optimization [0.0]
  I present the "graph oracle model", an extension of the classic oracle framework that can be applied to distributed optimization. I focus on the specific case of the "intermittent communication setting" I analyze the theoretical properties of the popular Local Descent (SGD) algorithm in convex setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T15:18:33Z)
• Towards Tight Communication Lower Bounds for Distributed Optimisation [30.134447658488057]
  We consider a standard distributed optimisation setting where $N$ machines aim to jointly minimise the sum of the functions $sum_i = 1N f_i (x)$. Our main result provides the first fully unconditional bounds on total number of bits which need to be sent and received by the $N$ machines. We show that $Omega( Nd log d / Nvarepsilon)$ total bits need to be communicated between the machines to find an additive $epsilon$-approximation to the minimum of $sum_i = 1N
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T08:10:02Z)
• Private Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization: Adaptive Algorithms and Tighter Generalization Bounds [72.63031036770425]
  We propose differentially private (DP) algorithms for bound non-dimensional optimization. We demonstrate two popular deep learning methods on the empirical advantages over standard gradient methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-24T06:01:24Z)
• Breaking the Sample Size Barrier in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [50.38446482252857]
  This paper is concerned with the sample efficiency of reinforcement learning, assuming access to a generative model (or simulator) We first consider $gamma$-discounted infinite-horizon Markov decision processes (MDPs) with state space $mathcalS$ and action space $mathcalA$. We prove that a plain model-based planning algorithm suffices to achieve minimax-optimal sample complexity given any target accuracy level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T17:53:18Z)
• Computationally efficient sparse clustering [67.95910835079825]
  We provide a finite sample analysis of a new clustering algorithm based on PCA. We show that it achieves the minimax optimal misclustering rate in the regime $|theta infty$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T17:51:30Z)
• Locally Private Hypothesis Selection [96.06118559817057]
  We output a distribution from $mathcalQ$ whose total variation distance to $p$ is comparable to the best such distribution. We show that the constraint of local differential privacy incurs an exponential increase in cost. Our algorithms result in exponential improvements on the round complexity of previous methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T18:30:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.