Academic Institutions in Multilateral Data Governance: Emerging
Arrangements for Negotiating Risk, Value and Ethics in the Big Data Economy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12347v1
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 04:03:24 GMT
- Title: Academic Institutions in Multilateral Data Governance: Emerging
Arrangements for Negotiating Risk, Value and Ethics in the Big Data Economy
- Authors: Tsvetelina Hristova, Liam Magee, Emma Kearney
- Abstract summary: We analyse four cases of data partnership involving academic institutions.
We examine the role afforded to the research partner in negotiating the relationship between risk, value, trust and ethics.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Data sharing partnerships are increasingly an imperative for research
institutions and, at the same time, a challenge for established models of data
governance and ethical research oversight. We analyse four cases of data
partnership involving academic institutions and examine the role afforded to
the research partner in negotiating the relationship between risk, value, trust
and ethics. Within this terrain, far from being a restraint on
financialisation, the instrumentation of ethics forms part of the wider
mobilisation of infrastructure for the realisation of profit in the big data
economy. Under what we term `combinatorial data governance' academic structures
for the management of research ethics are instrumentalised as organisational
functions that serve to mitigate reputational damage and societal distrust. In
the alternative model of `experimental data governance' researchers propose
frameworks and instruments for the rethinking of data ethics and the risks
associated with it - a model that is promising but limited in its practical
application.
Related papers
- Best Practices and Lessons Learned on Synthetic Data for Language Models [83.63271573197026]
The success of AI models relies on the availability of large, diverse, and high-quality datasets.
Synthetic data has emerged as a promising solution by generating artificial data that mimics real-world patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-11T06:34:17Z) - Navigating the Research Landscape of Decentralized Autonomous
Organizations: A Research Note and Agenda [0.0]
This note serves as a cause for thought for scholars interested in researching Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)
It covers key aspects of data retrieval, data selection criteria, issues in data reliability and validity.
The agenda aims to equip scholars with the essential knowledge required to conduct nuanced and rigorous academic studies on DAOs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-28T18:29:40Z) - On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and
Regulatory Norms [58.93352076927003]
There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies.
Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development.
We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z) - Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models.
It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation.
We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z) - Assessment of creditworthiness models privacy-preserving training with
synthetic data [4.014524824655106]
We evaluate the performance of models trained with synthetic data when applied to real-world data.
creditworthiness assessment models trained with synthetic data show a reduction of 3% of AUC and 6% of KS when compared with models trained with real data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-31T19:13:14Z) - Entity Graph Extraction from Legal Acts -- a Prototype for a Use Case in
Policy Design Analysis [52.77024349608834]
This paper presents a prototype developed to serve the quantitative study of public policy design.
Our system aims to automate the process of gathering legal documents, annotating them with Institutional Grammar, and using hypergraphs to analyse inter-relations between crucial entities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-02T10:57:47Z) - Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice: An Integrated Literature
Review [2.454361535046896]
The Advancing Data Justice Research and Practice (ADJRP) project aims to widen the lens of current thinking around data justice.
This integrated literature review lays the conceptual groundwork needed to support this aspiration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-06T21:09:27Z) - Achieving a Data-driven Risk Assessment Methodology for Ethical AI [3.523208537466128]
We show that a multidisciplinary research approach is the foundation of a pragmatic definition of ethical and societal risks faced by organizations using AI.
We propose a novel data-driven risk assessment methodology, entitled DRESS-eAI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T12:55:33Z) - Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process.
We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set.
We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z) - An Ethical Highlighter for People-Centric Dataset Creation [62.886916477131486]
We propose an analytical framework to guide ethical evaluation of existing datasets and to serve future dataset creators in avoiding missteps.
Our work is informed by a review and analysis of prior works and highlights where such ethical challenges arise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-27T07:18:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.