Migration Reframed? A multilingual analysis on the stance shift in Europe during the Ukrainian crisis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02813v2
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:44:59 GMT
• Title: Migration Reframed? A multilingual analysis on the stance shift in Europe during the Ukrainian crisis
• Authors: Sergej Wildemann, Claudia Nieder\'ee, Erick Elejalde
• Abstract summary: We analyze migration-related media coverage and associated social media interaction for Europe and selected European countries. All analyzed cases show a noticeable temporal stance shift around the start of the war in Ukraine. Still, there are apparent national differences in the size and stability of this shift.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The war in Ukraine seems to have positively changed the attitude toward the critical societal topic of migration in Europe -- at least towards refugees from Ukraine. We investigate whether this impression is substantiated by how the topic is reflected in online news and social media, thus linking the representation of the issue on the Web to its perception in society. For this purpose, we combine and adapt leading-edge automatic text processing for a novel multilingual stance detection approach. Starting from 5.5M Twitter posts published by 565 European news outlets in one year, beginning September 2021, plus replies, we perform a multilingual analysis of migration-related media coverage and associated social media interaction for Europe and selected European countries. The results of our analysis show that there is actually a reframing of the discussion illustrated by the terminology change, e.g., from "migrant" to "refugee", often even accentuated with phrases such as "real refugees". However, concerning a stance shift in public perception, the picture is more diverse than expected. All analyzed cases show a noticeable temporal stance shift around the start of the war in Ukraine. Still, there are apparent national differences in the size and stability of this shift.

Related papers

• A Computational Analysis of the Dehumanisation of Migrants from Syria and Ukraine in Slovene News Media [8.35176751141867]
  We adapt a recently proposed approach for English to study attitudes to migration expressed in Slovene newspapers. We examine changes in the discourse on migration between the 2015-16 migration crisis following the war in Syria and the 2022-23 period following the war in Ukraine. We find that while this discourse became more negative and more intense over time, it is less dehumanising when specifically addressing Ukrainian migrants compared to others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:28:09Z)
• The Geography of Information Diffusion in Online Discourse on Europe and Migration [4.590533239391236]
  We analyse the information circulating online about Europe and migration after retrieving a large amount of data from social media (Twitter) We combine retweets and hashtags network analysis with geolocation of users. Results show how the majority of online discussions occurs at a national level, especially when discussing migration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T13:30:34Z)
• News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
  This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
• Lost in Translation -- Multilingual Misinformation and its Evolution [52.07628580627591]
  This paper investigates the prevalence and dynamics of multilingual misinformation through an analysis of over 250,000 unique fact-checks spanning 95 languages. We find that while the majority of misinformation claims are only fact-checked once, 11.7%, corresponding to more than 21,000 claims, are checked multiple times. Using fact-checks as a proxy for the spread of misinformation, we find 33% of repeated claims cross linguistic boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T12:21:55Z)
• The Politics of Language Choice: How the Russian-Ukrainian War Influences Ukrainians' Language Use on Twitter [11.899559337707112]
  We examine language choice and tweeting activity of Ukrainian citizens based on more than 4 million geo-tagged tweets from over 62,000 users. We observe a steady shift from the Russian language towards the Ukrainian language already before the war, which drastically speeds up with its outbreak. We find that more than half of the Russian-tweeting users shift towards Ukrainian as a result of the war.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T12:15:54Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Automated multilingual detection of Pro-Kremlin propaganda in newspapers and Telegram posts [5.886782001771578]
  The full-scale conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine generated an unprecedented amount of news articles and social media data. This study analyses how the media affected and mirrored public opinion during the first month of the war using news articles and Telegram news channels in Ukrainian, Russian, Romanian and English. We propose and compare two methods of multilingual automated pro-Kremlin propaganda identification, based on Transformers and linguistic features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T14:25:37Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)
• Migration and Refugee Crisis: a Critical Analysis of Online Public Perception [2.9005223064604078]
  The migration rate and the level of resentments towards migrants are an important issue in modern civilisation. We analyse sentiment and the associated context of expressions in a vast collection of tweets related to the EU refugee crisis. Our study reveals a marginally higher proportion of negative sentiments vis-a-vis migrants and a large proportion of the negative sentiments is more reflected among the ordinary users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T02:04:01Z)
• Tracking, exploring and analyzing recent developments in German-language online press in the face of the coronavirus crisis: cOWIDplus Analysis and cOWIDplus Viewer [62.997667081978825]
  The coronavirus pandemic may be the largest crisis the world has had to face since World War II. It does not come as a surprise that it is also having an impact on language as our primary communication tool. We present three inter-connected resources that are designed to capture and illustrate these effects on a subset of the German language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T12:21:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.