Sok: Comprehensive Security Overview, Challenges, and Future Directions of Voice-Controlled Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17100v1
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 12:18:46 GMT
- Title: Sok: Comprehensive Security Overview, Challenges, and Future Directions of Voice-Controlled Systems
- Authors: Haozhe Xu, Cong Wu, Yangyang Gu, Xingcan Shang, Jing Chen, Kun He, Ruiying Du,
- Abstract summary: The integration of Voice Control Systems into smart devices accentuates the importance of their security.
Current research has uncovered numerous vulnerabilities in VCS, presenting significant risks to user privacy and security.
This study introduces a hierarchical model structure for VCS, providing a novel lens for categorizing and analyzing existing literature in a systematic manner.
We classify attacks based on their technical principles and thoroughly evaluate various attributes, such as their methods, targets, vectors, and behaviors.
- Score: 10.86045604075024
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The integration of Voice Control Systems (VCS) into smart devices and their growing presence in daily life accentuate the importance of their security. Current research has uncovered numerous vulnerabilities in VCS, presenting significant risks to user privacy and security. However, a cohesive and systematic examination of these vulnerabilities and the corresponding solutions is still absent. This lack of comprehensive analysis presents a challenge for VCS designers in fully understanding and mitigating the security issues within these systems. Addressing this gap, our study introduces a hierarchical model structure for VCS, providing a novel lens for categorizing and analyzing existing literature in a systematic manner. We classify attacks based on their technical principles and thoroughly evaluate various attributes, such as their methods, targets, vectors, and behaviors. Furthermore, we consolidate and assess the defense mechanisms proposed in current research, offering actionable recommendations for enhancing VCS security. Our work makes a significant contribution by simplifying the complexity inherent in VCS security, aiding designers in effectively identifying and countering potential threats, and setting a foundation for future advancements in VCS security research.
Related papers
- Cross-Modality Safety Alignment [73.8765529028288]
We introduce a novel safety alignment challenge called Safe Inputs but Unsafe Output (SIUO) to evaluate cross-modality safety alignment.
To empirically investigate this problem, we developed the SIUO, a cross-modality benchmark encompassing 9 critical safety domains, such as self-harm, illegal activities, and privacy violations.
Our findings reveal substantial safety vulnerabilities in both closed- and open-source LVLMs, underscoring the inadequacy of current models to reliably interpret and respond to complex, real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T16:14:15Z) - Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems [88.80306881112313]
We will introduce and define a family of approaches to AI safety, which we will refer to as guaranteed safe (GS) AI.
The core feature of these approaches is that they aim to produce AI systems which are equipped with high-assurance quantitative safety guarantees.
We outline a number of approaches for creating each of these three core components, describe the main technical challenges, and suggest a number of potential solutions to them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-10T17:38:32Z) - Mapping LLM Security Landscapes: A Comprehensive Stakeholder Risk Assessment Proposal [0.0]
We propose a risk assessment process using tools like the risk rating methodology which is used for traditional systems.
We conduct scenario analysis to identify potential threat agents and map the dependent system components against vulnerability factors.
We also map threats against three key stakeholder groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-20T05:17:22Z) - The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM
Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness [56.174255970895466]
Large Language Models (LLMs) play an increasingly pivotal role in natural language processing applications.
This paper presents Safety and Over-Defensiveness Evaluation (SODE) benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-30T17:37:06Z) - Cybersecurity in Motion: A Survey of Challenges and Requirements for Future Test Facilities of CAVs [11.853500347907826]
Cooperative Intelligent Transportation Systems (C-ITSs) are at the forefront of this evolution.
This paper presents an envisaged Cybersecurity Centre of Excellence (CSCE) designed to bolster research, testing, and evaluation of the cybersecurity of C-ITSs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-22T13:42:53Z) - The Last Decade in Review: Tracing the Evolution of Safety Assurance
Cases through a Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis [7.431812376079826]
Safety assurance is of paramount importance across various domains, including automotive, aerospace, and nuclear energy.
The use of safety assurance cases allows for verifying the correctness of the created systems capabilities, preventing system failure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T17:34:23Z) - LLM for SoC Security: A Paradigm Shift [10.538841854672786]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are celebrated for their remarkable success in natural language understanding, advanced reasoning, and program synthesis tasks.
This paper offers an in-depth analysis of existing works, showcases practical case studies, demonstrates comprehensive experiments, and provides useful promoting guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T18:02:38Z) - Leveraging Traceability to Integrate Safety Analysis Artifacts into the
Software Development Process [51.42800587382228]
Safety assurance cases (SACs) can be challenging to maintain during system evolution.
We propose a solution that leverages software traceability to connect relevant system artifacts to safety analysis models.
We elicit design rationales for system changes to help safety stakeholders analyze the impact of system changes on safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T16:03:27Z) - Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks,
Evaluations, and Improvements [76.80453043969209]
This survey presents a framework for safety research pertaining to large models.
We begin by introducing safety issues of wide concern, then delve into safety evaluation methods for large models.
We explore the strategies for enhancing large model safety from training to deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-18T09:32:55Z) - Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance.
We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems.
We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.