Probabilistic Uncertainty-Aware Risk Spot Detector for Naturalistic Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.07181v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:22:51 GMT
• Title: Probabilistic Uncertainty-Aware Risk Spot Detector for Naturalistic Driving
• Authors: Tim Puphal, Malte Probst and Julian Eggert
• Abstract summary: Risk assessment is a central element for the development and validation of Autonomous Vehicles. Time Headway (TH) and Time-To-Contact (TTC) are commonly used risk metrics and have qualitative relations to occurrence probability. We present a probabilistic situation risk model based on survival analysis considerations and extend it to naturally incorporate sensory, temporal and behavioral uncertainties.
• Score: 1.8047694351309207
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Risk assessment is a central element for the development and validation of Autonomous Vehicles (AV). It comprises a combination of occurrence probability and severity of future critical events. Time Headway (TH) as well as Time-To-Contact (TTC) are commonly used risk metrics and have qualitative relations to occurrence probability. However, they lack theoretical derivations and additionally they are designed to only cover special types of traffic scenarios (e.g. following between single car pairs). In this paper, we present a probabilistic situation risk model based on survival analysis considerations and extend it to naturally incorporate sensory, temporal and behavioral uncertainties as they arise in real-world scenarios. The resulting Risk Spot Detector (RSD) is applied and tested on naturalistic driving data of a multi-lane boulevard with several intersections, enabling the visualization of road criticality maps. Compared to TH and TTC, our approach is more selective and specific in predicting risk. RSD concentrates on driving sections of high vehicle density where large accelerations and decelerations or approaches with high velocity occur.

Related papers

• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Seeing is not Believing: Robust Reinforcement Learning against Spurious Correlation [57.351098530477124]
  We consider one critical type of robustness against spurious correlation, where different portions of the state do not have correlations induced by unobserved confounders. A model that learns such useless or even harmful correlation could catastrophically fail when the confounder in the test case deviates from the training one. Existing robust algorithms that assume simple and unstructured uncertainty sets are therefore inadequate to address this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T23:53:37Z)
• Sequential Attention Source Identification Based on Feature Representation [88.05527934953311]
  This paper proposes a sequence-to-sequence based localization framework called Temporal-sequence based Graph Attention Source Identification (TGASI) based on an inductive learning idea. It's worth mentioning that the inductive learning idea ensures that TGASI can detect the sources in new scenarios without knowing other prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T03:00:28Z)
• Continuous Risk Measures for Driving Support [0.0]
  We compare three model-based risk measures by evaluating their stengths and qualitatively testing them quantitatively. We derive a novel risk measure based on the statistics of sparse critical events and so-called survival conditions. The resulting survival analysis shows to have an earlier detection time crashes and less false positive detections in near-crash and non-crash cases supported by its solid theoretical grounding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T15:54:37Z)
• Optimization of Velocity Ramps with Survival Analysis for Intersection Merge-Ins [1.6326895385412847]
  We consider the problem of correct motion planning for T-intersection merge-ins of arbitrary geometry and vehicle density. A merge-in support system has to estimate the chances that a gap between two consecutive vehicles can be taken successfully.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T12:13:26Z)
• A Probabilistic Framework for Estimating the Risk of Pedestrian-Vehicle Conflicts at Intersections [5.8366275205801985]
  This study proposes a probabilistic framework for estimating the risk of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at intersections. The proposed framework loosens restrictions of constant speed by predicting trajectories using a Gaussian Process Regression. Real-world LiDAR data collected at an intersection was used to evaluate the performance of the proposed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T15:08:41Z)
• Mathematical Models of Human Drivers Using Artificial Risk Fields [8.074019565026544]
  We use the concept of artificial risk fields to predict how human operators control a vehicle in response to upcoming road situations. We observe that the risk fields are excellent at predicting future trajectory with high prediction accuracy for up to twenty seconds prediction horizons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T15:39:01Z)
• Analyzing vehicle pedestrian interactions combining data cube structure and predictive collision risk estimation model [5.73658856166614]
  This study introduces a new concept of a pedestrian safety system that combines the field and the centralized processes. The system can warn of upcoming risks immediately in the field and improve the safety of risk frequent areas by assessing the safety levels of roads without actual collisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-26T23:00:56Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• A model for traffic incident prediction using emergency braking data [77.34726150561087]
  We address the fundamental problem of data scarcity in road traffic accident prediction by training our model on emergency braking events instead of accidents. We present a prototype implementing a traffic incident prediction model for Germany based on emergency braking data from Mercedes-Benz vehicles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:17:12Z)
• Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts? [104.04999499189402]
  Out-of-training-distribution (OOD) scenarios are a common challenge of learning agents at deployment. We propose an uncertainty-aware planning method, called emphrobust imitative planning (RIP) Our method can detect and recover from some distribution shifts, reducing the overconfident and catastrophic extrapolations in OOD scenes. We introduce an autonomous car novel-scene benchmark, textttCARNOVEL, to evaluate the robustness of driving agents to a suite of tasks with distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T11:07:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.