Towards ethical multimodal systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13765v3
• Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 08:29:33 GMT
• Title: Towards ethical multimodal systems
• Authors: Alexis Roger, Esma Aïmeur, Irina Rish,
• Abstract summary: The emerging field of AI alignment aims to make AI systems reflect human values. This paper focuses on evaluating the ethics of multimodal AI systems involving both text and images.
• Score: 10.518452055021488
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI systems (ChatGPT, DALL-E, etc) are expanding into multiple areas of our lives, from art Rombach et al. [2021] to mental health Rob Morris and Kareem Kouddous [2022]; their rapidly growing societal impact opens new opportunities, but also raises ethical concerns. The emerging field of AI alignment aims to make AI systems reflect human values. This paper focuses on evaluating the ethics of multimodal AI systems involving both text and images - a relatively under-explored area, as most alignment work is currently focused on language models. We first create a multimodal ethical database from human feedback on ethicality. Then, using this database, we develop algorithms, including a RoBERTa-large classifier and a multilayer perceptron, to automatically assess the ethicality of system responses.

Related papers

• AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
  There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness. The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z)
• Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment: A Systematic Review for Clarifications, Framework, and Future Directions [101.67121669727354]
  Recent advancements in AI have highlighted the importance of guiding AI systems towards the intended goals, ethical principles, and values of individuals and groups, a concept broadly recognized as alignment. The lack of clarified definitions and scopes of human-AI alignment poses a significant obstacle, hampering collaborative efforts across research domains to achieve this alignment. We introduce a systematic review of over 400 papers published between 2019 and January 2024, spanning multiple domains such as Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:03:25Z)
• Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Language Model Agents [0.0]
  Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems. I pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive. I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Language Model Agents'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T05:34:07Z)
• AI and Identity [0.8879149917735942]
  This paper examines the intersection of AI and identity as a pathway to understand biases, inequalities, and ethical considerations in AI development and deployment. We propose a framework that highlights the need for diversity in AI across three dimensions: Creators, Creations, and Consequences through the lens of identity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T15:07:30Z)
• Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
  We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions. In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z)
• Neurosymbolic Value-Inspired AI (Why, What, and How) [8.946847190099206]
  We propose a neurosymbolic computational framework called Value-Inspired AI (VAI) VAI aims to represent and integrate various dimensions of human values. We offer insights into the current progress made in this direction and outline potential future directions for the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T16:33:57Z)
• Hybrid Approaches for Moral Value Alignment in AI Agents: a Manifesto [3.7414804164475983]
  Increasing interest in ensuring the safety of next-generation Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems calls for novel approaches to embedding morality into autonomous agents. We provide a systematization of existing approaches to the problem of introducing morality in machines - modelled as a continuum. We argue that more hybrid solutions are needed to create adaptable and robust, yet controllable and interpretable agentic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T11:46:34Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering [20.644494592443245]
  We present a Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T00:09:08Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• Human in the Loop for Machine Creativity [0.0]
  We conceptualize existing and future human-in-the-loop (HITL) approaches for creative applications. We examine and speculate on long term implications for models, interfaces, and machine creativity. We envision multimodal HITL processes, where texts, visuals, sounds, and other information are coupled together, with automated analysis of humans and environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T15:42:18Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.