Advancing Community Engaged Approaches to Identifying Structural Drivers of Racial Bias in Health Diagnostic Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.13485v1
• Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 20:58:15 GMT
• Title: Advancing Community Engaged Approaches to Identifying Structural Drivers of Racial Bias in Health Diagnostic Algorithms
• Authors: Jill A. Kuhlberg (1), Irene Headen (2), Ellis A. Ballard (3), Donald Martin Jr., (4) ((1) System Stars LLC, (2) Drexel University, (3) Washington University in St. Louis, (4) Google)
• Abstract summary: Much attention has been raised recently about bias and the use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare. This paper highlights the importance of centering the discussion of data and healthcare on people and their experiences with healthcare and science. Collective memory of community trauma, through deaths attributed to poor healthcare, and negative experiences with healthcare are endogenous drivers of seeking treatment and experiencing effective care.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Much attention and concern has been raised recently about bias and the use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare, especially as it relates to perpetuating racial discrimination and health disparities. Following an initial system dynamics workshop at the Data for Black Lives II conference hosted at MIT in January of 2019, a group of conference participants interested in building capabilities to use system dynamics to understand complex societal issues convened monthly to explore issues related to racial bias in AI and implications for health disparities through qualitative and simulation modeling. In this paper we present results and insights from the modeling process and highlight the importance of centering the discussion of data and healthcare on people and their experiences with healthcare and science, and recognizing the societal context where the algorithm is operating. Collective memory of community trauma, through deaths attributed to poor healthcare, and negative experiences with healthcare are endogenous drivers of seeking treatment and experiencing effective care, which impact the availability and quality of data for algorithms. These drivers have drastically disparate initial conditions for different racial groups and point to limited impact of focusing solely on improving diagnostic algorithms for achieving better health outcomes for some groups.

Related papers

• AI-Driven Healthcare: A Survey on Ensuring Fairness and Mitigating Bias [2.398440840890111]
  AI applications have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions. These advancements also introduce substantial ethical and fairness challenges. These biases can lead to disparities in healthcare delivery, affecting diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes across different demographic groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T02:39:17Z)
• Open Challenges on Fairness of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Applications [3.8236840661885485]
  The chapter first discusses various sources of bias, including data collection, model training, and clinical deployment. We then turn to discussing open challenges that we believe require attention from researchers and practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T02:41:19Z)
• Evaluating the Fairness of the MIMIC-IV Dataset and a Baseline Algorithm: Application to the ICU Length of Stay Prediction [65.268245109828]
  This paper uses the MIMIC-IV dataset to examine the fairness and bias in an XGBoost binary classification model predicting the ICU length of stay. The research reveals class imbalances in the dataset across demographic attributes and employs data preprocessing and feature extraction. The paper concludes with recommendations for fairness-aware machine learning techniques for mitigating biases and the need for collaborative efforts among healthcare professionals and data scientists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T16:01:48Z)
• Fairness in Machine Learning meets with Equity in Healthcare [6.842248432925292]
  This study proposes an artificial intelligence framework for identifying and mitigating biases in data and models. A case study is presented to demonstrate how systematic biases in data can lead to amplified biases in model predictions. Future research aims to test and validate the proposed ML framework in real-world clinical settings to evaluate its impact on promoting health equity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T14:25:34Z)
• Algorithmic Bias in Machine Learning Based Delirium Prediction [20.16366948502659]
  We present some initial experimental evidence showing how sociodemographic features such as sex and race can impact the model performance across subgroups. Our intent is to initiate a discussion about the intersectionality effects of old age, race and socioeconomic factors on the early-stage detection and prevention of delirium using ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T18:35:42Z)
• Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review [90.22219142430146]
  We analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities. We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint. We propose several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T04:32:10Z)
• Algorithm Fairness in AI for Medicine and Healthcare [4.626801344708786]
  algorithm fairness is a challenging problem in delivering equitable care. Recent evaluation of AI models stratified across race sub-populations have revealed enormous inequalities in how patients are diagnosed, given treatments, and billed for healthcare costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-01T18:18:13Z)
• The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment: Medical Decision Modelling through Simulation [81.72197368690031]
  We present a new benchmarking suite designed specifically for medical sequential decision making. The Medkit-Learn(ing) Environment is a publicly available Python package providing simple and easy access to high-fidelity synthetic medical data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T10:38:09Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
• Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling Approach [55.41644538483948]
  This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units. The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z)
• Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Disease Diagnosis [52.111516253474285]
  We propose to integrate a hierarchical policy structure of two levels into the dialogue systemfor policy learning. The proposed policy structure is capable to deal with diagnosis problem including large number of diseases and symptoms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T15:02:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.