Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05832v1
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 06:47:23 GMT
- Title: Fairness in Computational Innovations: Identifying Bias in Substance Use Treatment Length of Stay Prediction Models with Policy Implications
- Authors: Ugur Kursuncu, Aaron Baird, Yusen Xia,
- Abstract summary: Predictive machine learning (ML) models are computational innovations that can enhance medical decision-making.
However, societal biases can be encoded into such models, raising concerns about inadvertently affecting health outcomes for disadvantaged groups.
This issue is particularly pressing in the context of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, where biases in predictive models could significantly impact the recovery of highly vulnerable patients.
- Score: 0.477529483515826
- License:
- Abstract: Predictive machine learning (ML) models are computational innovations that can enhance medical decision-making, including aiding in determining optimal timing for discharging patients. However, societal biases can be encoded into such models, raising concerns about inadvertently affecting health outcomes for disadvantaged groups. This issue is particularly pressing in the context of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, where biases in predictive models could significantly impact the recovery of highly vulnerable patients. In this study, we focus on the development and assessment of ML models designed to predict the length of stay (LOS) for both inpatients (i.e., residential) and outpatients undergoing SUD treatment. We utilize the Treatment Episode Data Set for Discharges (TEDS-D) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Through the lenses of distributive justice and socio-relational fairness, we assess our models for bias across variables related to demographics (e.g., race) as well as medical (e.g., diagnosis) and financial conditions (e.g., insurance). We find that race, US geographic region, type of substance used, diagnosis, and payment source for treatment are primary indicators of unfairness. From a policy perspective, we provide bias mitigation strategies to achieve fair outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings for medical decision-making and health equity. We ultimately seek to contribute to the innovation and policy-making literature by seeking to advance the broader objectives of social justice when applying computational innovations in health care.
Related papers
- Debias-CLR: A Contrastive Learning Based Debiasing Method for Algorithmic Fairness in Healthcare Applications [0.17624347338410748]
We proposed an implicit in-processing debiasing method to combat disparate treatment.
We used clinical notes of heart failure patients and used diagnostic codes, procedure reports and physiological vitals of the patients.
We found that Debias-CLR was able to reduce the Single-Category Word Embedding Association Test (SC-WEAT) effect size score when debiasing for gender and ethnicity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T19:32:01Z) - Predictive and Prescriptive Analytics for Multi-Site Modeling of Frail and Elderly Patient Services [0.0]
The aim of this research is to assess how various predictive and prescriptive analytical methods contribute to addressing the operational challenges within an area of healthcare that is growing in demand.
On the prescriptive side, deterministic and two-stage programs are developed to determine how to optimally plan for beds and ward staff.
Our research reveals that healthcare managers should consider using predictive and prescriptive models to make more informed decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T12:25:45Z) - MedDiffusion: Boosting Health Risk Prediction via Diffusion-based Data
Augmentation [58.93221876843639]
This paper introduces a novel, end-to-end diffusion-based risk prediction model, named MedDiffusion.
It enhances risk prediction performance by creating synthetic patient data during training to enlarge sample space.
It discerns hidden relationships between patient visits using a step-wise attention mechanism, enabling the model to automatically retain the most vital information for generating high-quality data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T01:36:30Z) - Fairness in Machine Learning meets with Equity in Healthcare [6.842248432925292]
This study proposes an artificial intelligence framework for identifying and mitigating biases in data and models.
A case study is presented to demonstrate how systematic biases in data can lead to amplified biases in model predictions.
Future research aims to test and validate the proposed ML framework in real-world clinical settings to evaluate its impact on promoting health equity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T14:25:34Z) - Connecting Fairness in Machine Learning with Public Health Equity [0.0]
biases in data and model design can result in disparities for certain protected groups and amplify existing inequalities in healthcare.
This study summarizes seminal literature on ML fairness and presents a framework for identifying and mitigating biases in the data and model.
Case studies suggest how the framework can be used to prevent these biases and highlight the need for fair and equitable ML models in public health.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-08T10:21:49Z) - Mitigating Health Disparities in EHR via Deconfounder [5.511343163506091]
We propose a novel framework, Parity Medical Deconfounder (PriMeD), to deal with the disparity issue in healthcare datasets.
PriMeD adopts a Conditional Variational Autoencoder (CVAE) to learn latent factors (substitute confounders) for observational data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-28T05:16:50Z) - Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review [90.22219142430146]
We analyze the intersection of fairness in machine learning and healthcare disparities.
We provide a critical review of the associated fairness metrics from a machine learning standpoint.
We propose several new research directions that hold promise for developing ethical and equitable ML applications in healthcare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T04:32:10Z) - Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised
Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks.
Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets.
We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z) - UNITE: Uncertainty-based Health Risk Prediction Leveraging Multi-sourced
Data [81.00385374948125]
We present UNcertaInTy-based hEalth risk prediction (UNITE) model.
UNITE provides accurate disease risk prediction and uncertainty estimation leveraging multi-sourced health data.
We evaluate UNITE on real-world disease risk prediction tasks: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NASH) and Alzheimer's disease (AD)
UNITE achieves up to 0.841 in F1 score for AD detection, up to 0.609 in PR-AUC for NASH detection, and outperforms various state-of-the-art baselines by up to $19%$ over the best baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-22T02:28:11Z) - Hemogram Data as a Tool for Decision-making in COVID-19 Management:
Applications to Resource Scarcity Scenarios [62.997667081978825]
COVID-19 pandemics has challenged emergency response systems worldwide, with widespread reports of essential services breakdown and collapse of health care structure.
This work describes a machine learning model derived from hemogram exam data performed in symptomatic patients.
Proposed models can predict COVID-19 qRT-PCR results in symptomatic individuals with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-10T01:45:03Z) - Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from
Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling
Approach [55.41644538483948]
This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units.
The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.