HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18226v2
• Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:43:44 GMT
• Title: HowkGPT: Investigating the Detection of ChatGPT-generated University Student Homework through Context-Aware Perplexity Analysis
• Authors: Christoforos Vasilatos, Manaar Alam, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki and Michail Maniatakos
• Abstract summary: HowkGPT is built upon a dataset of academic assignments and accompanying metadata. It computes perplexity scores for student-authored and ChatGPT-generated responses. It further refines its analysis by defining category-specific thresholds.
• Score: 13.098764928946208
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in text generation tasks proliferates, concerns arise over their potential to compromise academic integrity. The education sector currently tussles with distinguishing student-authored homework assignments from AI-generated ones. This paper addresses the challenge by introducing HowkGPT, designed to identify homework assignments generated by AI. HowkGPT is built upon a dataset of academic assignments and accompanying metadata [17] and employs a pretrained LLM to compute perplexity scores for student-authored and ChatGPT-generated responses. These scores then assist in establishing a threshold for discerning the origin of a submitted assignment. Given the specificity and contextual nature of academic work, HowkGPT further refines its analysis by defining category-specific thresholds derived from the metadata, enhancing the precision of the detection. This study emphasizes the critical need for effective strategies to uphold academic integrity amidst the growing influence of LLMs and provides an approach to ensuring fair and accurate grading in educational institutions.

Related papers

• Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation [63.50597360948099]
  Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks. We propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement. We use this framework to explore citation text generation -- a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T16:41:08Z)
• Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale [66.75309523854476]
  We study how well large language models (LLMs) explain their generations through rationales. We show that prompting-based methods are less "faithful" than attribution-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T20:06:30Z)
• Keystroke Dynamics Against Academic Dishonesty in the Age of LLMs [25.683026758476835]
  This study proposes a keystroke dynamics-based method to differentiate between bona fide and assisted writing. To facilitate this, a dataset was developed to capture the keystroke patterns of individuals engaged in writing tasks. The detector, trained using a modified TypeNet architecture, achieved accuracies ranging from 74.98% to 85.72% in condition-specific scenarios and from 52.24% to 80.54% in condition-agnostic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T17:51:26Z)
• Hidding the Ghostwriters: An Adversarial Evaluation of AI-Generated Student Essay Detection [29.433764586753956]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in text generation tasks. The utilization of these models carries inherent risks, including but not limited to plagiarism, the dissemination of fake news, and issues in educational exercises. This paper aims to bridge this gap by constructing AIG-ASAP, an AI-generated student essay dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T08:11:56Z)
• Enhancing Robustness of LLM-Synthetic Text Detectors for Academic Writing: A Comprehensive Analysis [35.351782110161025]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer numerous advantages in terms of revolutionizing work and study methods. They have also garnered significant attention due to their potential negative consequences. One example is generating academic reports or papers with little to no human contribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T01:58:36Z)
• Exploiting Contextual Target Attributes for Target Sentiment Classification [53.30511968323911]
  Existing PTLM-based models for TSC can be categorized into two groups: 1) fine-tuning-based models that adopt PTLM as the context encoder; 2) prompting-based models that transfer the classification task to the text/word generation task. We present a new perspective of leveraging PTLM for TSC: simultaneously leveraging the merits of both language modeling and explicit target-context interactions via contextual target attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T11:45:28Z)
• Towards Verifiable Generation: A Benchmark for Knowledge-aware Language Model Attribution [48.86322922826514]
  This paper defines a new task of Knowledge-aware Language Model Attribution (KaLMA) First, we extend attribution source from unstructured texts to Knowledge Graph (KG), whose rich structures benefit both the attribution performance and working scenarios. Second, we propose a new Conscious Incompetence" setting considering the incomplete knowledge repository. Third, we propose a comprehensive automatic evaluation metric encompassing text quality, citation quality, and text citation alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T11:45:59Z)
• Ethical Aspects of ChatGPT in Software Engineering Research [4.0594888788503205]
  ChatGPT can improve Software Engineering (SE) research practices by offering efficient, accessible information analysis and synthesis based on natural language interactions. However, ChatGPT could bring ethical challenges, encompassing plagiarism, privacy, data security, and the risk of generating biased or potentially detrimental data. This research aims to fill the given gap by elaborating on the key elements: motivators, demotivators, and ethical principles of using ChatGPT in SE research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T06:13:21Z)
• Creating Large Language Model Resistant Exams: Guidelines and Strategies [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have raised concerns about their potential impact on academic integrity. This article investigates the performance of LLMs on exams and their implications for assessment. We propose guidelines for creating LLM-resistant exams, including content moderation, deliberate inaccuracies, real-world scenarios beyond the model's knowledge base, effective distractor options, evaluating soft skills, and incorporating non-textual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T18:01:32Z)
• Does Synthetic Data Generation of LLMs Help Clinical Text Mining? [51.205078179427645]
  We investigate the potential of OpenAI's ChatGPT to aid in clinical text mining. We propose a new training paradigm that involves generating a vast quantity of high-quality synthetic data. Our method has resulted in significant improvements in the performance of downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T03:56:31Z)
• Positioning yourself in the maze of Neural Text Generation: A Task-Agnostic Survey [54.34370423151014]
  This paper surveys the components of modeling approaches relaying task impacts across various generation tasks such as storytelling, summarization, translation etc. We present an abstraction of the imperative techniques with respect to learning paradigms, pretraining, modeling approaches, decoding and the key challenges outstanding in the field in each of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T17:54:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.