Evaluating and Incentivizing Diverse Data Contributions in Collaborative
Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05592v1
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 23:38:25 GMT
- Title: Evaluating and Incentivizing Diverse Data Contributions in Collaborative
Learning
- Authors: Baihe Huang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Michael I. Jordan
- Abstract summary: For a federated learning model to perform well, it is crucial to have a diverse and representative dataset.
We show that the statistical criterion used to quantify the diversity of the data, as well as the choice of the federated learning algorithm used, has a significant effect on the resulting equilibrium.
We leverage this to design simple optimal federated learning mechanisms that encourage data collectors to contribute data representative of the global population.
- Score: 89.21177894013225
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: For a federated learning model to perform well, it is crucial to have a
diverse and representative dataset. However, the data contributors may only be
concerned with the performance on a specific subset of the population, which
may not reflect the diversity of the wider population. This creates a tension
between the principal (the FL platform designer) who cares about global
performance and the agents (the data collectors) who care about local
performance. In this work, we formulate this tension as a game between the
principal and multiple agents, and focus on the linear experiment design
problem to formally study their interaction. We show that the statistical
criterion used to quantify the diversity of the data, as well as the choice of
the federated learning algorithm used, has a significant effect on the
resulting equilibrium. We leverage this to design simple optimal federated
learning mechanisms that encourage data collectors to contribute data
representative of the global population, thereby maximizing global performance.
Related papers
- FedReMa: Improving Personalized Federated Learning via Leveraging the Most Relevant Clients [13.98392319567057]
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that achieves a globally robust model through decentralized computation and periodic model synthesis.
Despite their wide adoption, existing FL and PFL works have yet to comprehensively address the class-imbalance issue.
We propose FedReMa, an efficient PFL algorithm that can tackle class-imbalance by utilizing an adaptive inter-client co-learning approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T05:44:28Z) - Personalized Federated Learning with Feature Alignment and Classifier
Collaboration [13.320381377599245]
Data heterogeneity is one of the most challenging issues in federated learning.
One such approach in deep neural networks based tasks is employing a shared feature representation and learning a customized classifier head for each client.
In this work, we conduct explicit local-global feature alignment by leveraging global semantic knowledge for learning a better representation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T19:58:58Z) - Decentralized Learning with Multi-Headed Distillation [12.90857834791378]
Decentralized learning with private data is a central problem in machine learning.
We propose a novel distillation-based decentralized learning technique that allows multiple agents with private non-iid data to learn from each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-28T21:01:43Z) - Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning: Introducing a New
Notion and Standard Benchmarks [65.34113135080105]
We show that not only the issue of data heterogeneity in current setups is not necessarily a problem but also in fact it can be beneficial for the FL participants.
Our observations are intuitive.
Our code is available at https://github.com/MMorafah/FL-SC-NIID.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-30T17:15:19Z) - FLIS: Clustered Federated Learning via Inference Similarity for Non-IID
Data Distribution [7.924081556869144]
We present a new algorithm, FLIS, which groups the clients population in clusters with jointly trainable data distributions.
We present experimental results to demonstrate the benefits of FLIS over the state-of-the-art benchmarks on CIFAR-100/10, SVHN, and FMNIST datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-20T22:10:48Z) - Federated Mixture of Experts [94.25278695272874]
FedMix is a framework that allows us to train an ensemble of specialized models.
We show that users with similar data characteristics select the same members and therefore share statistical strength.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-14T14:15:24Z) - Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentation [123.37082242750866]
Federated learning has emerged as an important distributed learning paradigm, where a server aggregates a global model from many client-trained models while having no access to the client data.
We propose a novel federated learning system that employs zero-shot data augmentation on under-represented data to mitigate statistical heterogeneity and encourage more uniform accuracy performance across clients in federated networks.
We study two variants of this scheme, Fed-ZDAC (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the clients) and Fed-ZDAS (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the server).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-27T18:23:54Z) - Representation Matters: Assessing the Importance of Subgroup Allocations
in Training Data [85.43008636875345]
We show that diverse representation in training data is key to increasing subgroup performances and achieving population level objectives.
Our analysis and experiments describe how dataset compositions influence performance and provide constructive results for using trends in existing data, alongside domain knowledge, to help guide intentional, objective-aware dataset design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-05T00:27:08Z) - Multi-Center Federated Learning [62.57229809407692]
This paper proposes a novel multi-center aggregation mechanism for federated learning.
It learns multiple global models from the non-IID user data and simultaneously derives the optimal matching between users and centers.
Our experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method outperforms several popular federated learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T09:14:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.